Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 06:45 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
Yesterday at 08:08 PM

Gaza assault
Yesterday at 07:56 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 05:07 PM

New Britain
November 20, 2024, 05:41 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 20, 2024, 09:02 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 19, 2024, 06:36 AM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Welcome to Marleya

 (Read 22292 times)
  • Previous page 1 2 34 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #60 - March 28, 2009, 11:43 AM

     
    Marleya, what do you do with the principle of abrogation, put forward in the Quran itself?

    016.101
    YUSUFALI: When We substitute one revelation for another,- and Allah knows best what He reveals (in stages),- they say, "Thou art but a forger": but most of them understand not.
    PICKTHAL: And when We put a revelation in place of (another) revelation, - and Allah knoweth best what He revealeth - they say: Lo! thou art but inventing. Most of them know not.
    SHAKIR: And when We change (one) communication for (another) communication, and Allah knows best what He reveals, they say: You are only a forger. Nay, most of them do not know.
    None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar (2:106, AYA)


    Likewise the verses preaching tolerance have, according to the Quran itself, been abrogated by the verses preaching intolerance & violence, which come later.  Tongue



    Peace Rashna!

    I have to come back to you,answering this question.

  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #61 - March 28, 2009, 11:18 PM

    Quote
    In many suras God say oppression is worse than murder.

    Hello Marleya,

    A small correction, it does not say oppression, it says fitna. In one verse it said "..and fitna is worse then slaughter" in the other it said "..and fitna is worse then murder"

    Fitnah means questioning as well as causing people to question. I am sure you somehow in your belief system, you deem it necessary to not question, since questioning can lead to disbelief of islam, and to holding multiple gods, and to other bad things. And you might be right.

    However questioning and getting people to question is often the most important step to get out of an oppression. As such, it is quite unfair, to claim that those 2 verses are against 'oppression', when they vehemently close to the door to a tool used against oppression.

    If koran is against oppression, then I am sure you will find many many other verses to prove your belief. But not those Two.


    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #62 - March 28, 2009, 11:27 PM

    Quote
    The brutality and hardship put on africans from arabmuslim,are the same as the westerne slave trade.And they castrated the male,even though hadith say that any one that castrate their slaves,will be castrated in the hearafter.

    What you are stating is quite new to me. And it does not make sense since, in America and South America, and in most of the Caribbean islands, we have Millions of Black Africans. We have entire countries over there with majority Black. Yet in the Arab world and in Turkey, even in North Adrica, who had been practicing slavery for hundreds of years prior, and who were forced to stop the trade in slaves very recently, they do not have millions of black Africans living among them.

    The reality is, even when whites engaged in slavery. It was mostly to provide the boats and the money. The actual capture and 'chop chop chopping', was done by my ancestors.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #63 - March 29, 2009, 12:17 AM

    Peace Baal.

    You are wrong,your ancestors was not the first people fetching africans as slaves.

    Go to you tube,search for Islam and Black slaves,a video laid out by Prometheo1.

    In saudia,slavery was illegal in 1962-63,my friend,and still in mauretania,and sudan,you will find black africans slaves.Darfur is a conflict form old time.The afro-arabs looking at themself different than then the black africans.Darfur,means the land of blacks.

    Google slavery in Islam,and you will find information on this unknown history of arab muslims.
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #64 - March 29, 2009, 12:48 AM

    I just joined this forum today.  I find it very disheartening that at this late stage of the game, March of 2009, the discussion with a Muslim like Marleya gets mired in needless running around the circles with her bogus pseudo-arguments.  She is tap-dancing through all the excessively polite questions the others have asked her about her illogical stance (e.g., her "Koran-only" fantasy Islam), and over the years I have seen and read Muslims do these tap-dances a thousand times.  It gets old after a while.  Apparently, the others on this forum (at least those who have weighed in on this particular thread with Marleya), are not yet at the stage I have reached, of having lost patience with the Marleyas of the Western Muslim world.

    I was hoping to see a much better marshalling of knowledge from other forum members to shoot Marleya out of the water.  Instead, you ask tentatively and oh-so-polite questions of her that only give her the ability to obfuscate and tap-dance all the more -- thus generating 4 pages of disinformation, confusion, and obfuscation.  She like other Muslims can keep this game up FOREVER, if you don't nail them down, point by point.  Rule #1:  Do not move on to a second point until you have nailed them down on the first point.  I see this basic rule has been ignored here, allowing for Marleya to generate a fireworks display of dozens of points and sub-points, all of which help to obscure the untenable illogic and factual poverty of any one of all of her points.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #65 - March 29, 2009, 01:15 AM

    I just joined this forum today.  I find it very disheartening that at this late stage of the game, March of 2009, the discussion with a Muslim like Marleya gets mired in needless running around the circles with her bogus pseudo-arguments.  She is tap-dancing through all the excessively polite questions the others have asked her about her illogical stance (e.g., her "Koran-only" fantasy Islam), and over the years I have seen and read Muslims do these tap-dances a thousand times.  It gets old after a while.  Apparently, the others on this forum (at least those who have weighed in on this particular thread with Marleya), are not yet at the stage I have reached, of having lost patience with the Marleyas of the Western Muslim world.

    I was hoping to see a much better marshalling of knowledge from other forum members to shoot Marleya out of the water.  Instead, you ask tentatively and oh-so-polite questions of her that only give her the ability to obfuscate and tap-dance all the more -- thus generating 4 pages of disinformation, confusion, and obfuscation.  She like other Muslims can keep this game up FOREVER, if you don't nail them down, point by point.  Rule #1:  Do not move on to a second point until you have nailed them down on the first point.  I see this basic rule has been ignored here, allowing for Marleya to generate a fireworks display of dozens of points and sub-points, all of which help to obscure the untenable illogic and factual poverty of any one of all of her points.



    I am not tap dancing Hesperado and I am not arguing with anybody here.I accept their stance,and why shouldnt they accept mine?

    Why did you not use the marshalling of knowledge,to shoot me out of the water,instead of insulting me.Why should they nail me?I am not here to nail anybody.

    I found on my religious way,that a lot of the message was corrupted,and even people in here,know the Quran enough to know that is true.
    The human addition,that became religious laws,is making big problems,for muslims all over the world.

    I am still young,and I am seeking knowledge,from other humans.I can not explain everything in the religion Islam,or the Quran,I am not a learned one,I am just a beliver in God and think that the message,is corrupted.

    17:36

    "You shall not accept any information,unless you verify it for your self.I have given you hearing,eyesight and the brain.It is your responsibility for using them"

    Your harsh attack was not necessery,at all.You got a member here today,only to say this? cool2
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #66 - March 29, 2009, 01:34 AM

    Welcome Hesperado,

    We like to think that being gentle and hospitable to Muslim visitors like marleya will actually be more beneficial to all of us. I don't think that arguing fiercely all the time and attacking Muslims will accomplish much in the long run, except perhaps that even moderate Muslims will start hating us (which some of them admittedly already do).
    Essentially our philosophy is to be honest and correct in our criticisms of Islam and always treat Muslims kindly, so long they deserve it.

    German ex-Muslim forumMy YouTubeList of Ex-Muslims
    Wikis: en de fr ar tr
    CEMB-Chat
    I'm on an indefinite break...
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #67 - March 29, 2009, 01:40 AM

    Peace to everybody!
    My name is Marleya,and I am new here.Been reading a little around,and you guys discuss many interesting things.
    I am not an ex muslim,I am muslim,born with a norwegian mother and an african father.

    You use a lot of hadith,when you critize Islam,but you should know there is many of us,who have thrown hadith to the fish,and only use the Quran as guiding.

    Koran never mention sexual relations with pre-pubescent wives.The verse you are talking about is sura 65,vers 4
    where the rules of divorce is layd out.The verse is long,so I will only wright the words you have in mind Aksel

    "and for those women who dont started their period,the iddah(waiting time for remarrying)is also three months for them"

    Here God speak about married womans that dont have their period yet.So,if you read history of us humans,you will find that before in times,we women got our period much later than today.Google it,and you will find it.

    The body has to carry 22% fat on the body,before women will get their menses.Today,because of junk food and others,girls from their are nine can get their menses.
    This was not something that happen before.Women in could get 18-20 years before they got menses.Because of their diet.But this girls were grown ups,in maturity,and therefor they could be married.

    Grown up womens was married,before their menses,thats really how simple it is.

    As-Salam Alaiki Marleya.

    Sorry for the late reply, I just recently saw your post.

    Well, I'm happy to disregard hadith for the course of this discussion, but there is very strong evidence that the Koran and hadith are intertwined with the latter explaining the former. There are many passages of the Koran which are inexicable without recourse to hadith, but perhaps that's a topic for another day.

    Regarding 65:4, I am glad you agree that the only females this verse can be referring to are ones who have not yet reached menarche. I agree also that girls reached puberty later in pre-Islamic Arabia than in modern times:



    -Tanner (1955) Growth at adolescence. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Now, the verse could refer to an 18-20 yr old female who has not reached menarche yet, as their diet was very low in lipids as you say.

    However in the actual Koranic description: "those who have not yet menstruated" ( اللائي لم يحضن ) there is no such age specification. It could refer to any female past the age of nine as per hadith (Kitab an-Nikah), and if you deny hadith there is no minimum age stipulated at all.

    Secondly, verse 65:4 does indeed give permission for sexual intercourse with prepubescent females.

    For this we must refer to verse 33:49 which says that when Muslim men marry women "then divorce them before you have sexual intercourse with them" (ثم طلقتموهن من قبل ان تمسوهن ) there is no Iddah to be reckoned.

    Since 65:4 is describing the Iddah for a pre-pubescent wife, it is taken for granted that her husband must have already consumated the marriage, otherwise the question of Iddah would not even arise.

    Lastly, girls are Baligh by age nine according to Islamic fiqh. If you disregard the hadith you must have an alternative explanation for the age at which Baligh is attained based on Koran alone. Hope to hear back from you.

    Kind regards

    -Aksel

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #68 - March 29, 2009, 01:41 AM

    Quote
    I was hoping to see a much better marshalling of knowledge from other forum members to shoot Marleya out of the water.


    Hesperando, did it ever occur to you that we don't want to shoot Marleya out of the water?  That we don't want to nail her points down one by one?

    Marleya may be factually wrong on her understanding of Islam, her worldview may be riddled with illogic, but morally she is right.  The age of consent should be 17ish, domestic violence should be out of bounds, oppression should be worse than murder.  So why not let her get on with reforming Islam to the best of her ability?

    Maybe she can do more good inside Islam than she could do without.


    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #69 - March 29, 2009, 01:42 AM

    Welcome Hesperado,

    We like to think that being gentle and hospitable to Muslim visitors like marleya will actually be more beneficial to all of us. I don't think that arguing fiercely all the time and attacking Muslims will accomplish much in the long run, except perhaps that even moderate Muslims will start hating us (which some of them admittedly already do).
    Essentially our philosophy is to be honest and correct in our criticisms of Islam and always treat Muslims kindly, so long they deserve it.

    I agree, I try to maintain politeness to those who are polite.

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #70 - March 29, 2009, 04:50 AM

    Thanks for the welcome, Aziz.

    To all who responded, I will concede that I was inappropriate on one account: this particular thread (welcoming new members) was not really the proper thread on this forum to broach the complaints and issues I did.

    Other than that, I stand by everything I said. 

    I hope to plunge into the other threads in the near future to see how the issues are being handled.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #71 - March 29, 2009, 05:48 AM

    Peace Baal.

    You are wrong,your ancestors was not the first people fetching africans as slaves.

    I agree with you that arabs were not the first to enslave. I never mentioned anything to counter that.

    Go to you tube,search for Islam and Black slaves,a video laid out by Prometheo1.

    In saudia,slavery was illegal in 1962-63,my friend,and still in mauretania,and sudan,you will find black africans slaves.Darfur is a conflict form old time.The afro-arabs looking at themself different than then the black africans.Darfur,means the land of blacks.

    i am a bit sore about this darfur thingie btw. Estimated 2 million african people, getting genocided by, an arab regime.

    Quote
    Google slavery in Islam,and you will find information on this unknown history of arab muslims.

    Which part of slavery history, I am quite versed in the history of slavery. I had to look into hard since in my entire arabic upbringing this aspect of our recent history is never mentioned.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #72 - March 29, 2009, 06:55 PM

    Peace Aksel Ankersen

    Thank you for your nice reply Aksel.

    Hope I am not late,to answer.

    I find it disguisting,that Islam fiqh,says a nine year old girl is grown up,and ready to marry.

    There is one verse that speak of the orphans and marriage.

    4:6

    "And try orphans(as regards to their intelligence)unntil they reach the age of marriage,If you find sound judgement in them,release their property to them"

    This verse can not be speaking of young girls down to nine years old?Sound judgement is not reach at that age,I think.

    What do you think Aksel?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #73 - March 29, 2009, 07:02 PM

    Although I don't agree with all your views, I'm extremely happy to have you here & I enjoy reading your posts marleya. Smiley

    I'd be nice if you tell us, especially me what to do with the principle of abrogation in the Quran.

     thnkyu

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #74 - March 29, 2009, 07:36 PM

    Rashna,

    I'm glad you brought up abrogation in the Koran and asked marleya for her response (though I already know she will find a way to squirm out of it and deny its implications -- for how can she not?).

    Could you create an actual thread in one of the sections below dedicated to this topic of abrogation and have the discussion there?  I fear that otherwise, fewer people will read it, since this is titled "Welcome to Marleya" and readers and visitors may not know what's under discussion here.  Thanks.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #75 - March 29, 2009, 08:17 PM


    -Tanner (1955) Growth at adolescence. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Aksel where did u get this picture from, i can not find the book from 1955. And I find it highly unlikely that a book in 1955 would use colored Excel charts. So either this is a fabricated graph, either a remake of an existing one.


    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #76 - March 29, 2009, 08:29 PM

    I just joined this forum today. 


    Good to see you Hesperado - care to introduce yourself on a separate thread?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #77 - March 29, 2009, 08:31 PM

    Thanks Islame,  sure -- I will write up a little introduction of myself now on a thread here at the Welcome section.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #78 - March 29, 2009, 08:53 PM

    Although I don't agree with all your views, I'm extremely happy to have you here & I enjoy reading your posts marleya. Smiley

    I'd be nice if you tell us, especially me what to do with the principle of abrogation in the Quran.

     thnkyu


    Peace Rashna!

    Thank you,for your kind words Rashna.
    You ask me difficult questions,and it is difficult for me,to answer.

    I have a link,that speak about abrogations and substitute,maybe if you read that one,you can come back to me,what you think?

    http://www.mostmerciful.com/abrogation-and-substitution.htm   

    Thanks
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #79 - March 29, 2009, 08:55 PM

    Rashna,

    I'm glad you brought up abrogation in the Koran and asked marleya for her response (though I already know she will find a way to squirm out of it and deny its implications -- for how can she not?).

    Could you create an actual thread in one of the sections below dedicated to this topic of abrogation and have the discussion there?  I fear that otherwise, fewer people will read it, since this is titled "Welcome to Marleya" and readers and visitors may not know what's under discussion here.  Thanks.


    Why do you have a problem with me Hesperando?

  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #80 - March 29, 2009, 09:12 PM

    marleya,

    It's nothing personal.  I simply have a problem with you because you, as a Muslim, are a co-dependent enabler of an ideology that is threatening my life, the lives of my loved ones, and my society and its freedoms.  In that context, I welcome any public discussions and/or debates with you that will serve to help clarify the issues surrounding that nexus of co-dependent enabling.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #81 - March 29, 2009, 09:19 PM

    Peace Baal.

    I misunderstood you.I still mean that the arabs were the first to enslave africans and moved them to Irak,Iran,middle-east.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuGHKz2yRtk

     
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #82 - March 29, 2009, 09:27 PM

    marleya,

    It's nothing personal.  I simply have a problem with you because you, as a Muslim, are a co-dependent enabler of an ideology that is threatening my life, the lives of my loved ones, and my society and its freedoms.  In that context, I welcome any public discussions and/or debates with you that will serve to help clarify the issues surrounding that nexus of co-dependent enabling.


    You can not say its not personal Hesperando.Why would you jump in this thread,with that opening you had,if it is not personal?

    I am a threat to your loved ones,you say,what about you?Who are you a threat to?You are talking of deportion of humans,women,children,men,like you are talking about fruit.

    I think that if I am a threat to your loved ones,I know that you are a worse threat to not only mine loved ones,but many others too.Your harsh tone,dont have any symphaties any more.When you see muslim humans you see only devils?What makes you different than the fanatic religious in this world?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #83 - March 29, 2009, 10:01 PM

    Marleya, I don't doubt that there exist many harmless Muslims who pose no direct threat to me at all.  The problem is that we cannot sufficiently and reliably tell the difference anymore between them and the dangerous Muslims among them.  And secondly, by continuing to support Islam, the apparently harmless Muslims, along with their non-Muslim defenders in the West, are serving to enable the growing situation of more and more Muslims in our midst, among whom are ones plotting to mass-murder us.  It would be nice if we could pinpoint only the dangerous Muslims, but it's not that easy.  The al Qaeda Manual specifically tells its agents to act and to appear "less Islamic" -- to blend in as "moderates" while planning to mass-murder us.  What are we to do in a situation where more and more of these Muslims are posing a threat?  My #1 priority is to protect myself, my loved ones and my society.  In the course of self-defense, there is sometimes unavoidable collateral damage.  It has always been that way, it will always be that way.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #84 - March 29, 2009, 10:10 PM

    Marleya, I don't doubt that there exist many harmless Muslims who pose no direct threat to me at all.  The problem is that we cannot sufficiently and reliably tell the difference anymore between them and the dangerous Muslims among them.  And secondly, by continuing to support Islam, the apparently harmless Muslims, along with their non-Muslim defenders in the West, are serving to enable the growing situation of more and more Muslims in our midst, among whom are ones plotting to mass-murder us.  It would be nice if we could pinpoint only the dangerous Muslims, but it's not that easy.  The al Qaeda Manual specifically tells its agents to act and to appear "less Islamic" -- to blend in as "moderates" while planning to mass-murder us.  What are we to do in a situation where more and more of these Muslims are posing a threat?  My #1 priority is to protect myself, my loved ones and my society.  In the course of self-defense, there is sometimes unavoidable collateral damage.  It has always been that way, it will always be that way.



    Collateral damage!

    A famous line in many films.And completly not function when you speak about humans,if you dont want to sound like Bush.
    I can not come to terms with you Hesperando,in my opinion,you are no different then the enemies,in hadith islam,because like them,you will agree to collateral damage like it is not people you are talking about.

    Thank you.
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #85 - March 30, 2009, 03:12 AM

    Marleya, I don't doubt that there exist many harmless Muslims who pose no direct threat to me at all.  The problem is that we cannot sufficiently and reliably tell the difference anymore between them and the dangerous Muslims among them.  And secondly, by continuing to support Islam, the apparently harmless Muslims, along with their non-Muslim defenders in the West, are serving to enable the growing situation of more and more Muslims in our midst, among whom are ones plotting to mass-murder us.  It would be nice if we could pinpoint only the dangerous Muslims, but it's not that easy.  The al Qaeda Manual specifically tells its agents to act and to appear "less Islamic" -- to blend in as "moderates" while planning to mass-murder us.  What are we to do in a situation where more and more of these Muslims are posing a threat?  My #1 priority is to protect myself, my loved ones and my society.  In the course of self-defense, there is sometimes unavoidable collateral damage.  It has always been that way, it will always be that way.



    Pedophiles exist. In both societies. Let's take that example.

    Your next door neighbour could seem like a harmless, sweet 70 year old. Or, he could be a pedophile prying on the kids that live in the street.

    How would we know? Is it fair to prosecute without evidence? How do you plan to protect your children from a seemingly sweet 70 year old man next door, with the fear that he may (or may not) be a pedophile? Are you going to cast out all 70 year old men to a nearby island so they have no access to children, with the fear that they COULD be pedophiles?

    Btw, welcome Marleya Smiley
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #86 - March 30, 2009, 04:32 AM

    Aksel where did u get this picture from, i can not find the book from 1955. And I find it highly unlikely that a book in 1955 would use colored Excel charts. So either this is a fabricated graph, either a remake of an existing one.

    The data for the graph is from JM Tanner Growth at Adolescence (1st edition 1955, 2nd edition 1962) Blackwell Scientific Publishing.

    The actual graph appears here, part 2 of The Plowden Report (1967) Children and their Primary Schools.

    However Tanner should still be cited as the source of the data.

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #87 - March 30, 2009, 04:54 AM

    That graph on the change in menarche is interesting.  Let's see, in 100 years from 1830 to 1930, we see a change on that graph where menarche goes down from age 17 in 1830 to age 14 in 1930.

    How are we to extrapolate back using that graph?  Does this mean that 100 years further back, in 1730, menarche was at age 11?

    And 100 years further back from that, in 1630, menarche was at age 8? 

    1530, age 5?

    1430, age 2?

    1330, age negative 1?

    One must not confuse acute changes in health, nutrition, etc., with long-term developments of organic processes.  One slice of time in the post-Industrial age is hardly sufficient to establish the claim under consideration, that in effect menarche for 9-year-old girls was the norm in 7th century Arabia.

    At any rate, it's irrelevant to the larger problem of a religion whose millions of adherents today revere Mohammed as the "best model of conduct" for all time and as the "most perfect human", when he fucked a 9-year-old girl and beat her.  Nor is a tiny splinter movement of heretical "Koran-only" Muslims is not going to solve our problem of millions of Sunnis and Shia.

    How can we tell the difference between harmless Muslims, and dangerous Muslims?
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #88 - March 30, 2009, 05:16 AM

    Peace Aksel Ankersen

    Thank you for your nice reply Aksel.

    Hope I am not late,to answer.

    I find it disguisting,that Islam fiqh,says a nine year old girl is grown up,and ready to marry.

    There is one verse that speak of the orphans and marriage.

    4:6

    "And try orphans(as regards to their intelligence)unntil they reach the age of marriage,If you find sound judgement in them,release their property to them"

    This verse can not be speaking of young girls down to nine years old?Sound judgement is not reach at that age,I think.

    What do you think Aksel?

    Well Marleya

    Let's break the verse up:

    "And test the orphans until they reach the age of marriage."

     وابتلوا اليتامى حتى اذا بلغوا النكاح

    "Then if you perceive in them sound judgement"

    فان انستم منهم رشدا

    The "Fa" means then and the word for intellect is "Rashid".

    I.e. the judgement of maturity and the return of property comes after the orphan's attainment of the age of marriage.

    Lastly, sound judgement has nothing to do with sexual maturity, a little girl should not be given away in marriage to an adult man even if her mental age is that of an adult.

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Welcome to Marleya
     Reply #89 - March 30, 2009, 05:17 AM

    That graph on the change in menarche is interesting.  Let's see, in 100 years from 1830 to 1930, we see a change on that graph where menarche goes down from age 17 in 1830 to age 14 in 1930.

    How are we to extrapolate back using that graph?  Does this mean that 100 years further back, in 1730, menarche was at age 11?

    And 100 years further back from that, in 1630, menarche was at age 8? 

    1530, age 5?

    1430, age 2?

    1330, age negative 1?

    One must not confuse acute changes in health, nutrition, etc., with long-term developments of organic processes.  One slice of time in the post-Industrial age is hardly sufficient to establish the claim under consideration, that in effect menarche for 9-year-old girls was the norm in 7th century Arabia.

    That isn't what the graph is supposed to show, read it carefully.

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Previous page 1 2 34 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »