A lot of religious people do it though. Shaneequa is in no way a troll, yet there was a fair amount of avoidance on her part in the debate we had. Plus, I think being the lone, or almost lone, voice of Islam on an ex-muslim web site can be guaranteed to make some people feel defensive. But for all the flaws in his debating, BMZ hasn't trolled here, IMO.
First of all 2 wrongs dont make one right. Thats Tu Quoque. YOu are committing a fallacy here. Here is the definition of a troll.
An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.1)Inflammatory content
2) Controversial content
3) Irrelevant posting
I have sufficiently shown that BMZ satisfies every single criteria of being a troll. If you want more then I can provide you more proofs.There is no way he is escaping from being called a troll.
YOu are defending him using emotional appeal just like muslims defend mohhamed as paedophile by saying it was a norm those days and hence calling muhhamad a paedophile would mean every single person was a paedophile. If muhhamad satifies the definition of paedophilia he is a paedophile . Just like that BMZ satisfies every single criteria of being a troll he is a troll as 2 wrong dont make 1 right however We may ease the definition considering religious people but we cannot eliminate the criteria totally and this is where you are wrong.
Let us see whether Shaneeqa meets that criteria or not. I would say she doesnt . Evasiveness is fine and I dont call BMZ a troll for being evasive.LEts see how she is different from BMZ.
1)Now considering religious people we may ease this definition a bit but not completely.We might say posting irrelevant stuff criteria may be eased a bit and concession might be given to them but how many times ? Once twice ,thrice??
He has been shown his flaws infinite no of times and yet he keeps repeating the same irrelevant bull shit again and again.
Does Shaneeqa keep posting the same things again even when she is debunked infinite no of times?? Infact I liked her honesty when she declared that you have won the debate .Thats shows her integrity and honesty. THis is how she is different from BMZ.Another example of BMZ posting off content is bringing in Old testament when the debate is about islam thereby disrupting the flow of debate. This is a sign of a complete troll.Do you see Shaneeqa doing that even after you show her fallacy of bringing other scriptures ?
2) Do you see Shaneeqa posting Inflammatory statements just like BMZ does about anyone who disagrees with her beliefs? I can show you N no of examples where he posts offensive statements about anyone who points out flaws in his beliefs. This is a sign of a troll.Look at his recent thread . Paralysis of a kafir mind. Thats an inflammatory statement.He bloody has no point and yet he makes such accusations.
3) Do you see Shaneeqa posting controversial content? Once or twice its fine but BMZ seems to be continuously doing that.
4) Do you see Shaneeqa multinicking(BMZ nicked atleast 8-10 times on FFI) and acting as a cheer girl to those who support her religion and throwing baseless accusations against those who criticize her religion?
If any of the believers resort to the above stuff more than say 5 times he deserves to be called a troll. Religion excuse is ok for once , twice or say thrice at the max for any fact but not more than that.
Lastly how does lone muslim defendent change the fact that he is a troll? Does this automatically give me the privilege to do what a troll does?
Topic: Damnation gone?