Tailor, I will probably write to you privately at some point because being metaphysically-oriented myself I sympathize with your approach.
However, just a few comments in general. I think you would be a lot more convincing if you:
a) explained your metaphysics clearly (this is the big one).
b) acknowledged that even if people like the prophets of Israel or Muhammad, etc. were inspired by a higher consciousness or realm, they were still *human* instruments and were likely to distort that higher consciousness due to their cultural conditioning (if you've studied the phenomenology of mystical experiences and had one or two of them, I'm sure you know how easy it is for the human ego to hijack, distort and diminish a mystical experience ... within seconds, literally) ... I like your interpretations but it is very hard for me to believe that Muhammad or his companions, at the level of the material realm, understood or believed many of the things you talk about.
I can see your work as an attempt to "transmute" the Islamic tradition, which I'm all for, but it's hard for me to deny that the *world-historical manifestation* of the Islamic revelation (and of most religions in general) was far from perfect.
c) acknowledged that no religion is perfect, and that every religion, while it had its heyday and golden age, soon ossified into fixed forms and dogmas, and whatever inspiration was behind such religions, it soon withdrew as a result of this dogmatism -- virtually every religion lost touch with its "spirit" and with the "living Divine presence" of spiritual experience and became obsessed with "creeds" and "laws". Do you make a distinction between religion and spirituality? As a Vedantist, for me this distinction is absolutely paramount. Religion is the watering down of spirituality, as far as I and most modern Vedantist philosophers are concerned.
And the big thing of course is that we don't really need external prophets or religions to experience the Divine ... what we need is already there within us, though studying the lives of other spiritually-inspired people can certainly be an aid (and I'll grant that religions provided an initial but immature and very culturally-conditioned starting point for the human exploration of spirituality). I actually started having major spiritual experiences long after I had already left Islam. There is hardly any acknowledgment among Muslims that people can leave Islam and continue to live ethically and spiritually very rich lives, whether they are atheists/agnostics or metaphysically-oriented mystics. (There are of course exceptions. I met Shaykha Fariha al-Jerrahi, a Sufi teacher in NYC, and told her that I had left Islam, and she was not even slightly defensive ... her reaction was along the lines of: "Well, obviously ... if you're stuck in a dogmatic framework you have to tear it down before you can experience the Divine.")
d) explained where you stand on the role of agnosticism/atheism/skepticism in spiritual growth and development ... this is where the Abrahamic traditions run into trouble, because they see disbelief as something evil, whereas arguably the Eastern religions had schools of thought that saw atheism/agnosticism, etc. as valid spiritual paths.
e) dealt with some of the objections to Muhammad raised by people who are NOT atheists, but in fact mystics themselves. You will find a brief critique of Muhammad in Vivekananda's "Raja Yoga" in which he claims that Muhammad was no doubt inspired, but he was untrained and he had some fanatic tendencies which people can develop when they stumble onto spiritual experiences without adequate yogic training (I believe Jung calls it "ego inflation").
In fact my biggest beef with Muhammad and the Islamic religion is the hyperbolic and exaggerated claim that Muhammad was the last prophet and the Quran the final revelation, which you seem to support in your video but which, I suspect, hinges on your definition of "prophecy" and how it's different from regular spiritual experiences (I don't understand that part myself). This claim to being the "final" prophet (as if Divine self-disclosure is something that can ever end) is utter nonsense, given that people are having spiritual experiences to this day, given that a gazillion spiritual teachers have come after Muhammad, many of them with spiritual messages that are VASTLY superior to the Islamic religion (or even other previous religions for that matter), *including* Sufi teachers themselves (I am thinking here of people like Hazrat Inayat Khan for instance).
As Ann Druyan, the wife of the late Carl Sagan said, the problem is not with people who believe in God or claim to know God, but with people who seem to think that they already know everything there is to know about God or who think that absolute truth has already been revealed in the past.
One thing I have noticed about Islam is a total lack of "process" perspectives (with the exception of heretic/heterodox universalist Sufi Orders like those of Hazrat Inayat Khan), i.e. a recognition that the universe is evolving, in process, and hence the manifestation of Divine revelation is also subject to change according to changing times and changing human nature.
Topic: It's Metaphorical!