Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Yesterday at 09:40 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
January 09, 2025, 09:33 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
January 09, 2025, 01:34 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
January 06, 2025, 09:50 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
December 27, 2024, 12:20 PM

Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

What's happened to the fo...
December 25, 2024, 02:29 AM

Berlin car crasher
by zeca
December 21, 2024, 11:10 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Some Honest Opinions:

 (Read 7774 times)
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Some Honest Opinions:
     OP - May 14, 2009, 04:18 PM

    Hello everyone! Smiley

    I am not going to begin a post with "I'm quitting," because in case I do not, its poor forum etiquette to announce such intentions. However, I do not believe in being dishonest about my opinions or stating stuff that I do not believe in. There've been quite a few posters who've said that I over react, my new turn of mind makes them disappointed, scared etc-so I do feel that I need to be upfront about what I do & do not believe in. I would like it, of course, if I am respected & accepted with all my opinions, but in case I am not, I don't think its good to pretend because I honestly value you guys, this forum & the friendships that I've formed here too much to be dishonest just for the sake of being appreciated.

    First of all, when I spoke of understanding the fears of those who're skeptical of Islam- I did not mean, nor do I intend to sympathise with the White supremacists, those who feel that U.K., U.S.A. or any other region strictly has & should continue having one culture  & one religious heritage,the fundie Christians who feel all other faiths are unacceptable, the racists or any other people with extremist agendas. I do not sympathise with those who dislike the Arabic or Turkish language, other skin colors, other places of worship on their streets,other cuisines & so forth any more than I sympathise with those who would seek to enforce Shariah. These people really need to change their outlooks.

    I did & do mean those who have a dislike restricted to  Islam & fears of extremist Islam & I'm not apologetic about that opinion. Again its not true, as some have implied, that I have no idea of what I am speaking about because I have to rely on news agencies-I don't suppose aliadiere has much more idea of Israel apart from news agencies too, but thats' beside the point. I have been to Britain, more than once, my aunt-Adil's mom & her family lived there for years & only moved back to India a year back when Adil's paternal grandpa passed away to look after the family business.Adil is 8 years older to me, he was about 21 when he left Britain. I have lived in her house more than one summer vacation, for about four months of my life. I've seen my cousin Adil, he's honest about the desire of wanting Shariah for British Muslims-an idea he apparently shares with 40% young Brits, supports compulsory veiling in Islamic nations, thinks blasphemy ought ot be punishable etc. And I've seen others with similar views.

    Also, my experiences might be limited, so are everyone else's on Earth. I remember someone remarking on this forum that if Rushdie's developed some Islamophobic tendencies, there might be valid reasons in his case, similarly I think that for loads of people globally, there're pretty good reasons to develop some such tendencies-& Islamic discriminatory laws, terrorist attacks followed by conspiracy theories which negate the pain of the dead & mutilated & their dear ones-are contributary factors.

    I have also seen people living in Britain who aren't Whites, nor racists or religious bigots, but who nevertheless dislike Islam. The only Fire Temple of Europe is located in London-I've been there, met many Zoroastrians, many of them come from Iran. For these people-they don't believe in wearing a headscarf or full sleeved clothes-either for religious or morality reasons-so such a law imposed by the Islamic Republic in Iran meant for them accepting a lie, participating in a lie, living a lie. The same is true for Iranian Bahais.These people in all probability aren't White supremacists-coz they aren't White, I don't think they hope to convert Europe or the world to their faith or their culture-especially not Zoroastrians, but their dislike is based on very real reasons.

    I'm not even going into the restrictions placed on proselytization or conversion in Iran-but the situation isn't very pleasant in a significant number of Islamic nations. In Malaysia- a Muslim can only apostasise with great legal difficulty & anyone marrying a Muslim is obliged to convert to Islam.Its the same situation in Dubai & many other places.  If Muslims in Singapore don't have such laws as Malaysia does, its not because they're a whole lot liberal, its simply because they don't have the numerical strength to enforce their opinion, rather like Prophet Muhammad lacked such ability in his early years of preaching.

    Also, I don't think these stuff can simply be dismissed as "We all know the laws are different in Muslim countries." If the laws are different-its because the Muslims enforce & continue to retain such discriminatory laws. I don't suppose every Muslim who migrates out of nations with such discriminatory laws is a born again liberal, most are like the people who remain behind in Islamic nations. I'm not accusing anyone's family & friends here just like if I claim that U.S.A. in 1950 was racist isn't accusing any individual elderly American's family & friends. Indeed, enough has happened in Europe to give people such a fear & impression. There have been innumerable terrorist attacks in Algeria by Algerian Islamists, there's been a terrorist attack in Paris about a decade back, there's been terrorist acts in Pak, there's been sucessful & attempted attacks by Muslims of Pakistani origin in U.K., attacks in Madrid, in Netherlands etc. There're blasphemy laws in many Islamic nations, after the cartoon incident, Muslims marched out in droves with slogans of beheading, killing & butchering.

    Even on our forum, we've had people like Baal who really isn't a racist, who's fond of Chinese food, his Chinese boss, other aspects of multiculturalism. If he had a very bad time in Egypt & he's witnessed such incidents in Europe & his birthplace of Egypt(much of it on media, like I have-no human possess the ability to know everything firsthand), its obvious that some people will develop an antipathy. Its not really fair, nor true to label all such folks monoculturalists or raical\religious bigots. I have lurked on another forum, although I never posted. In that particular forum, not an FFI-JW type one, there was a Dutch man who was irreligious but disliked Islam much more than other faiths, he was an ex Catholic & he'd written something to the effect of, "I ditched my Catholic faith when I realised what garbage was there in the OT," & readily admitted that the OT was as bad as the Quran. But he was especially critical of Islam, its unneccessary demands etc. He also had a wife of African origin, so its not possible to consider him either a racist bigot or an evangelist. I used to lurk there for many months & this man was really regular. Out here, brucepig too isn't in all probability a racist, he doesn't come across at all like that in any posts, he dislikes aspects of the Bible & I remember him saying on a thread that Buddhism had superceded OT morality long before Jesus, also he said Moses was a very immoral man-he too dislikes Islam.

    I'm very aware that there are plenty of those who oppose Islam who can well be termed both White supremacists as well as well as Christian supremacists or evangelists, but its an erronous assumption to label all those who dislike Islam as such-thats' just like the Muslim statement that all those who dislike Islam are Jews- or even reformists like Ataturk was a Jew!

    Many non Muslims who hail from Muslim nations or have visited such nations have seen how their rights are limited in those nations-I do agree that the majority of Muslims are decent law abiding folks, but unfortunately its a present reality that in many cases when a nation is full of Muslims, the rights of apostasy, intermarriage & sometimes even clothing gets legally restricted.

    Again, I repeat, I am not accusing or slandering anyone's friends & family here & I absolutely do not endorse or support any programmes of mass surveillance & deportation, nor do I support the idea of ridiculing & belittling anyone  because of their faith or lack thereof-& this is true for Muslims just like anyone else.

    The next issue was that many dislike not only how Islam is practiced, but slandered the faith & its Prophet too & that quite a few people are dogmatically anti Islam. There are a few good stuff in Islamic theology like banning killing baby girls, a few good stuff in its history like the stories of Arabian Nights & good translation(& some innovation) skills, & a few good stuff in the faith in the present day like the lower(reported?) AIDS rates in many African Muslim nations, due to acceptance of condoms. Here, I won't incluse nations which stone like Somalia, because I don't think its any great achievement to keep AIDS rates down, if stoning is one deterrant to sex, but countries like Senegal & Mali certainly qualify.

    But here again the unfortunate fact remains that there's really no reason to adore Islam, especially in light of the grandoise claims it makes on the world. Islam is the only faith, along with Christianity, which claims that I will go to Hell for Eternity if I don't accept it as true. It claims that all of us are actually born Muslims & we simply "revert" to Islam, when we convert to Islam. It divides the world into two- a Dar ul Islam & a Dar ul Harb or House of War-which no doubt shows how they believe conflicts between Muslims & others are going to be resolved. It also believes that its the One True faith to which all human beings can & should adhere-or else pay jizya, if one is a People of the Book, or be forcibly converted in case one is an idolator. The only other faith to make such grandoise claims is Christianity, but there are quite a few advantages one can readily get from Xtianity. For one there are some terrific convent schools worldwide, even in many non Xtian nations-where infidels can study. The ultimate hope is of course, that these infidels convert & are "saved" but in the meantime, it does do a lot of good to the infidel's life.

    Such schools are very popular in Bangladesh, where I've lived, very popular in India & very popular in Senegal-again I know from first hand experience. There are also hospitals & other benefits. Of course, Xtianity has done a great many violent stuff in the past, its still doing some unpleasant stuff like not allowing condoms, child witches in Nigeria etc-but I can readlily also mention these benefits. The fact is also that in even pretty religious nations of the West like U.S.A., inspite of many crazy fundies, the non Muslims thrive happily-can migrate, convert, intermarry & everything else. It was American laws, which allowed someone like awais to convert to Islam not long after 9\11, give dawa & so on.

    I've criticised Xtianity here as well, along with all faiths, but I wonder if so many great schools in India, Bangladesh, Senegal & elsewhere could be run by secular authorities today-if Xtianity abruptly disappeared. I do not subscribe to the notion that one must criticise all faiths equally, or that they're all equal-just like I don't believe that the avarage man who lives in Tunisia is the same as the avarage man who joins the Taliban-although both might exhibit some degree of patriarchy.

    As someone who's read the Quran, I haven't found it some great repository of wishdom either-quite the opposite, further there's pretty little originality to entertain me. The stories are garbled additions of the OT & NT, nothing like the Illiad or the Mahabharata which entertain me. Apart from the plagiarisms, there's Muhammad's additions & his life. I find Muhammad a very unpleasant figure, who compares extremely poorly with either the Buddha or Jesus. I find many of his acts most objectionable. I find the early history of Islam-Muhammad's forced conversions, the brutal suppression of the ridda wars, the inter Sahaba wars & the jihad over the most vibrant, successful societies of the day very unpleasant.

    Personally as well, there's little I can appreciate. Islam first over ran the land of Iran, from where my ancestors fled. Long time later, they fled Pakistan again after the Partition, leaving all their property behind.

    Even with someone like Robert Spencer, whose attitude I do not admire-his grandparents were survivors of the Armenian Massacre, a massacre where upto a million lost their lives, all their hard earned property & had to start from scratch. This massacre is not so much as acknowledged. Needless to say, it really doesn't give one much basis to appreciate Islam. Or the long slavery by Arabs, when the Continent of Africa  was robbed of its manpower & slaves were brutally castrated-when Zawahiri calls Obama the derogatory term for both Blacks & slaves today, its no basis for people to like Islam. If Robert Spencer points out that the doctrine of peace gets the upper hand in Xtianity via the NT, but violence gets the upper hand in Islam via abrogation-I can't accuse him of lying theologically.It might be true that Jesus' crucifixtion stopped him from being violent-but whatever the reason, his portrayal is pretty likeable. Respect has to be earned-it cannot be demanded with nothing to show for it. I totally respect the Buddha's opinion that we all have the right to free thought, along with many other Buddhist teachings.

    Next about the fact that others are also to blame. I do believe that its true that it takes two to tango when two people are at a conflict, but I do not believe that everyone can be blamed. I do not think that its all others' fault that both Thailand & Philippines are attacked by mujahideen regularly, when they give full religious equality to Muslims, but even though Malaysia doesn't-the non Muslims bear it silently. I do not think that the Balinese & the Australian backpackers brought the two bomb blasts upon themselves. If there are religion inspired conflicts in far too many locations involving Muslims- not over say Basque independence but explicitly religion inspired & the religion in question happens to be Islam-I can't go around blaming everyone, especially not when countries like Thailand\Philippines\Singapore give full rights but face successful or attempted attacks, but Malaysia denies such rights but doesn't. I also don't think any country, whether Israel, India, U.S.A. or others should fail in their duty to protect their citizens-this doesn't include an Iraq war, but it also does not incluse taking Muslim atrocities lying down.

    There are quite a few people who've suffered immensely, received nothing & even their sorrows are explained away through conspiracy theories. I dislike it if many people die anywhere & I see a majority of Muslims explain it away as an American\Zionist\local conspiracy-the same Muslims who take to the streets to protest Motoons with death threats, or Israel's counter attack with praise of Hitler.

    As for Islamic reformation-well it'll be great if & when that completely happens, but till then I don't think its fair to expect the world-especially those who've been at the receiving end-to go ga ga with either praise or sympathy. I think Jewish Scriptures are some of the most horried(although its not proselytizing,doesn't demand global submission, has universal salvation) but the Jews themselves have contributed immensely compared to their tiny population-just .3% of our world.

    When I or an Arab or Iranian Muslim uses Google, its invented by two Jews, when we use the T.V. remote control, its a Jewish invention, so is the polio vaccine, so are the jeans which a more modern headscarf wearer might wear with a full sleeved shirt , so's the lipstick-& many others, besides if I tell them that their Scriptures are awful IMO, they'll allow that. They have also lived in absolute peace with other Indian polytheists for over 2000 years, they had a great relation with Zoroastrian Iran-King Cyrus is revered by them. They might have gone overboard many times in Israel recently-& I do sympathise with those who've lost their lands in Israel but its difficult to really appreciate folks who teach their grandchildren to hate  with inspiration from Islamic Scriptures instead of teaching them to move on-like my grandparents did. I support the right of anyone-including Muslims to criticise Israel, like any other state, but I do not support those who had little scruples turning all the Jews out of their countries(who now form 40% of Israel's population, who also lost all their lands & property) but didn't give many of the Palestinians a home & kept them hating Jews citing Islamic reasons(especially rich nations like Saudi).

    Many people have had to flee many regions-70000 Buddhists have fled Southern Thailand, & a similar number have fled South Philippines as well, that doesn't give the other people worldwide belonging to these faiths the rights to castigate Muslims, nor do they do so.

    Again, I repeat that I do not hate individual Muslims, but I haven't found much reason, either in Islamic Scriptures, or Islamic practices, or in my personal experiences to find much respect for the faith in theory or in practice. I remember reading BMZ claiming that Islam came to end idolatry & trinity, but apart from the obvious disrespect(& possible danger) this statement shows for idolators & trinitarians-who might together form at least twice the population of Muslims, this is no reason for me to respect the faith.

    I do not want to deny any Muslims anywhere on earth their basic rights-they are all as entitled to these rights as anyone else.


    Its not fair to accuse us all of biases, over reactions simply coz we differ in our views. If it was asked to people if they hate BNP & find nothing good in the party, I'm sure many would agree. If someone like Baal has come from a country which holds views like that, its all right to air such views. Nor is it right to assume that we're all ignorant morons who have no idea what we're talking about, if we express anger that a vast majority of Muslims believe that a dastardly terrorist attack was a plot. Its also not fair if an obviously Islamist attack like the Mumbai massacre is dismissed as "gunmen" without mentioning Islam-which is what I remember an atheist neilmarr objecting to.

    Lastly, I think we all deserve the right of free speech here, when we're not supporting torture & deportation or some such stuff. I must apologise to speaklow today, for my past misbehavior-although he\she's probably left. I'm truly sorry.

    P.S.: I'm aware that this is a truly long post, & if anyone wants to skip it, or move it to Rants, feel free to do so.

     thnkyu



    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #1 - May 14, 2009, 05:01 PM

    I enjoyed reading your post for what it is worth

    I have very little to say in regards to what you wrote seeing i agree with alot of it.

    Blind faith is an ironic gift to return to the Creator of human intelligence

  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #2 - May 14, 2009, 05:29 PM

    Hey Rashna,

    I think you've been misjudged. Whether it was your fault or not, I cannot tell. I sometimes feel that the forum is getting too PC, which is rather annoying. I come here to vent about the Islamic outrages and injustices that I observe, and I often find myself applying self-censorship.

    Islam is a pile of shit. Don't worry if you feel the same.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #3 - May 14, 2009, 05:30 PM

    I know you don't support extreme xenophobic views, Rashna.

    Don't take internet discussions too seriously (and that is a trap I fall into too). We discuss, debate, argue, agree, differ etc... That's way it goes.

    I always enjoy your posts and I hope I will be able to continue to benefit from your perspective.  Afro
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #4 - May 14, 2009, 05:37 PM

    Don't get upset about people disagreeing with you! I think one of the best things about being a non-muslim is that you can have your own opinion and give your own opinion without being ostracised or banned! You are certainly a formidable opponent and you can hold your own in a debate!
    I just think people just took offense to a few of your statements which unintentionally sounded quite offensive and that was pointed out to you. Don't worry about it and don't leave.

    Religion - The hot potato that looked delicious but ended up burning your mouth!

    Knock your head on the ground, don't be miserly in your prayers, listen to your Sidi Sheikh, Allahu Akbar! - Lounes Matoub
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #5 - May 14, 2009, 05:58 PM

    Wow!  That was a long post.  Interesting, though and much I agree with, bits I don't agree with.   Rashna, have you ever seen an Internet forum where everyone agrees with each other?  Its boring - every thread is the OP followed by "well said, I totally agree" , " me too", "yes, me three", etc.  There's no danger of that happening here  Tongue, so I hope you stick around and carry on arguing your point of view.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #6 - May 14, 2009, 06:31 PM


    First of all, when I spoke of understanding the fears of those who're skeptical of Islam- I did not mean, nor do I intend to sympathise with the White supremacists, those who feel that U.K., U.S.A. or any other region strictly has & should continue having one culture  & one religious heritage,the fundie Christians who feel all other faiths are unacceptable, the racists or any other people with extremist agendas. I do not sympathise with those who dislike the Arabic or Turkish language, other skin colors, other places of worship on their streets,other cuisines & so forth any more than I sympathise with those who would seek to enforce Shariah. These people really need to change their outlooks.

    Welcome Rashna to the wonderful world of Burning Strawmen and Tu Coques.

    This is how it went:
    Islame stated that laws are only a reflection of the sentiment of people (while he ignored the effect of allowing those 'sentiments' unchecked in the west).

    To clarify the hole in the statement he made, you indicated to the effect that skinheads moving fro one place to another will reflect their skinhead sentiments as they establish themselves.

    In came Aliadiere with the Strawman, accusing you of comparing muslims with white suppositories.

    My advice to you Rashna is to not rock the boat too hard to make your point. You wanted to use a vivid and strong (shocking) example to make your point. So you used white supremacists  (I used suppositories). Your example, being logically valid made sense to some, but it still backfired on you. For all the traction the example gave you to move your point forward, the example just caused too much friction with some.

    Sometimes less is more. Here is an example of something I wanted to say in the above post but I refrained, i am only writing it for your benefit, to see what you should *not* do:

    ..and it is true that, to me, the koran offers a worse ideology, then the ideology of 'battle of the races' that the skinhead ideolgy offers, but still I do not think you should have compared hthe...

    Always, there will always be plenty of other examples, that could support your point, without the need for shock. And to be honest, although Aliadiere did commit a logical error, in the spirit of the subject, and on some freudian level, you possibly do see the koran teaching to be on the same level as the teachings of the 'battle of civilization' or the 'battle of races', 'them vs us', and Aliadiere was addressing that.

    Unfair from Aliadiere, but, it is his right to defend himself from random opinion.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #7 - May 14, 2009, 06:37 PM

    Hey Rashna,

    I think you've been misjudged. Whether it was your fault or not, I cannot tell. I sometimes feel that the forum is getting too PC, which is rather annoying. I come here to vent about the Islamic outrages and injustices that I observe, and I often find myself applying self-censorship.

    Islam is a pile of shit. Don't worry if you feel the same.

    I thought you said islame is a pile of shit, i had to do a double-take to realize you wrote islam. I find it funny now how quickly i got angry for this half-second when i thought you said islame is a pile of shit. And I am generally very slow to anger and very thick-skinned.



    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #8 - May 14, 2009, 06:38 PM


    First of all, when I spoke of understanding the fears of those who're skeptical of Islam- I did not mean, nor do I intend to sympathise with the White supremacists, those who feel that U.K., U.S.A. or any other region strictly has & should continue having one culture  & one religious heritage,the fundie Christians who feel all other faiths are unacceptable, the racists or any other people with extremist agendas. I do not sympathise with those who dislike the Arabic or Turkish language, other skin colors, other places of worship on their streets,other cuisines & so forth any more than I sympathise with those who would seek to enforce Shariah. These people really need to change their outlooks.

    Welcome Rashna to the wonderful world of Burning Strawmen and Tu Coques.

    This is how it went:
    Islame stated that laws are only a reflection of the sentiment of people (while he ignored the effect of allowing those 'sentiments' unchecked in the west).

    To clarify the hole in the statement he made, you indicated to the effect that skinheads moving fro one place to another will reflect their skinhead sentiments as they establish themselves.

    In came Alidiere with the Strawman, accusing you of comparing muslims with white suppositories.

    My advice to you Rashna is to not rock the boat too hard to make your point. You wanted to use a vivid and strong (shocking) example to make your point. So you used white supremacists  (I used suppositories). Your example, being logically valid made sense to some, but it still backfired on you. For all the traction the example gave you to move your point forward, the example just caused too much friction with some.

    Sometimes less is more. Here is an example of something I wanted to say in the above post but I refrained, i am only writing it for your benefit, to see what you should *not* do:

    ..and it is true that, to me, the koran offers a worse ideology, then the ideology of 'battle of the races' that the skinhead ideolgy offers, but still I do not think you should have compared hthe...

    Always, there will always be plenty of other examples, that could support your point, without the need for shock. And to be honest, although Alidiere did commit a logical error, in the spirit of the subject, and on some freudian level, you possibly do see the koran teaching to be on the same level as the teachings of the 'battle of civilization' or the 'battle of races', 'them vs us', and Alidiere was addressing that.

    Unfair from Alidiere, but, it is his right to defend himself from random opinion.



    What I objected to was when Rashna compared how native Brits feel about Muslims to how Black South Africans felt about White South Africans during the Apartheid. I would hardly call that "unfair".

    But the point is, Rashna made her points, me and hassan and islame objected to them and made our points. That is the nature of a discussion. People talk, people have differing views, and then get on with it. There is absolutely no point whatsoever getting upset. As Cheetah pointed out, if everyone agreed, it would be pretty boring.

    Religion - The hot potato that looked delicious but ended up burning your mouth!

    Knock your head on the ground, don't be miserly in your prayers, listen to your Sidi Sheikh, Allahu Akbar! - Lounes Matoub
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #9 - May 14, 2009, 06:41 PM


    First of all, when I spoke of understanding the fears of those who're skeptical of Islam- I did not mean, nor do I intend to sympathise with the White supremacists, those who feel that U.K., U.S.A. or any other region strictly has & should continue having one culture  & one religious heritage,the fundie Christians who feel all other faiths are unacceptable, the racists or any other people with extremist agendas. I do not sympathise with those who dislike the Arabic or Turkish language, other skin colors, other places of worship on their streets,other cuisines & so forth any more than I sympathise with those who would seek to enforce Shariah. These people really need to change their outlooks.

    Welcome Rashna to the wonderful world of Burning Strawmen and Tu Coques.

    This is how it went:
    Islame stated that laws are only a reflection of the sentiment of people (while he ignored the effect of allowing those 'sentiments' unchecked in the west).

    To clarify the hole in the statement he made, you indicated to the effect that skinheads moving fro one place to another will reflect their skinhead sentiments as they establish themselves.

    In came Alidiere with the Strawman, accusing you of comparing muslims with white suppositories.

    My advice to you Rashna is to not rock the boat too hard to make your point. You wanted to use a vivid and strong (shocking) example to make your point. So you used white supremacists  (I used suppositories). Your example, being logically valid made sense to some, but it still backfired on you. For all the traction the example gave you to move your point forward, the example just caused too much friction with some.

    Sometimes less is more. Here is an example of something I wanted to say in the above post but I refrained, i am only writing it for your benefit, to see what you should *not* do:

    ..and it is true that, to me, the koran offers a worse ideology, then the ideology of 'battle of the races' that the skinhead ideolgy offers, but still I do not think you should have compared hthe...

    Always, there will always be plenty of other examples, that could support your point, without the need for shock. And to be honest, although Alidiere did commit a logical error, in the spirit of the subject, and on some freudian level, you possibly do see the koran teaching to be on the same level as the teachings of the 'battle of civilization' or the 'battle of races', 'them vs us', and Alidiere was addressing that.

    Unfair from Alidiere, but, it is his right to defend himself from random opinion.



    What I objected to was when Rashna compared how native Brits feel about Muslims to how Black South Africans felt about White South Africans during the Apartheid. I would hardly call that "unfair".

    But the point is, Rashna made her points, me and hassan and islame objected to them and made our points. That is the nature of a discussion. People talk, people have differing views, and then get on with it. There is absolutely no point whatsoever getting upset. As Cheetah pointed out, if everyone agreed, it would be pretty boring.

    Ya? well I think the lasagna monger is wrong.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #10 - May 14, 2009, 06:43 PM


    Ya? well I think the lasagna monger is wrong.



    como?

    Religion - The hot potato that looked delicious but ended up burning your mouth!

    Knock your head on the ground, don't be miserly in your prayers, listen to your Sidi Sheikh, Allahu Akbar! - Lounes Matoub
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #11 - May 14, 2009, 06:55 PM

    I thought you said islame is a pile of shit

    Lol. I have lotsa respect for IsLame.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #12 - May 14, 2009, 07:22 PM

    I thought you said islame is a pile of shit

    Lol. I have lotsa respect for IsLame.

    Cheers Zaephon, same goes for you too.

    I cannot understand why everyone keeps going on about the issue being sensitivity over Islam.  Rubbish.  For the record Islam is less valid than a pile of horse poo, and less useful (at least you can use the horse poo as fertiliser)

    The problem we had was implying the muslims come to the West to impregnate the inhabitants and spread Islam, thus most Muslims including my family.  Totally absurd statement and factually incorrect - the reality is that they were financial immigrants.

    As far as I am concerned you can come here and criticise Islam as much as you like, with as much venom as you like, but dont turn that onto innocent people - that is where the line is crossed.  Baal, Zaephon et al - I dont feel you ever do that, but I did feel Rashna is in danger of going that way.  Those statements wont even be allowed on the BNP manifesto, let alone here.

    However I suspect it is a knee-jerk reaction to perhaps her cousins in UK who she may not have got on with, and assumes the rest are like that.  A few perhaps, but certainly not on the scale Rashna thinks it is.

    However I have enjoyed your presence here and it is a shame for you to want to go on the basis of just one day's posts.  How else will we be able to verify false hadiths without you?




    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #13 - May 14, 2009, 07:24 PM

    I thought you said islame is a pile of shit, i had to do a double-take to realize you wrote islam. I find it funny now how quickly i got angry for this half-second when i thought you said islame is a pile of shit. And I am generally very slow to anger and very thick-skinned.

    Thanks Baal, I got your back too.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #14 - May 14, 2009, 07:58 PM

    The problem we had was implying the muslims come to the West to impregnate the inhabitants and spread Islam, thus most Muslims including my family.  Totally absurd statement and factually incorrect - the reality is that they were financial immigrants.


    I did say that the main reason they come is financial-richer nation, maybe pounds to send back home, nicer streets, malls, all that stuff-the same reason anyone moves from a poorer nation to a richer one. I did say that was the primary reason, perhaps the only reason they arrive. But once they do arrive, some do hope that more & more people in the West adopt the faith-there's nothing wrong with that, Islam is probably one of my least favorite faiths, in both theory & practice, but if anyone wants to spread a faith & if anyone wants to adopt a faith-its personal choice.

    Thus the reason a Pakistani or a Moroccan might decide to migrate to the West might be purely financial, but once in the West, a desire might be to convert as well. A significant % of Americans identify themselves as wanting to not only practice but also spread Xtianity, Islam too is as much of a missionary faith as Xtianity is-both hope to convert the world, Islam infact presupposes we're all apostates!

    So an American who passionately believes in Xtianity might well settle somewhere for his job, but he'll use every opportunity to preach his faith as well. Similarly, when Muslims migrate to either the West or elsewhere, they also might want to give dawah to the folks there-even if they came for purely economic reasons. Even awais I remember wrote of his dawah giving days. Besides they'll also bring their ingrained religious beliefs to whichever place they go-I doubt Muslims or anyone else leaves their faith at home. A fundie Xtian who believes non believers burn in Hell after death, even good non believers, will probably not immediately change his mind if he goes to Buddhist Thailand where the predominant faith of Buddhism has universal salvation, although the society & its attitudes might make him eventually do so. Similarly Muslim migrants in the West, who bring their ingrained beliefs that Muslim men can marry non Muslim women but not vice versa will not drop those opinions in a hurry even if time does change them.

    Likewise, even a purely economic migrant who believes blaspheming Muhammad is objectionable will continue to hold those beliefs.

    Thats' why some non Muslims might dislike those attitudes- they might legitimately feel that if Muslim migrants who migrate for economic reasons are free to give dawa here, they also should be free to do so in Islamic nations. If Muslims can encourage some non Muslims to convert to Islam, then others should have the same rights to make Muslims quit Islam.

    Clearly this is often not the situation in Islamic majority nations. Even if the purpose of migrants arriving are economic which is the reason in practically all cases, Islam is a proselytizing faith, many Muslims see it as their duty to proselytize if presented with such an opportunity, they consider apostasy unacceptable & there might be legitimate dislike about these Islamic double standards amongst non Muslims. If Muslims throw a mighty fit over Motoons, even if they're all economic migrants, but non Muslim Westerners enjoy stuff like Monty Python   Monty python or the Da Vinci Code, if the cartoonist has to go into hiding as a result then there might be legitimate worries what an increasing number of Islamic economic migrants might do to the freedoms of speech they took for granted. If Rushdie is threatened, some might be worried about the future of movies like "The Last Temptation of Christ, " which they'd happily enjoyed.An increasing number might come purely for making money & bettering their living standards, but once in the West-if they demonstrate such Motoon rage-its really unpleasant for the rest of the folks, especially those who're knowledgable about the lack of such freedoms in many Islamic nations. If a Theo Van Gogh loses his life brutally at the hands of an economic migrant living off welfare, others who want to criticise anything & everything under the sun might dislike such attitudes.Many such folk might be bigots, but many might also be genuinely religiously irreverent,living together & having kids out of wedlock, alcohol loving, bisexual, nudists types-who feel concerned that the freedoms they took for granted might be restricted or worse completely prohibited in future- as it currently is in many Islamic nations.

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #15 - May 14, 2009, 08:34 PM

    There are two types of non Muslims out in the West who might dislike Islam.

    One of course, is the racist\religious monoculturalist bigot-whom I abhor. I know there are many such types, I've read about their posts in the BNP site.

    Then there is another type as well. The kind who's a genuine liberal & the West has a fair number of them currently-who lives with his partner & their kids born out of wedlock, whose lesbian sister is married to the woman of her dreams & they have adopted a couple of kids together, who feels religion is all bullshit & loves cracking irreverent jokes about Christ, Moses & Muhammad, whose wife goes nude on nude beaches & who loves his alcohol & nightclubs & feels his kids should be free to wed\bed\live in with anyone irrespective of faith. 

    These stuff aren't readily accepted amongst Islamic populations anywhere in the world- even Senegal for all its virtues is terribly homophobic, when I say terribly I mean it, its far more homophobic than India or Bangladesh.Such a man might be horrified by the Motoon demonstrations, the Muslim assumption that marriage means conversion & certainly no sex out of wedlock.

    Also, while these Muslims, like all other migrants come almost completely with economic reasons, Islam is a faith which has often, even in the present date sought to impose its view of right & wrong conduct on those it had the ability to do so-unlike a sect like the Amish.It has sought to make laws of marriage, dress & conduct as per the faiths' demands & incidents like the Motoon rage,the hatred of Rushdie, the firebombing of the office of the publishers' of the Ayesha novel or Theo Van Gogh's murder show that(economic) migrants still hold such views & do seek to impose them through violent means if they can. While fundamentalist Xtianity or other extremist also do this-its a current reality that Islam does this to a far greater extent.

    I tremendously dislike the first type of bigot, but the second type of man does have some legitimate concerns. I did not claim that Muslims come to the West solely or primarily with a plan of taking over by devious means-but the fact remains that a singificant number assume that no one should blaspheme Muhammad, apostasise or marry someone of the same sex & they have often violently treied to impose these opinions on others. Also, once migrants are in the West, some Muslims do hope that the West submits to Islam, like Xtianity hopes with non Xtians-& submission to Islam is often accompanied with discriminatory laws against those who differ with their vision.Xtianity has been successfully marginalised & reformed so that its become much tamer. A liberal irreligious might dislike Islamic demands just like racist bigots do.

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #16 - May 14, 2009, 08:55 PM

    I also did not say that Muslims come with devious intentions of takeover through conversions, marriages, reproductions etc- thats' not what I said in the bit you kept quoting.

    What I said was-

    Muslims come to the West-fact. So do others btw-Buddhists, Sikhs,Hindus, Africans of whatever faiths etc

    Increase-fact too, so do many other migrants again.

    I did not add, state or imply in that multiple times quoted bit that its all a part of a concerted effort at takeover.

    However, there might be legitimate worries given that they restrict freedoms in Muslim majority nations & have demonstrated horried behaviour post the Motoons, regarding Rushdie, Ayesha novel etc. Islam is also a faith which seeks to convert the world & economic migrants might also hold this ambition even if they come for the money & better life. It also often stops apostasy, blasphemy, homosexuality & so on. This is a current reality in Muslim states.

    I do know that non Muslims have come to this forum before claiming Muslims are all part of a global plan of takeover & domination, & some missionary types have come here too but that really doesn't mean that every non Muslim here who has a faith-especially Xtianity is a missionary or everyone who says that Muslims in the West or other non Muslim nations enjoy freedoms they deny others in Islamic nations which might displease non Muslims, or that Islamic economic migrants in the West have often demonstrated unruly behaviour which justly shocks & displeases non Muslims who aren't all racist nutters is saying that they are part of a ploy of domination.

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #17 - May 14, 2009, 09:12 PM

    @Islame,
    Another thing-since I had written in the post you kept quoting & requoting Islame that "Muslims come to the West, increase in number..." I might very well have written about another group say, "Hispanics come to the U.S.A., increase in number..."

    Both are facts, both these people(amongst many others) migrate & increase-these are factually correct claims & neither statement implies anything in the least devious. Writing Hispanics come to United States & increase doesn't automatically imply that those Hispanics hope to wipe out the WASP population-it simply states that they migrate & increase, same with my statement regarding Muslims.

    However, in case of Hispanics, while racists might dislike them, not many liberals will. There's little reason to assume that they'd impose dress codes, ban out of wedlock births(majority of their births are out of wedlock in USA), disallow religious freedoms etc-Mexico has the same religious freedoms as USA does.

    In the case of Muslims racists will certainly dislike them & I don't support those racists, but there are plenty of reasons liberals might dislike them too!

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #18 - May 14, 2009, 09:25 PM

    The way you refer to Muslims as a single group of people that impose their ideals on others is simply not true.  It applies to Islamic nations, because they attempt to follow the scriptures.  But to assume each Muslim, migrant or not, will do the same is where I bear issue.  Most of us here were Muslims once upon a time, and few (if any) had the ideals that you seem to think all Muslims have.

    I dont want to dissect your post again, but your language still the same as I would expect from the BJP.  Incidentally are you a supporter?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #19 - May 14, 2009, 10:22 PM

     What's the BJP ? Is it another one of those sinister jewish groups ?
    I don't think Rashna is treating all muslims as a single group , but there is a real problem in parts of Britain , including my own neighbourhood of East London , where an increasingly vocal islamist faction , encouraged by well meaning but misguided attempts at  'tolerance ' , has succeeded in imposing their own values . And the people really suffering as a result are their british born children , especially the daughters .
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #20 - May 14, 2009, 10:33 PM

    What's the BJP ? Is it another one of those sinister jewish groups ?

    Its a right wing nationalist party in India, that is anti-Muslim.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #21 - May 14, 2009, 10:39 PM

    OK . There were a couple of references to Britain and the BNP , that's what confused me .
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #22 - May 14, 2009, 10:55 PM

    The way you refer to Muslims as a single group of people that impose their ideals on others is simply not true.  It applies to Islamic nations, because they attempt to follow the scriptures.  But to assume each Muslim, migrant or not, will do the same is where I bear issue.  Most of us here were Muslims once upon a time, and few (if any) had the ideals that you seem to think all Muslims have.

    I dont want to dissect your post again, but your language still the same as I would expect from the BJP.  Incidentally are you a supporter?


    I would say ditto regarding the comments drawing comparison to Latino populations as far as assuming it's a single monolithic group of people.  (One thing - they're not all from Mexico, the same way that people say 'Muslim/Arab' as if it's the same thing). 

    Which is to be expected, I guess, from someone who likely has absolutely zero real life experience living and working alongside Latinos. Still, if you've ever had experiences with Latinos of particular persuasions who DO seek to impose their religion, dress codes, and ideas about marriage on others (which is currently happening in New York with State Senator Ruben Diaz), it points to something else. That, like Muslims, Latinos are a diverse people with many different political, social and yes, religious ideas.

    In any case, while similarities can be drawn between the two groups, the way it was used wasn't accurate, in my opinion.  For one thing, you can CHANGE the fact that you are Muslim.  You can't CHANGE the fact that you are Latino.  You are or you aren't. 

    As a personal pet peeve, about 60% of Latinos in the United States are not immigrants - they are born and raised in the United States.  I don't know if the same can be said for the population of Muslims in the United States, especially since there has long been a revolving door of American born converts and it is slowly becoming known how much the organisations there played with demographics numbers in order to make it look like (a) they had more members than they really do and (b) there are more Muslims in the US than there probably really are.

    ETA: A sentence. Sorry - I was watching something, and I know it's hours later.

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #23 - May 15, 2009, 02:52 AM

    The way you refer to Muslims as a single group of people that impose their ideals on others is simply not true.  It applies to Islamic nations, because they attempt to follow the scriptures

    I dont want to dissect your post again, but your language still the same as I would expect from the BJP.  Incidentally are you a supporter?


    Again, I have not said that they're a single group-nor a monolith but these things have happened & do happen.

    I'm not a BJP, nor a BJP supporter-thats' just another peculiar assumption-why are these assumptions labeled at all critiques time & again?-its quite unneccessary & bizarre.

    Have I asked for a harassment, surveillance, deportation? Have I said Muslims are all part of a sinister plot?

    These are the list of accusations labeled at those who dislike, even if that dislike is based on other reasons:

    A critique is a Jew(extremely common, that one!), a Shia, an Ahmadiyya, a Zoroastrian, a Bahai, a Christian, a suspected missionary even if they don't act like one & is simply a non practicing Xtian but prefer Xtianity or other faiths to Islam, a Hindu,a Geert Wilders supporter, a White supremacist, a Zionist, a Pentecostal, a Filipino Catholic, a Thai Buddhist & whatnot. So  many groups have been offended in the first place, btw. Anyway, these baseless queries are as unneccessary as accusing any random person of being a missionary if they do not dislike all faiths but dislike Islam more than others.

    Everyone misrepresents, takes things out of context, wants to drive away all Muslims, should strictly be an ex Muslim etc. If we are not oozing sympathy all the time, we're one of these multiple groups.

    The way you refer to Muslims as a single group of people that impose their ideals on others is simply not true.  It applies to Islamic nations, because they attempt to follow the scriptures.  But to assume each Muslim, migrant or not, will do the same is where I bear issue.  Most of us here were Muslims once upon a time, and few (if any) had the ideals that you seem to think all Muslims have.


    Again, I did not say most will eventually end up doing something like this, but its really unfair that you be enraged at my criticisms of Islam or the bad behavior of migrants, but you can simply dismiss the stuff that happen in Muslim countries with "everyone knows laws are different in Muslim countries," or that, "It applies to Islamic nations, because they attempt to follow the scriptures," I presume quite a few Muslims in Muslim countries, even countries like SA where Emerald hails from have lost their faith & are closet atheists-just like many economic migrants have lost their faiths.Many also might be practicing Muslims with the idea that Islam promotes absolute equality. I did not assume that every liberal Muslim, every practicing Muslim in every nation with discriminatory laws on marriage, apostasy or others holds such views. I understand that no one is a homogenous group, many hold extremely liberal beliefs.

    Yet, if I see such laws-I can't believe that the vast majority in the country  abhors such discriminatory laws which have been imposed on an unwilling populace. Just like you say they attempt to follow their scriptures in Muslim countries & things are different in Muslim countries, its the same with migrants-they're not required to leave their scriptures behind & even if they lack the power to impose it on others, they might regulate their personal lives around it & impose it on their families or on cartoonists through threatening placards etc., again other groups also do this all over the world, but not at all to the same extent.

    I have met Chinese Buddhists in Singapore-been there-who've left Malaysia. One disliked Malaysia for its laws on conversion etc, in Singapore I don't assume Malay Muslims are all that different, except lacking numerical strength. Again, I am not taking all Muslims as a homogenous group with a sinister agenda of global rule-but I don't presume Malay laws were made without the sympathy of the majority of Malays. For a Chinese who's lived there & now lives in Singapore, he has seen such discrimination & he certainly won't dismiss it away as easily as you do.

    As for Latin Americans- again its simply not the same extent in range or scale & its a scurrilous form of moral equivalency to pretend that it is. Again, they aren't a homogenous group-like Muslims aren't, there might well be many of them who think Dan Brown ought to be killed while many Muslims believe that Rushdie is the world's greatest writer & ought to be showered with accolades.

    Not possible to go into the minds of everyone & I certainly would not come up with a statement like Hesperado did that all Muslims deserve mass surveillance & deportation so thats' the way to treat them-I have never said so & will never either say so or support such opinions.

    However, I won't dismiss the statements of the Zoroastrian immigrants from Iran whom I met in London, or the Chinese immigrant taxi driver in Singapore who says & believes that discriminatory laws exist because they have a support of a majority & they dislike such laws.

    Anyway, its exhausting. Exhausting to only be able to criticise Islam with kid gloves on, to not feel angry if surveys show that a vast majority feel that a dastardly terrorist attack was a sinister plot of the country's Government & to be required to say many sweet words about such people, to always dismiss self proclaimed Islamist jihadis as simply gunmen, to be required to criticise not only all faiths but to devote equal  attention to  criticisms of all faiths, to constantly tread on eggshells when one is criticising even if that criticism is based on legitimate reasons & be accused of being a missionary or a right wing supporter if one says that the discriminatory laws of Islamic nations reflects the will of the majority of Muslims in those nations-even if it doesn't reflect everyone's opinions.


    @ Islame & fading,

    There are quite a few people who inflate the numbers of Latin Americans &\or Muslims, who dislike particular languages & so on & I never said that I have any sympathy whatsoever with those kinds.

    But if I am required to dismiss my experiences of the multiple Zoroastrian families from Iran in Britain, or the Chinese Buddhist driver who took us around Singapore on many days as simply not existing or having valid grounds of worries that a majority did reduce their rights in particular countries-I won't dismiss their experiences or views as untrue or irrelevant or my ignorance of the subject.

    Again, respect has to be earned, it cannot be demanded with little to show for it. This isn't a statement in support of deportation of Malay Muslims from Singapore, or attacks on them, or attempts to punish them with similar laws-just that for a person who has two such experiences might well dislike the double standards. Again, its not saying that all Malay Muslims are a homogenous group, they're not, many might be closet apostates, many might be devout in personal life but believing in absolute equality just like many Iranians from where I know the Zoroastrians fled to London might have believed in absolute equality. In fact, those Zoroastrians had kept repeating that not all Iranians were wicked & wrong, she's met many nice ones, but many who also believed that every woman on their streets must be covered. The Chinese driver seemed in his mid thirties, he must have met nice folks as well.

    If the very friendly Chinese driver had remarked in his accented English, with more than a little irritation that out here any Malay Muslim can preach Islam & can marry or convert whoever they like because here most folks are Chinese, but out in Malaysia if we had to marry a Muslim we had to become Muslim because there are more Malay Muslims there & ended his sentence with , "Thats' bad on us, discriminations, wrong!"-I did & do think that he has a legitimate grievance.


    I also won't accept that laws have nothing to do with the views of the people- nor accept that the wills change immediately when they move to a new location.

    I again am not lumping all Muslims into the same category-thats' an impossibility-not all people can hold the same views in any population, but discriminatory laws were suffered by many in Islamic countries because such views were held by many Muslims.

    I guess its time for me not to post anymore or apply vigorous self censorship, perhaps its possible to nag Sparky about his views but not apply criticisms about largescale discrimination in Islamic nations or opine that such  discriminations exist due to the attempt of Muslims to follow their Scriptures-because it will simply be misconstrued as attacks on individual families or individuals or being a member of one of the many anti Islamic associations or people worldwide.

    Many folks have left & again I apologise profusely to speaklow, for similar reasons.

    Its either that we tread on eggshells or we  lipsrsealed, if we have even met folks from Muslim countries who legitimately feel Islam was discriminatory, we either have no clue what we're talking about as we never ventured out of our houses.

    Again, wishing you all the very best! Afro





    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #24 - May 15, 2009, 03:13 AM

    Rashna

    I didn't say you dislike Latinos.  Read again. I said you made a poor comparison.  We can't all be perfect.  I have to be honest, I think you are trying too hard to justify yourself, and I wonder why you're bothering.  It's a message board. 

    However, it seems like anyone who disagrees with you in any way is somehow an apologist for the Islamofascists or blind to realities or hates Zoroastrians or something.  Maybe you need to step back a bit. I criticised your comparison of Muslims - a faith that one follows, albeit not always by choice - to Latinos - an ethnic group that one does not choose to follow - and your post comes back with all this bit about how you have to  keep the kid gloves on when criticising Muslims. 

    I frankly cannot see when you have ever seemed to feel constrained in pouring out your vitriol towards Islam, Mo-meister, and yes, even Muslims themselves.  Which I think you should be free to do -  you've started some good topics - and anyone else can be free to ignore without it becoming an issue.  And if people bring up criticisms, consider if they may be valid. 

    I think that when it comes to the Islamo-reality movement - or whatever we call this business of pointing out the realities of Islam to Muslims and non Muslims a like - there is a lot to be said for some of our mannerisms, the language we use, the people we are sometimes allied with, and so on.  You obviously have contributions to make but if someone points out that you might be going a little too far, maybe it is worth reconsidering the words you are using. 

    As for inflating the number of Latinos in the US, I did not touch on this either.  I touched on the myth that a majority of them are immigrants, wondering if it was an apt comparison, since it would seem more Muslims are immigrants than previously believed vs. the majority of Latinos being, well, American born. 

    From what I remember you say you are 14 years old.  Perhaps you need to consider that as an eighth or ninth grader, you make errors and don't know everything, and I say that as someone who wishes that had been made clear to her when she was your age. 

    [this space for rent]
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #25 - May 15, 2009, 03:39 AM

    Short version: it's a bit much to start claiming persecution (like Muslims love to Tongue ) just because someone tells you that you're not perfect. Take a deep breath and go smell the flowers. They most likely have not been booby-trapped by jihadis.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #26 - May 15, 2009, 10:44 AM

    What's the BJP ? Is it another one of those sinister jewish groups ?

    What exactly is "a sinister Jewish group?"

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #27 - May 15, 2009, 01:00 PM

    Rashna, what exactly is your point.

    Your post was big. It was an interesting read, but I fail to see what are you getting it.

    Can you say it in a nutshell.

    By the way, I think you are great.

    You have your views and beliefs; and though I may not agree with everything, I still respect you for being an honest lady.


    truthful person never fears debates: http://omrow.blogspot.com/
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #28 - May 15, 2009, 01:03 PM

    Rashna, what exactly is your point.

    Your post was big. It was an interesting read, but I fail to see what are you getting it.

    Can you say it in a nutshell.

    By the way, I think you are great.

    You have your views and beliefs; and though I may not agree with everything, I still respect you for being an honest lady.


    You've gone up in my estimation (it was very low to begin with) after saying that.

    So what filling do you like in your pancakes?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Some Honest Opinions:
     Reply #29 - May 15, 2009, 07:35 PM

    I've just read most of the original post and some of the replies...

    What is this thread about? Is it a continuation of a previous thread or something?

    The unlived life is not worth examining.
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »