Re: Maryam Namazie deconversion
Reply #3 - August 21, 2009, 10:53 PM
Here it is:
Losing my religion, 04 February 2008.
First published at New Statesman Faith Column
I find it slightly odd writing for a faith blog, when I don't have any. It's like writing for an Automobile Association blog when I take the bus.
But I do understand why it is so. In this day and age everything is framed within the context of ?faith', especially for those of us deemed to be Muslims - no matter how clearly and loudly we profess and live otherwise. I think this is in large part due to the existence of a political Islamic movement, which strives to gain legitimacy for its terror and misogyny by claiming to represent vast number of people under the label of Muslims.
In a sense, labelling people with innumerable characteristics as Muslim and Muslim alone is part of the process of constraining them in order to feign ?representation'. This labelling in the media, government, and mainstream society is a further capitulation, which effectively hands over millions of people - despite their never ending resistance - to this movement.
I know that the organised religion industry is on the rise everywhere and religious labelling of entire populations is becoming the norm, but with political Islam having state power in many places, and vying for power in others, it makes it a very different phenomenon. The label of Christian today is unlike the same label during the inquisition and crusades.
Correspondingly, I have only become more visible after calling myself an ex-Muslim with the establishment of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain in June 2007. Ironically, even once one has left Islam and renounced religion, one can only be visible by mentioning their former affiliation to it.
It is a huge contradiction and one which I am often asked about. Why call myself an ex-Muslim if I am an atheist? Why renounce religion publicly if I believe religion or its lack thereof must be a private affair and strictly separated from the state and educational system? Why label myself on their terms if I desire a society without labels other than human and citizen?
It is because being an ex-Muslim, or an apostate, is punishable by death in countries ruled by Islamic law; even in a place like Britain people will be surprised at the threats and intimidations those who want to leave face. Which is what makes this public renunciation crucial. It is similar to gays who came out of the closet to highlight the situation and make it easier for others to do so.
Yes, your religion or lack thereof is your business but not when you are killed for it. Then a public challenge becomes a form of resistance.
Oh yes, and why have I renounced Islam and religion? Well, I suppose if you live in a society where you can claim to be of a certain religion, choosing the bits you like, ignoring most of the rest, and just getting on with your life without it having much relevance or impact, then there may never be a need to call yourself a lapsed Christian for example.
But when the state sends a religious official to your school to ensure that you don't mix with your friends who are boys, stops you from swimming, forces you to be veiled, hangs girls on street corners for crimes against chastity, prescribes different books for you and your girlfriends to those read by boys, and drags your loved ones away for corruption, immorality or blasphemy - you have no choice but to look at and confront it. Religion in power is very different to one that has been tamed by an enlightenment.
And why renounce all religion and not just Islam? Because in my opinion, another religion may seem better right now to some people, but it's only because it has been reigned in.
New Statesman Faith Column [external link]
Topic: Maryam Namazie deconversion