Realistically & in practice he will be forced to go through all those things .First there are child support laws which he will have to comply with. He might have to sacrifice his career and happiness to take care of a child. If the woman agrees that he doesn't have to take care of the child, he will live with the knowledge that he has a baby whom he has abandoned and when the child grows up he would likely hate his father. This is a very tough feeling for a man and very much a forced one. With the knowledge of a child with your DNA growing up, its pretty much imposssible not to feel guilty if you abandon him for the sake of your career & personal happiness.
That is not a tenable argument for forced abortions. Its an appeal to consequences which is a logical fallacy.
The sword which is hanging over the man's head is that the moment the woman gets pregnant, all his rights go out the door and it will be the woman who decides what to do, he has little to no say whatsoever. Whereas if the woman does get pregnant she has all the rights to get it aborted if she's not ready for it. Hence the sword hanging over the men's head inflicts a much deeper wound (which will last a lifetime) compared to the sword over the woman's head which would only last the 1 hour it takes to get the kid aborted.
That's as inevitable as Venus Williams not being able to win the Men's Final at Wimbledon, because is growing inside her body and not his. Plus, the potential side effects of an abortion can last a lifetime, especially if the abortion is forced.
Its the man's wallet from which everything from the labor surgery for the kid, to his diapers, to his education, and so on will be paid for the kid growing up inside the woman's uterus. And if he doesn't do that, its the man's body organs which will pay the price of the anxiety and constant guilt it would bring. How can you suggest that its not his decision & he has no rights in terms of this? The baby growing up inside her uterus does not give her the right to fuck up a man's life however she chooses to.
Again, not a tenable argument for forced abortions. Possibly an argument for changing the laws on child support, but not an argument to force women to undergo something against her will which will have potentially lifelong psychological and/or physical effects on her.
Men have more child support laws in regular countries. And women don't have to abandon their children if they don't want them, they can get an abortion anytime they choose to, whereas if she gets pregnant, the man has no rights to say if he doesn't want the child.
That's because human biology dictates that he can't be given the legal right to have the final say without legalising a truly obnoxious violation of women's rights to her own bodily integrity.
The abortion is not a biological issue, its a social issue, because the child will be equally the man's as the woman's, and the consequences for having/not having an abortion are a lot compared to the consequences of not being able to beat men at football. Like I said above, having the baby in your uterus does not give a woman the right to fuck up a man's life.
Abortion is a biological issue because the pregnancy is carried solely by the woman, and you are still missing the point of the comparison. As for fucking up a man's life, its no more fucked up by an unwanted pregnancy than hers is likely to be, and considerably less fucked up than hers would be if she was forced to abort against her will.
Poll
Topic: Men's right to abortions