Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 12:20 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 15, 2024, 06:36 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 13, 2024, 05:18 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 04, 2024, 03:51 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

New Britain
October 30, 2024, 08:34 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
October 22, 2024, 09:05 PM

Tariq Ramadan Accused of ...
September 11, 2024, 01:37 PM

France Muslims were in d...
September 05, 2024, 03:21 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon

 (Read 38762 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 7 8 9« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #240 - January 27, 2010, 12:36 PM

    Take care Abu Yunus!
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #241 - January 27, 2010, 01:01 PM

    This lab work of yours, its very convenient isnt it?  Allows you just enough time to answer the questions you want to Wink

    You came across initially to me as a fair & rational person. I just couldnt understand how how you managed to be stuck with cognitive dissonance for so long.  Thanks, now I know how.

    Here are the outstanding questions that I hope you will answer this weekend when hopefully you have more time.. If you dont know the answer yet, just answer with "according to my position this makes no sense yet" - I thinks that fair, no?

    Quote from: Islame
    a) what more you could reasonably expect from this theory before you are willing to accept it
    b) you have critiqued my stance, so how do you think we evolved? 
    c) Do you doubt the whole of evolution?  If not which parts of evolution do you accept and which animals/organisms are affected
    d) what do you know that 99% of the specialists in the scientific community dont (leaving aside the theists who have a vested non-scientific approach to all of this)
    e) I accept faith is just faith.  I am not asking you to make a scientific assessment of your faith.  I am asking you to make one based on the scientific method & free enquiry. 
    Now if you were to investigate using there 2 critieria alone given the knowledge you currently have in-hand, then do you accept your findings at the very least would be inconclusive i.e. agnostic?

     

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #242 - January 27, 2010, 01:22 PM

    LOL Islame, relentless Cheesy
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #243 - January 27, 2010, 01:27 PM

    yeah dude, stop stalking me  Cheesy

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #244 - January 27, 2010, 01:30 PM

    Hey, its not me who's relentlessly avoiding them

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #245 - January 27, 2010, 01:34 PM

    Its for your own good Abu Yunus Smiley Taste of the bitter medicine Wink
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #246 - January 27, 2010, 01:41 PM

    If I answer your questions at the weekend would you promise to stop stalking me?  Wink

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #247 - January 27, 2010, 01:42 PM

    ok, we can be friends again after you answer them Wink

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #248 - January 27, 2010, 01:43 PM

    ''ok, we can be friends again after you answer them''

     dance

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #249 - January 30, 2010, 04:41 PM

    Hi Islame,

    a)   As I mentioned in my initial post regarding evolution, my main concern with the theory is that it does not explain how exactly the complex cellular pathways that regulate various critical processes are built. The most basic examples include cellular differentiation, DNA repair, DNA replication, mitosis, cytokinesis, gene expression, organelle formation, cellular sexual reproduction pathways - indeed the list goes on and on.

    In one of your earlier posts you responded by saying that natural selection can explain everything. I hope you can realize that this is akin to me asking 'how exactly does a computer work'? and you then replying 'by electricity'. Natural selection is of course great at demonstrating how existing differing genetic traits are preferentially propagated due to that trait offering a survival advantage (the different colored moths on trees is a beautiful example). We also see evolutionary processes taking place in nature i.e. such as bacteria and viruses gaining resistance to antibiotics and vaccinations. But again these changes, and the E.coli nitrate experiment you like so much, all rely on subtle changes to cellular pathways that already exist.

    I have spent almost every day for the last 8 years immersed in cellular biology research and therefore the actual mechanisms of how these wonderfully intricate cellular pathways are built weighs heavy on my mind. In my view, one beneficial mutation at a time would just be utterly ineffective at building these pathways no matter how many billions or even trillions of years are available. Indeed the cellular complexity of most critical pathways would require several simultaneous mutations to occur at the same time for each of the pathways for that pathway to work and be meaningful - this would make evolution, in its current form, a mathematically untenable explanation of how these cellular pathways are built.

    Therefore to answer your question - the theory of evolution needs to explain the nuts and bolts of how it actually works and not just provide a vague description of how it might work. If the theory can come up with a way of exactly describing how individual complex cellular pathways were built, step by step and mutation by mutation, then I would accept the theory. In fact I would become a staunch preacher of the theory. Please note that these are sincere scientific concerns of mine. These concerns underlie the nuts and bolts of how evolution works i.e. at the cellular level. Currently I feel the theory is not capable by quite a long distance at explaining the complexity of most cellular pathways and until this changes I will always have reservations about the theory.

    b)   I'm not sure there is any other credible scientific theory of how we might have evolved

    c)   Since my concerns are about the underlying basic mechanisms of how the theory says we evolve, my concerns are regarding the theory as a whole.

    d)   As I stated earlier I am not stupid enough to think I am smarter than the rest of my peers and mentors and I do not know anything more than they know. Nonetheless neither me nor my peers have given an explanation of how exactly complex cellular pathways are built by evolution. Currently we are limited to responding with very vague responses such as 'by natural selection over millions and millions of years'. This is not satisfactory to me since we are not explaining the nuts and bolts of how the various cellular pathways we know about are actually built. As a theist I have the luxury of being critical of the theory but if we're being honest if you are a non-theist you have no choice but to accept the theory - and I therefore understand why most of them think the theory is a fact without feeling the need to try and explain some vital aspects of how the theory actually works in practice.

    One of the comments you made in your previous post is the following:

    ''Perhaps you should try to convince your own ignorant professor first, before trying with us?''

    The last thing I would accuse my professors of is ignorance, and I certainly wouldn't think anyone was ignorant just because they have different views to me. I am not trying to convince anyone of anything here - but since I have come on here I have been repeatedly asked about my views on evolution - I am simply responding to those queries.

    e)   I agree that if tried to prove the existence of God or Islam based on scientific method and free enquiry then my findings would be inconclusive. Indeed I have always argued that you can not prove/disprove the existence of God by these two criteria. Does this make me an agnostic? Of course it doesn't. Most theists know that they can not prove the existence of God but it's just something they have faith in - this faith is non-scientific. Indeed theists are not generally not referred to as 'knowers' in their relative scriptures but are instead referred to as 'believers' perhaps indicating we are required to have faith without undeniable proof.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #250 - January 30, 2010, 05:12 PM

    blackdoggy,

    You have repeatedly questioned the translation of the word 'samawat'. The most common translation of the word samawat is 'heavens'. In arabic quite often words can have different meanings depending on the context in which it is used. For example even in the English language the word 'heavens' can refer to the sky (the heavens open and it rains) or astronomers sometimes use the same word word to refer to the cosmos. 'Samawat' is quite similar - quite often it is used to refer to the sky but it can also be used to refer to the cosmos. Indeed in his scientific miracles video (see point 10), even Hassan argues for it referring the cosmos in the following verse:

    ''We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars''

    37:6

    Indeed the Quran talks about the sun, moon and stars all being located in the samawat/heavens. It was common knowledge even at that time that the sun, moon and stars were all located in the cosmos and not the sky - indeed a few people have even argued that Muhammad was plagiarising the precorpernican model (an accustaion I showed to be false in my blog).

    Therefore the use of cosmos for samawat is not very disputable. Of course in the days of the Prophet it was not known how vast the cosmos actually was, but this does not mean that the word samawat/heavens can not mean 'universe'.

    Finally, verses that refer to lights and lamps etc. in the heavens being 'guards' for evils spririts and devils may well be metaphorical since they are referring to supernatural beings.


    love, groovy light and all that Tailor stuff

    Abu Yunus



    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #251 - January 30, 2010, 05:48 PM

    I have spent almost every day for the last 8 years immersed in cellular biology research and therefore the actual mechanisms of how these wonderfully intricate cellular pathways are built weighs heavy on my mind. In my view, one beneficial mutation at a time would just be utterly ineffective at building these pathways no matter how many billions or even trillions of years are available. Indeed the cellular complexity of most critical pathways would require several simultaneous mutations to occur at the same time for each of the pathways for that pathway to work and be meaningful - this would make evolution, in its current form, a mathematically untenable explanation of how these cellular pathways are built

    A bit of ducking & diving, but fair enough - at least you realise you faith cannot be explained scientific logic or rationale, thats good enough for me.  

    At least it means you can empathise with our position rather than pointing fingers at the incredulity of our lack of faith & revelling at the thought of us burning in hell as a just reward.  I hope you recognise the bravado of some members here, who despite huge pressures, have had the courage of their convictions rather than remaining hypocrites for the rest of their lives.  I do, but as a theist you might not see it that way.

    I have a number of arguments & questions as you might have figured, but given the difficulty in extracting this response, I will gladly back out.

    In short, keep an open mind, thats all I can ask and I hope you enjoy your remaining stay here

    Respect

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #252 - January 30, 2010, 05:54 PM


    love, groovy light and all that Tailor stuff


     Cheesy On a secondary note, as a muslim what is your view on Tailors interpretation of Islam?  As far as I know he doesnt accept a lot of things that are haram e.g. drinking alcohol & his metaphorical brush is much larger than yours i.e. if we accept that some of the hadith are fabricated, whats wrong with just seeing the whole of the quran as a metaphorical book?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #253 - January 30, 2010, 06:13 PM

    Islame,

    Out of all the concepts regarding religion and all the questions I get asked, the concept of hell, by quite a massive distance, weighs the heaviest on my mind. I do not beleive all atheists will go to hell and indeed question whether hell is eternal based on certain verses of the Quran (please see the 'hell, eternity and reason' section of my blog). At the same time I realise that the logic we humans posess may well be and is actually very likely to be flawed, and that we can not possibly assume to know God's reasons for his actions and indeed what the nature of the afterlife actually will be like. I admit that my faith relies on acknowledging this lack of understanding.

    Peace and all the best
    Abu Yunus

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #254 - January 30, 2010, 06:22 PM

    Cheesy On a secondary note, as a muslim what is your view on Tailors interpretation of Islam?  As far as I know he doesnt accept a lot of things that are haram e.g. drinking alcohol & his metaphorical brush is much larger than yours i.e. if we accept that some of the hadith are fabricated, whats wrong with just seeing the whole of the quran as a metaphorical book?


    The Tailor confuses me as much as he confuses you I'm sure. But I don't think we can consider the Quran as a whole as a metaphorical book - this would make very little sense for a number of reasons. The question regarding hadith I think is different since we are actually contesting the actual validity of the hadith rather than asking if they are metaphorical.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #255 - January 30, 2010, 06:27 PM

    blackdoggy,

    You have repeatedly questioned the translation of the word 'samawat'. The most common translation of the word samawat is 'heavens'. In arabic quite often words can have different meanings depending on the context in which it is used. For example even in the English language the word 'heavens' can refer to the sky (the heavens open and it rains) or astronomers sometimes use the same word word to refer to the cosmos. 'Samawat' is quite similar - quite often it is used to refer to the sky but it can also be used to refer to the cosmos. Indeed in his scientific miracles video (see point 10), even Hassan argues for it referring the cosmos in the following verse:

    ''We have indeed decked the lower heaven with beauty (in) the stars''

    37:6

    Indeed the Quran talks about the sun, moon and stars all being located in the samawat/heavens. It was common knowledge even at that time that the sun, moon and stars were all located in the cosmos and not the sky - indeed a few people have even argued that Muhammad was plagiarising the precorpernican model (an accustaion I showed to be false in my blog).

    Therefore the use of cosmos for samawat is not very disputable. Of course in the days of the Prophet it was not known how vast the cosmos actually was, but this does not mean that the word samawat/heavens can not mean 'universe'.

    Finally, verses that refer to lights and lamps etc. in the heavens being 'guards' for evils spririts and devils may well be metaphorical since they are referring to supernatural beings.


    love, groovy light and all that Tailor stuff

    Abu Yunus





    Abu Yunus out of respect to you I will respond in more detail when I have read your entire blog along with comments. So far I read the first page and all the comments. I loved the debate between you and S?ren Svendsen. I can't say when I have time to read all of your blog, I am currently reading Mohammed's bio at this site http://ali-dashti-23-years.tripod.com/. Along with books on the historicity of Jesus and Coyne's book "Why Evolution is True", a title that must make you cringe Smiley

    There is a huge problem when interpreting the Quran. Arabic was not a very developed language before the Quran. And not a very wide-spread language either. Until the Quran came I don't think there was any scholary work done on the Arabic language itself. Grammer and syntax seem have been formed after it. That means there are a variety of ways to interpret words.

    As far as I know sama means sky. Samawat mean heavens. Before I would agree and say heavens = Universe. Even though heavens is in plural. To translate it correctly, should it not be universes? Wal saaba sawamat wal arz. And the 7 universes and the earth.

    This debate will be extremely frustrating because we will be micro-arguing for ages, around the subjectivity of an interpretation of a word. I honestly want to find the truth. I always have. And I find it frustrating that it is not really that clear, unless you take it on faith. But the Quran, along with Prophets and divine religions, does not make much sense with rationale.

    Meanwhile I have to worry about burning in eternal hell, because a part of me disagrees that sawamat means Universe. It means heavens. It means skies. I don't see how any of this is related to the model of the Universe we have today. I can of course, on faith. I can make myself believe and make myself understand in the manner which makes the Quran true. I don't feel this is an honest approach though. And I find it disrespectful to interpret words in a manner which I disagree with because I am afraid. Especially when Allah describes himself as the Most Merciful.

    I also asked whether you could recommend books on Evolution and you said you hadn't read any books on the subject and they are biased. You also said the same about books espousing Creationism. I ask you, what am I to do? I am not a scientist, it is far too late for me to start anew and enroll in University for a biology degree. How am I supposed to learn about the World? The Universe? Am I to take it on faith that creatures just sprang into existence? That man was made from earth? That the earth was formed along with all the oceans, the atmosphere, the physical laws, mountains, landscapes etc just like that? God created them, end of story. I find that explanation very unenlightening. And it was a mode of thought I accepted before, because I had no choice.

    I ask you again, how am I to learn about the world? I ask you out of sincerity, I need to learn and know how we came about. Religious people will tell me to have faith in religion. Being raised muslim, I will be asked to believe in the Quran, and the Prophet. Being raised Shia, I will be asked to believe in the Imams, and modern-day scholars. All of my questions, the way I live my life, my entire existence need to conform to Islam. Everything from science, to how I live, to how I dress, to art and culture, to how I treat others, all of it needs to conform to one book, one man (and men) that lived 1400 years ago. And the interpretations of these men from men that live today. And I am asked to raise my children, in similar manner, and their children.
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #256 - January 30, 2010, 06:32 PM

    thought provking post BD - makes me wonder why Allah stopped sending prophets so leaving us to culturally relatives his book for him?  Surely it could not be difficult to send prophets in every country, every town, every village, telling people how to correctly live their lives.  Thats the least he would do if he cared about us.

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #257 - January 30, 2010, 08:04 PM

    Hey Blackdog, I appreciate your sincere post.

    Regarding the translation for Sama, I agree we could be micro-arguing for ages without getting anywhere. I actually had an interesting discussion with Ibn Saba when I first came on this forum, his views were as follows:

    ''The term sama' ("heaven" or "sky") is applied to anything that is spread like a canopy above any other thing. Thus, the visible skies which stretch like a vault above the earth and form, as it were, its canopy, are called sama': and this is the primary meaning of this term in the Qur'an; in a wider sense, it has the connotation of "cosmic system". As regards the "seven heavens", it is to be borne in mind that in Arabic usage - and apparently in other Semitic languages as well - the number "seven" is often synonymous with "several" (see Lisan al-Arab), just as "seventy" or "seven hundred" often means "many" or "very many" (Taj al-'Arus). This, taken together with the accepted linguistic definition that "every samu' is a sama' with regard to what is below it" (Raghib), may explain the "seven heavens" as denoting the multiplicity of cosmic systems.''

    Ibn Saba may well be correct and I do not know that my 'universe' interpretation is correct although I do sincerely beleive that it is a possible inferred translation. In addition I discuss in my blog the possibility of multiverse theories and other theories (M-theory) that might explain the existence of several universes  being arranged 'one on top of the other'. Of course none of these things are things I can prove. And you're right - having faith makes this intepretation easier for me to beleive - but this does not necessarily mean I am being dishonest.

    I admire that you want to learn about the world we all inhabit and in fact from my point of veiw Islam does not prevent us from doing so, on the contrary I feel Islam encourages this. We humans somehow quite amazingly have the capability to understand the laws that physical reality is governed by - as a theist I beleive God gave us this intellect for a reason and hoped we would be so inquisitive. Being a Muslim doesn't mean you have to feel like you're imprisoned somehow regarding kowledge. When I told you I couldn't reccomend any books about evolution I wasn't trying to discourage you from reading such books - I was just trying to encourage you to read these particular books with a critical eye. I would encourage you to read any books regarding physics and biology you find interesting given this thirst for understanding you have. Reading physics books is one of my favourite pastimes.

    At present there are certain things science can not explain i.e. where the energy/matter that gave birth to our universe came from, where the beautifal laws that govern the universe came from etc. Even investigating these things is not un-Islamic, although whether we one day might be able to answer these questions is another matter.

    I of course do not personally beleive I am following the veiws of a man who lived 1400 hundered years ago but by following the Quran I am following the God that created the entire universe and everything in it. I am also very inquisitive about how His laws govern our elegant universe so I will continue to learn. I personally beleive that science will not be able to explain everything but then again I am grateful for having the capabilty to learn what is knowable.

    best wishes
    Abu Yunus

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Stories of the Qur'an - Solomon
     Reply #258 - January 30, 2010, 08:32 PM

    Thanks for your post Abu Yunus  Afro
  • Previous page 1 ... 7 8 9« Previous thread | Next thread »