This could be a whole other thread on how these guys, for the most part, are the exact opposite of exploitative.
Before I left this forum for few months, I believe it was Q-Man that posted a very hillarious voice mail left by a Pick Up artist called "DimitriTheLover." I must admit I laughed at what he believed is attraction, but it was disappointing to read the comments of people in that thread just ridiculing every Men who give dating advice to other Men weather it's through books, or seminars or just internet forums. With every form of art, there are going to be a good approach, and a bad approach--in the context of picking up women, that translates to a humanistic approach, and a sly/unethical approach. No doubt "DimitriTheLover" is the sly and manipulative type, but clumping everyone into one category based on one poor example displayed by an insecure man and a biased (and I'd argue Sexist) thesis written by Elan Clift, is not exactly being fair.
As much as I appreciate and support the woman's movement, I also support the recent Man's movement as well (more so actually). Striking a balance is always the best thing over picking one over the other--frankly that's what the thread was lacking, for which I didn't bother to reply. This whole encounter with that lady and her silly comment really reminded of Q's thread instantly.