Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Yesterday at 04:00 PM

New Britain
February 14, 2025, 11:13 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens

 (Read 17444 times)
  • Previous page 1 2 3 4« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #90 - September 01, 2011, 10:50 PM

    So asking a religious dude "What now?" is going to deconvert him?

    Nice.


    like a earlier poster mention the striking remark "god is dead" was not directed at theist but atheists
    until you know 'what know' you cant say shit to the theist. like i said it likes braking down the house and not having any materials to build a new one, you would only find yourself patching up pieces of rubble and creation a abomination of architecture and aesthetics,  living a life that would have been better under the old religions

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #91 - September 01, 2011, 10:53 PM

    So asking a religious dude "What now?" is going to deconvert him?

    Nice.


    your still standing on the porch of the churches arguing with the priest
    you don't even know atheism yet , step out
    and ask yourself what know?

    your like a person telling everyone to wear a dashiki because you have brought one
    the only thing is you haven't even worn it yet
    you've denounced your old cloths as trashy but you still got them on
    so go and put on your dashiki and have a good look in the mirror
    and then you might come up with a idea for a better design which you can then present to the theist

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #92 - September 01, 2011, 10:59 PM

    Jesus Christ! Are you clinically retarded or something?

    You've evaded my question a second time, you made unwarranted assumptions and you went off on a tangent.

    I'll try to make this very simple:

    You said that "real" atheism does not ask theists "Where's the evidence for a god?". SO WHAT THE FUCK DOES IT ASK THEM?! In other words, what is your atheism based on, if not the lack of evidence for a deity?

    There. Simple enough?

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #93 - September 01, 2011, 11:02 PM

    Jesus Christ! Are you clinically retarded or something?


    Lucem Ferre is trolling - brilliantly though, I love the guy. Chill dude...  popcorn
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #94 - September 01, 2011, 11:09 PM

    If he's really trolling, then I definitely got punk'd.

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #95 - September 01, 2011, 11:14 PM


    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #96 - September 01, 2011, 11:15 PM

    ^ stolen from Fombles.

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #97 - September 01, 2011, 11:15 PM

    Jesus Christ! Are you clinically retarded or something?

    You've evaded my question a second time, you made unwarranted assumptions and you went off on a tangent.

    I'll try to make this very simple:

    You said that "real" atheism does not ask theists "Where's the evidence for a god?". SO WHAT THE FUCK DOES IT ASK THEM?! In other words, what is your atheism based on, if not the lack of evidence for a deity?

    There. Simple enough?


    stupid new atheist showmen always jumping on the stage as if its that's simple
    atheism is NOT a belief so it doesn't believe there is no god - atheism render's god IRRELEVANT  
    for a theist god is relevant in/to all things, morality, etc as all these things depend on god
    by taking away god you take away EVERYTHING
    so the question i would ask a theist is
    why is god relevant?
    and the theist would unwind a long index of mans psychology/history/ethics/ideals/development etc and say this is why
    and as a atheist i would have no reply because the theist would be  right
    -unless- i show the theist that the path ahead is a new one atm we are in the dark

    you can ask the theist  'prove god' but then its a stupid question since the theist has long ago declared his 'faith' (another complex concept you morons cant seem to understand). Render god irrelevant and ask yourself what know then the theist would join you willingly withought having to prance around on stage

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #98 - September 01, 2011, 11:18 PM

    Nah, definitely trolling.

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #99 - September 01, 2011, 11:21 PM

    your still standing on the porch of the churches arguing with the priest
    you don't even know atheism yet , step out
    and ask yourself what know?

    your like a person telling everyone to wear a dashiki because you have brought one
    the only thing is you haven't even worn it yet
    you've denounced your old cloths as trashy but you still got them on

    What cloths would these be, exactly?
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #100 - September 01, 2011, 11:22 PM

    but i don't think science will kill of riligoen it would just give it a new form a form far more dangerous because now riligoen will start making claims that impact the real world whereas before riligoen was content to remain a idea in peoples minds.

    I disagree.  I don't think Islamism (for example) is a reaction against new atheism.  Islamism is far older.  And a lot of religious Muslims in the world are not content to just keep their worldview to themselves as a private matter.

    "Many people would sooner die than think; In fact, they do so." -- Bertrand Russell

    Baloney Detection Kit
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #101 - September 01, 2011, 11:27 PM

    What cloths would these be, exactly?



    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #102 - September 01, 2011, 11:31 PM



    ?

    If this is meant to be 'no cloth' then you've just... defeated your own argument.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #103 - September 01, 2011, 11:37 PM

    What cloths would these be, exactly?


    read the original article on page one, i cant be bothered to repeat it a hundred times or just read this pasted copy of a eariliere reposnce

    stupid new atheist showmen always jumping on the stage as if its that's simple
    atheism is NOT a belief so it doesn't believe there is no god - atheism render's god IRRELEVANT 
    for a theist god is relevant in/to all things, morality, etc as all these things depend on god
    by taking away god you take away EVERYTHING
    so the question i would ask a theist is
    why is god relevant?
    and the theist would unwind a long index of mans psychology/history/ethics/ideals/development etc and say this is why
    and as a atheist i would have no reply because the theist would be  right
    -unless- i show the theist that the path ahead is a new one atm we are in the dark


    figure it out


    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #104 - September 01, 2011, 11:41 PM

    http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/12/the_courtiers_reply.php

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #105 - September 01, 2011, 11:41 PM

    Basically people are going to believe crazy shit no matter how wrong they are, so the world is doomed.  

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #106 - September 01, 2011, 11:49 PM

    read the original article on page one, i cant be bothered to repeat it a hundred times or just read this pasted copy of a eariliere reposnce

    Ah I see. You don't actually know what you're meant to be arguing. This is a masturbation session for you, sitting atop your perch, smiling smugly at the thought that hey, not only are you a cut above the infantile religionists, but also the atheists they grow into. And yet, here you are posting other people's words, skirting round questions and doing nought else but excoriating like you're fucking Socrates or something. With the occasional dollop of meretricious modesty, of course.

    Heard it all before, brother. Said it all before, even. Let me know when you have something to say.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #107 - September 02, 2011, 12:08 AM

    If he's really trolling, then I definitely got punk'd.


    Happens to the best of us.

    how fuck works without shit??


    Let's Play Chess!

    harakaat, friend, RIP
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #108 - September 02, 2011, 12:16 AM

    Let me now when you have something to say.


     Cheesy

    how fuck works without shit??


    Let's Play Chess!

    harakaat, friend, RIP
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #109 - September 02, 2011, 12:47 PM

    Ah I see. You don't actually know what you're meant to be arguing. This is a masturbation session for you, sitting atop your perch, smiling smugly at the thought that hey, not only are you a cut above the infantile religionists, but also the atheists they grow into. And yet, here you are posting other people's words, skirting round questions and doing nought else but excoriating like you're fucking Socrates or something. With the occasional dollop of meretricious modesty, of course.

    Heard it all before, brother. Said it all before, even. Let me know when you have something to say.




    damn, that turned me on - me so horny   Nude nerd
        Cheesy

    You where born with a blank slate
    what determines the way you think?
    the ideals you hold? the beliefs you have?
    you did not acquire them in the womb nor did they come from thin air
    you where brought into a society within a region with  cultures. you where introduced to images, sounds ways of moving or talking, language, rules governing concepts  
    and this determines your life long cognizance.
    all those things i mentioned are infected if not progenated or directly conceived from riligoen (by riligoen i mean any form of deity worship so even paganism). Then capitalism came along like a trojan horse and took over, consuming riligoen into the  ovaries of its system.
    so what i am saying is every-single thing is infected by riligoen-capitalism. I just want the smug new atheists to acknowledge this , this means science as well. So everything is a lie - how can you be a atheist without first realizing nihilism, once you realize nihilism you can do something about it,  that is IF you have found a way to free yourself entirely from capitilism-riligoen. Science can only work when there is a filter of space&time, only humans have the conception of space&time it does not belong to the objective world  - there is no Objective 'time'. So what you find in science is there to serve us it does not belong in nature. Its like the cloud that look like a dog, does it look like a dog? its not really in the shape of a dog but to us humans it looks like a dog and we can even prove that it looks like a dog (prove is another word for monkeys acting retarded together), that does not mean that the cloud itself is in the shape of a dog, its just a human conception, we can never know things as they are, take away space&time (which is only in OUR minds) and science shits itself and is no more, your no more, and there is no individuating things, there are no things, just undisciplined matter but you would not even know this as you would also just be matter withought form withought 'i' so matter also wont 'exist'.  

    im approaching the problem from a perspective that places the human as the actor at center stage
    even if you do believe science to be objective you have to ask yourself does science serve  a purpose within-itself,
    would there be a science withought us, are we progressing for the sake of the word "progression" and what does it mean to progress when we have no end goal or purpose ?  dawkins and his kind have forgotten we are HUMAN ALL TO HUMAN

    there is NO OBJECTIVE TRUTH and this is not post-modernism (post modernism is a condition of capitalism) this is existentialism, this is us, this is the human and nothing outside the human can be known and everything within the human is a confusion but the human as the human is the only thing that has any worth within existence.

    that's all i am saying  

    NO OBJECTIVE TRUTH

    THE END [/b]


    btw don't take my  brash manner of speaking  as an offense, i mean nothing by it - all love

     spacecraft

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #110 - September 02, 2011, 01:13 PM

    Rrrrriiiggghht

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #111 - September 02, 2011, 01:16 PM





    -

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #112 - September 02, 2011, 01:30 PM

    Yes! You win the argument by asking this question  Wink


     Cheesy

    peace brother

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #113 - September 03, 2011, 05:10 AM

      The general character of the world, on the other hand, is to all eternity chaos; not by the absence of necessity, but in the sense of the absence of order, structure, form, beauty, wisdom, and whatever else our aesthetic humanities are called.  Judged by our reason, the unlucky casts are far oftenest the rule, the exceptions are not the secret purpose; and the whole musical box repeats eternally its air, which can never be called a melody, and finally the very expression, "unlucky cast" is already an anthropomorphising which involves blame.  But how could we presume to blame or praise the universe!  Let us be on our guard against ascribing to it heartlessness and unreason, or their opposites; it is neither perfect, nor beautiful, nor noble; nor does it seek to be anything of the kind, it does not at all attempt to imitate man!  It is altogether unaffected by our aesthetic and moral judgments!  Neither has it any self- preservative instinct, nor instinct at all; it also knows no law.  Let us be beware of saying that there are laws in nature. There are only necessities: there is no one who commands, no one who obeys, no one who transgresses.  When you know that there is no design, you know also that there is no chance: for it is only where there is a world of design that the word "chance" has a meaning.  Let us beware of saying that death is the opposite of life. The living is only a type of what is dead - and a very rare type.  Let us be on our guard against thinking that the world eternally creates the new.  There are no eternally enduring substances; matter is just another such error as the God of the Eleatics.  But when shall we be at an end with our foresight and precaution!  When will all these shadows of God cease to obscure us?  When shall we have nature entirely undeified!  When shall we be permitted to naturalise our selves by means of the pure, newly discovered, newly redeemed nature?  


    Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science.  Die fröhliche Wissenschaft.



    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #114 - September 03, 2011, 08:20 AM

    Posting in lame ass thread.

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #115 - September 03, 2011, 08:20 AM

    Ah I see. You don't actually know what you're meant to be arguing. This is a masturbation session for you, sitting atop your perch, smiling smugly at the thought that hey, not only are you a cut above the infantile religionists, but also the atheists they grow into. And yet, here you are posting other people's words, skirting round questions and doing nought else but excoriating like you're fucking Socrates or something. With the occasional dollop of meretricious modesty, of course.

    Heard it all before, brother. Said it all before, even. Let me know when you have something to say.


    I love you. You have summarized the entirety of Lucerne Fur's existence in one succinct paragraph.

    Formerly known as Iblis
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #116 - September 03, 2011, 09:18 AM

    What kind of shitty threads are going on these days?

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #117 - September 03, 2011, 11:10 PM

    I love you. You have summarized the entirety of Lucerne Fur's existence in one succinct paragraph.


    lol i have to admit it was fun pissing you guys of, although there are serious concerns this thread is not that serious and i wasn't realty arguing about anything - after all its a internet forum.   

    "A belief in hell and the knowledge that every ambition is doomed to frustration at the hands of a skeleton have never prevented the majority of human beings from behaving as though death were no more than an unfounded rumour."
    Aldous Huxley
  • Re: The poverty of the new atheism by Scott Stephens
     Reply #118 - September 04, 2011, 12:06 AM

    lol i have to admit it was fun pissing you guys of, although there are serious concerns this thread is not that serious and i wasn't realty arguing about anything - after all its a internet forum.   


    A place where actual substantive debate and discussion can be had. You should try it sometime.  Wink

    how fuck works without shit??


    Let's Play Chess!

    harakaat, friend, RIP
  • Previous page 1 2 3 4« Previous thread | Next thread »