boy.. devilsadvokat, I am tired., well that is life., so let me try again
fair enough,you believe he hated jews lol -
Yes He loved them so much, All Jewish males of Saudi Arabia of that time were dismembered by him and heroes of Islam following him .,
And and the Jewish females were used thoroughly by Prophet and his followers .. LOVE IS EVERYWHERE Flowing from loins ..Cytus interruptus., Azl.. Azl... Praise be to Allaah. read more
With regard to ‘azl (coitus interruptus), or withdrawing during intercourse, the correct scholarly view is that there is nothing wrong with it, because of the hadeeth of Jaabir (may Allaah be pleased with him): “We used to practice ‘azl at the time when the Qur’aan was being revealed” – i.e., at the time of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). If that action had been haraam, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) would have forbidden it. But the scholars say that one should not engage in ‘azl with a free woman except with her permission, because she has the right to have children. Moreover, withdrawing without her permission diminishes her pleasure, because the woman’s pleasure can only be completed after ejaculation. So not asking her permission causes her to lose out on pleasure and on the possibility of having children. Hence we state the condition that this may only be done with her permission.
Thirdly: the reason why the Sahaabah engaged in ‘azl was because they did not want the woman – especially a slave woman – to get pregnant, so that they could continue to enjoy a physical relationship with them and the woman would still be able to do their work. Abu Dawood narrated that a man said, “O Messenger of Allaah, I have a slave woman and I engage in ‘azl with her, because I do not want her to get pregnant, but I want what men want. But the Jews say that ‘azl is a lesser form of infanticide.” He said, “The Jews are lying. If Allaah wants to create (a child) you cannot prevent that.”
but in medieval islamic society and up until recently muslim/jewish relations were comparatively peaceful compared to christian/jewish relations.
what all you have there is "Butt" but no meat ...no text and no proof..
Until jewish occupation and annexation of palestinian land and the failure of nationalism and the rise of hamas (aided by the Israeli-right) hence the hate -filled three year old girl etc.
yes where did the Palestinians come from?? From bible??
Basically you are making my case for me, by highlighting verses in the Quran and extrapolating it 1400 years to be the prism in which to view palestinian hate of jews, rather than studying the intervening 1400 years especially in comparison to Christainity (I mean is christianity institutionally anti-semetic , is judaism institutionally anti- not the chosen people), if indeed there was hatred on that scale it is a wonder jewish communities fared better under islamic rule than christian rule.
Well I am not looking through prism, I am not dispersing the light, I am looking through Lens with very tight focus .. I don't think you have read any history, forget Islamic history devilsadvokat,., Yes you must read .. all 1400 years of history., would you like to have books/references on that?
Topic: Is Islam Institutionally Anti-Semetic?