Re: Cristina Rad (zomgitscriss) speech on Islam at AAC
Reply #25 - March 07, 2012, 06:27 PM
Actually it's not just, someone uses a hard speech once, twice, or occasionally, is that this speech is used obsessively, by the neo-atheists.
Is that this speech, aims to present all religious people ( Christians in general, atheist will avoid criticizing Judaism, because they do not like to be accused of "anti-Semitism", and avoid attacking Muslim, because they do not like to be accused of "racism") as stupid people, retarded, dumb, while atheists are present as rationalist.
I heard some atheists kids on yt, and in videoconferencing saying that atheists are call "rationalist" or "scientists".
It's the systematic implementation, of the idea, that you can not trust a man who holds a religious belief, that such a man is dangerous, and in their blogs, post, videos, the religious man, will be automatically associated with a "Muslim terrorist" or whit some Pentecostal fanatic.
Furthermore, atheist have a whole obsession, that if "religious people win" the end of the world will come, and that we should do something quickly.
They imagine that they are soldiers in a war, and that this war will decide the fate of humanity.
But let's do not forget how all the atheist experiments failed, starting whit the French Revolution, Paris Commune, the Mexico atheist regime post 1917 constitution ap to the Cristero War, the Cultural Revolution in China, the League of militant atheist from U.R.S.S., the atheist regime in Albania.
Each time the same story that we should do something quickly, we should do something quickly and not let these religious people "win".
The atheist speech aims to generate a whole phobia, against any religious man. We should not forget that the two
totalitarian regimes of the last century started whit some funny caricatures that presented "obsessively", Jews in Germany, and landowners and priests in Russia, in a certain way.
It's the same obsession, to attack an entire group, for what, some have made.
The "rational" thing to do, would be to try to explain and to gain allies from various religious denominations, and
together to find answers, against fanaticism. But what atheists trying to is to create a gap, with them on one side as "rationalists" and everyone else on the other side as "retarded".
I want to live for immortality, and I will accept no compromise. from F.Dostoyevsky
Le XXI?me si?cle sera spirituel ou ne sera pas - Andr? Malraux
Eu cand discut cu un ateu e ca si cum as discuta cu usa - Petre Tutea
Topic: Cristina Rad (zomgitscriss) speech on Islam at AAC