
A) Says who?
Chairman, erm, Chairperson Q, exalted and glorious leader of our cherished revolution.
B) Taking power first and foremost means taking power over one's own body and making choices that feel good to ME. For those who want to be hairless, that's their prerogative. For those who like having their natural hair, that's their prerogative.
If anything that's feminism (and just generally a good rule for men AND women).
Whatever, Chairperson Q is gonna ban a lot of shit he doesn't care for-- body hair, guys wearing open toed footwear, long hair on guys, hippies, bad music, raves, Justin Bieber (not just his music but
him), Tom Cruise and any woman he's ever dated, unflavored mayonnaise, Subway sandwich shops, etc.
C) Equality means if women have to twist into pretzels every morning to shave to appear like prepubescent girls, then so should men have to. Otherwise neither should have to.
I really don't like this argument, and I've heard it a few times before. Throughout most of my life I've been attracted to women my own age or older so this idea that men like women shaved cause that reminds them of little girls is bullshit I think. I just don't care for body hair is all. I don't like looking at hairy men either, so I'm certainly not gonna like it on someone of the opposite sex. Where is the aesthetic appreciation angle here? Why is it all about sexism and/or caving to social pressure? Can't someone just like the hairless look? You may have noticed lots of men wax their chests and I trim the hair on my ballsack-- just looks nicer to me. Again, although I'm not a fan of body hair in general, pits aren't such a big deal, but I do like shaven legs on a woman-- sue me.