Not in Europe it's not.
We don't watch Ann Coulter and Fox News in Europe, Mr.Coherent-Argument, hence THE VERY FIRST SENTENCE IN MY LAST REPLY.
Again, I don't actually believe Dawkins or Snitchens are racists, was just making a point that publicly supporting a Black woman doesn't automatically clear one from the charge of racism-- a point you seemed to have missed.
And you seem to have missed the simple rule, that you should read, before replying. Again, for your "I bumped my head against a pyramid too many times"- Egyptian ass: Dawkins and Hitchens support AN EX-MUSLIM WOMAN for being an EX-MUSLIM WOMAN, not for being "an African who can read and write and actually behaves like us real human beings!", as you want to imply.
Your incoherent nonsense about America, immigration policy and linking it to Wilders (yeah, sure, because I bet Wilders has a problem with brain surgeons who happen to come from a Muslim background and not with the criminals on welfare in Holland, smfh (attn: that was ironic sarcasm).
Which, for the THIRD TIME, wasn't the case, is not the case and will not be the case, even though you are clearly just prejudiced against Hitchens and Dawkins and want to HINT at the possibility that it COULD be the case, without "actually claiming it". Nice one, but don't play that game with me.
I never have. I'm quite familiar with the history of the Civil Rights struggle and the sanitized portraits of King that emerged from it. Also the differences between King and Jackson who was referred to by King once as "Uncle Tom Jesse"
So WTF do you bring up MLK in the context of Jesse Jackson? That's like me bringing up Himmler in the context of Goethe. Both happen to be Germans, just like both MLK and JJ happen to be both African-Americans. Other than that.........(again, smh @ your "logic")
Middle-class indeed. Do you even know what that term means? His father was a naval officer, hardly a working-class role, especially at that time when officers in the Royal Navy tended to come almost exclusively from the middle and upper classes.
Yes, I know what that means, you ignoramus. Being NEITHER A NAVAL OFFICER NOR BEING MIDDLE-CLASS means "coming from money", as you have suggested, you moron. Again, ignoramus, being part of the middle-class doesn't mean "coming from money", especially at that time.
:Kiss my hairy Egyptian-American ass, fuckface. That un-passive-aggressive enough for ya, ya little shit?
First off, I am not little (is 6'5" little, or do you consider it little, just as working for the navy means "coming from money" to you, Niles Moron? Can I call you that Nile(s) Moron? Seems so fitting). And why would you ask me to perform semi-homosexual actions on you, while insulting me? Is that your thing? I mean, that whole homo-erotic, SM stuff? Sorry, not my thing.
Yes, I'm aware of ALL of this shit. My point was that one could construct an argument for Snitchens being objectively racist, not that the argument would be a good one, but it's certainly not beyond the realm of reason as you seemed to suggest. But once again you missed the fuckin point and decided instead to go off on some half-baked rant full of insults against me. Well fuck you too buddy.
Off course you'd be aware of that, as a know-it-all! Excuse me, I have forgotten who I'm dealing with.
You had absolutely no point. Your "point" was that you hate Hitchens and needed some fuel to "rationalize" the hate for him ("coming from money" still makes me giggle, considering, one of my friends is a 100+ million trust-fund baby who's grandpa is a real-estate mogul and my grandpa was an officer in the Navy LMAO).
And again, Niles Moron, we could use your "tried & true" pseudo-"reasoning" to make an analogous argument to support the hypothesis, that Usama ben Ladin was actually an investor in the American military complex, who basically did all that "terror"-thingy as some sort of equivalent to "insider trading". But we would be stupid to do that, right Niles?
Still your pal,
Mr.Hanky
Topic: Dawkins upsets Muslims again (Scientific achievement)