Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Yesterday at 12:41 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 08:35 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
July 05, 2024, 10:43 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
July 03, 2024, 05:35 PM

Gaza assault
by zeca
June 30, 2024, 10:43 PM

France Muslims were in d...
June 30, 2024, 08:06 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
June 26, 2024, 11:07 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
June 26, 2024, 03:53 AM

Eid Al-Adha
by akay
June 26, 2024, 03:50 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
June 24, 2024, 02:38 PM

ماذا يحدث هذه الايام؟؟؟.
by akay
June 17, 2024, 01:00 PM

Jesus mythicism
by zeca
June 15, 2024, 10:14 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam

 (Read 36304 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 ... 11 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #30 - October 13, 2014, 05:09 PM

    that is your opinon anyway you say he was limited to his time means all what he did was limited to rules existed on his time therefore you can't say he was a pedophile because it was OK at his time to marry at young age the fact that Aisha aws engaged to jabir Ibn muti'm before the prophet and the fact that non of his enemies said anything nagitive about his marriage proves that you might say Muslims want to implimint everything he did which is again impossible show me an orphan who had no house no parents no one to take care of him except only few people and was poor to start a major movement from out of nowhere anyway for the slave part i want your thoughts on this:

    Abu Mas'ud al-Ansari reported:
    When I was beating my servant, I heard a voice behind me (saying): Abu Mas'ud, bear in mind Allah has more dominance over you than you have upon him. I turned and (found him) to be Allah's Messenger (ﷺ). I said: Allah's Messenger, I set him free for the sake of Allah. Thereupon he said: Had you not done that, (the gates of) Hell would have opened for you, or the fire would have burnt you.
    وَحَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ، مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْعَلاَءِ حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا الأَعْمَشُ، عَنْ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، التَّيْمِيِّ عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي مَسْعُودٍ الأَنْصَارِيِّ، قَالَ كُنْتُ أَضْرِبُ غُلاَمًا لِي فَسَمِعْتُ مِنْ خَلْفِي صَوْتًا ‏"‏ اعْلَمْ أَبَا مَسْعُودٍ لَلَّهُ أَقْدَرُ عَلَيْكَ مِنْكَ عَلَيْهِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَالْتَفَتُّ فَإِذَا هُوَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ هُوَ حُرٌّ لِوَجْهِ اللَّهِ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ أَمَا لَوْ لَمْ تَفْعَلْ لَلَفَحَتْكَ النَّارُ أَوْ لَمَسَّتْكَ النَّارُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏
    Reference    : Sahih Muslim 1659 c
    In-book reference    : Book 27, Hadith 56
    USC-MSA web (English) reference    : Book 15, Hadith 4088



    That's his point though, if his actions were limited to his time even if good for his time, why then view him as a prophet? Why not take him as an influential man that did some good and some bad in his time?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #31 - October 13, 2014, 05:12 PM

    Quote from: Sahih Muslim, Book 10, Hadith 3901
    Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported: There came a slave and pledg- ed allegiance to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) on migration; he (the Holy Prophet) did not know that he was a slave. Then there came his master and demanded him back, whereupon Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves, and he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave (or a free man)  


    How does this fall into shaping the 'slaves were permitted because they were poor' hypothesis?

    أشهد أن لا إله
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #32 - October 13, 2014, 05:13 PM

    I'm fairly sure that Islam was fairly socialist with the sadaka, zaka, bait mal el muslemeen(I think is what it's called). Not only did poor people not have it that bad due to those things, but I'm fairly certain that slaves had no right to benefit of such things, as they weren't recognized as individual people by the 'state'.

    To add to zeca's point if he doesn't mind:

    EDIT: Also, to my knowledge, slaves did NOT have any foretold right for money. Their 'owners' just had to make sure they ate and drank and had some clothes.



    so the problem you have here is why muhammad killed her father and his men I'm I correct?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #33 - October 13, 2014, 05:16 PM

    that is your opinon


    its the truth, not an opinion.

    All of this should lead you to conclude that Islam was constructed by men, limited by the time it was created in.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #34 - October 13, 2014, 05:18 PM

    1-they did they were slave muslims and non muslim slaves

    Last time I checked, it was not permissible to enslave Muslims that were born free. This is a problem for your hypothesis.

    2-when you capture them how do you keep them even now when you go to war in another country and you capture enemy soldiers and put them in prisons they are basically captives not slaves

    So is Islamic slavery about helping the poor or not? Clearly not. Another problem for your hypothesis.

    3-irrelevant to my point i was speaking of why Islam allowed slavery nothing about women here and rape is a different topic

    It's absolutely relevant. And I expect your response to it. You say Islamic slavery is about helping the poor. Yet, one of the things permissible in Islamic slavery includes the enslavement of women to be raped. So answer the point: Why is this permissible?

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #35 - October 13, 2014, 05:18 PM

    How does this fall into shaping the 'slaves were permitted because they were poor' hypothesis?


    hmm but where does it say he was not poor Huh??? he could be poor and the prophet didn't realize that
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #36 - October 13, 2014, 05:21 PM

    that is a very different topic in fact I'm planing to do a very interesting research on the topic of hell in islam wither it's permanent or temporary stay tuned for it i know i will get nagitive views on it and people will say Bullshit but hay everyone has his own opinion and just a question you have a picture of a child holding the quran and you call yourself agnostic muslim and seams you are in the bar of leaving islam I'm i right?


    Well let's say I have arrived at a position where I am basically a secular, Agnostic person of Muslim background who's family and loved ones are still Muslim and so it is easier to go by the label Muslim so as to keep the peace with them and not upset those I love.

    I look forward to your thoughts on Hell.

    Peace Smiley
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #37 - October 13, 2014, 05:22 PM

    and the point of the comment?

     The point, my friend, is that you have something of a conundrum on your hands. Think about it truthfully. Could you, in your position as a believer, ever conclude that slavery as practiced by Muhammad was immoral? No matter what you read about the enslavement of children, the rape of women, or speaking ill of runaways, you still have to figure out a way to conclude that Islamic slavery was somehow good. You are restricted to a certain conclusion before you can even begin to explore
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #38 - October 13, 2014, 05:24 PM

    Last time I checked, it was not permissible to enslave Muslims that were born free. This is a problem for your hypothesis.
    So is Islamic slavery about helping the poor or not? Clearly not. Another problem for your hypothesis.
    It's absolutely relevant. And I expect your response to it. You say Islamic slavery is about helping the poor. Yet, one of the things permissible in Islamic slavery includes the enslavement of women to be raped. So answer the point: Why is this permissible?




    you didn't understand yet I didn't said this is apsolote evidence about islam allowance for slavery it's a hypothesis

    anyway

    (Quote from: AhmedZaid9119 on Today at 04:38 PM
    1-they did they were slave muslims and non muslim slaves

    Last time I checked, it was not permissible to enslave Muslims that were born free. )

    there is no limit anyway last time i check to what a slave should be a slave can be anyway EVEN in islam a muslims is a slave to allah the prophet himself said he is a slave to allah so slave can be anyway

    (Quote from: AhmedZaid9119 on Today at 04:38 PM
    2-when you capture them how do you keep them even now when you go to war in another country and you capture enemy soldiers and put them in prisons they are basically captives not slaves

    So is Islamic slavery about helping the poor or not?)

    i was currecting your peach about the war prisoners being slaves no they are called captives


    (It's absolutely relevant. And I expect your response to it. You say Islamic slavery is about helping the poor. Yet, one of the things permissible in Islamic slavery includes the enslavement of women to be raped. So answer the point: Why is this permissible?)

    the burden of proof is on you you said islam allow slavery to woman so they can be raped (fornication) (sex before marrige) please provide the proof
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #39 - October 13, 2014, 05:37 PM

    The point, my friend, is that you have something of a conundrum on your hands. Think about it truthfully. Could you, in your position as a believer, ever conclude that slavery as practiced by Muhammad was immoral? No matter what you read about the enslavement of children, the rape of women, or speaking ill of runaways, you still have to figure out a way to conclude that Islamic slavery was somehow good. You are restricted to a certain conclusion before you can even begin to explore


    it's really not a conundrum but a very simple hypothesis that I'm looking for evidence to back it up so if i found evidence for it it could be the ultimate answer to why islam allowed slavery secound now let me ask you if you see someone on street wearing or acting like what anciant egyptians did you are gonna call him stupid right?Huh? but are you gonna blame ancient egyptians on the way they acted and how they weared there clothes back then??? no I'm quite sure not same thing apply on islam slavery was a social norm ofcourse islam came with a diffrent systems i do agree some sahih hadiths seams to contrdict quran which is why i reject them

    Ka’b bin Malik narrates: The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him, fainted for an hour. When he had a relief he said: “Fear Allah! Fear Allah! In the treatment of what your right hands posses (i.e. slaves). Cover their backs (i.e. clothe them), fill their bellies and be kind to them in speaking.” (Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, Translated by S. Moinul Haq, Kitab Bhavan, New Delhi 2009 vol.2 p.317 The narration has been authenticated by Albani in Sahih al-Targhib wal-Tarhib Hadith 2288)

    “… the immediate abolition or attempted abolition of slavery in Roman empire would probably have led to the collapse of the society.” (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Edited by James Hasting, T & T Clark, London 2003 vol. 11 p.602 Art. Slavery (Christianity))

    “Master of a slave-woman; who teaches her good manners, educates her in the best possible way (the religion), manumits her and then marries her.” (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2358)

    “Never should a believer kill a believer; but (If it so happens) by mistake, (Compensation is due): If one (so) kills a believer, it is ordained that he should free a believing slave …” (Qur’an 4:92)

    Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari: The Prophet said, "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity (by paying his ransom)." (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 4954)

    “The Prophet, may Allah bless him, ordered people to manumit slaves during the solar eclipse." (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2335) The same is true for lunar eclipses cf. Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2336

    The Prophet , may Allah bless him, was narrated to have said; "He who slaps his slave or beats him, the expiation for it is that he should set him free" (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 3130)

    “If Salim, the freed-slave of Abu Huzaifa were alive I would have made him the Caliph.” (Tarikh al-Tabari 2/420)

    Also we have learnt that; “From thirteen to nineteen mawlas (i.e. freed-slaves) were present at Badr. Proper shares were allotted to them [in booty].” (Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir vol. 2 p.21)

    Rabi’ bin ‘Amir said in the court of the Persian warlord, Rustam; “Allah has raised us to rescue whoever he wills from the slavery of (fellow) humans and to make them (devoted) servants of Allah. And to deliver them from the cage of materialism guiding them to the magnanimity of spirituality. And to liberate them from tyranny of [different religions and] systems] leading them to the equity of Islam.” (al-Bidaya wal Nihaya 7/46)


    Now i can go on and you could refer me to some problematic hadiths about slavery which i probably already know about them but the point is slavery was a pre-islamic problem not islamic
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #40 - October 13, 2014, 05:42 PM

    Well let's say I have arrived at a position where I am basically a secular, Agnostic person of Muslim background who's family and loved ones are still Muslim and so it is easier to go by the label Muslim so as to keep the peace with them and not upset those I love.

    I look forward to your thoughts on Hell.

    Peace Smiley


    sure it will be very interesting reasearch i could make a blogspost account and post it there it think it will track too much attention because the main idea behind it is to prove Islamic hell isn't permanent but temporary according to sevral hadiths i found and Arabic words in quranic verses i know you will like the Idea that hell in islam is not permanent but temporary i know you and probably all ex-muslims here (if you consider yourself one of them) gonna be skeptic to it but deep down you will actually like the idea i think it will be the best work i will do so far so stay tuned for it i will post it here first i know i might get nagitive responses by saying it's bullshit but deep down you know you want it to be true and that islamic hell isn't perminant

     thnkyu and Peace Smiley
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #41 - October 13, 2014, 05:46 PM

    there is no limit anyway last time i check to what a slave should be a slave can be anyway EVEN in islam a muslims is a slave to allah the prophet himself said he is a slave to allah so slave can be anyway

    In what way is a Muslim a slave to Allah? We are currently talking about enslavement against a person's will. Actual real-world slavery. I don't think this is what you have in mind when you say Muslims are slaves to Allah. I think you are naively thinking you can switch to a softer definition of slavery mid-discussion and hope nobody picks up on it.

    i was currecting your peach about the war prisoners being slaves no they are called captives

    Captives that can be used as slaves, thus slaves. For example: If I go into a prison, pick out a few captives, and enslave them, they are now slaves.

    the burden of proof is on you you said islam allow slavery to woman so they can be raped (fornication) (sex before marrige) please provide the proof


    O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
    - 33:50


    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #42 - October 13, 2014, 05:51 PM

    Would spend more time on giving you hadith and addressing your non-answer, but I'll have to wait until I get home.

    Do you think Umar knew the rules well enough? I always liked this one because of the all-around awfulness. Before you go saying, "But wait, it was Umar," I suggest you ask yourself the question why God would have so misled the people of Mohammad's time the instant the Prophet was gone:

    Yahya related to me from Malik that Abdullah ibn Dinar said, "A man came to Abdullah ibn Umar when I waswith him at the place where judgments were given and asked him about the suckling of an older person. Abdullah ibn Umar replied, 'A man came to Umar ibn al-Khattab and said, 'I have a slave-girl and I used to have intercourse with her. My wife went to her and suckled her. When I went to the girl, my wife told me to watch out, because she had suckled her!' Umar told him to beat his wife and to go to his slave-girl because kinship by suckling was only by the suckling of the young.' "

    وَحَدَّثَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ دِينَارٍ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ وَأَنَا مَعَهُ عِنْدَ دَارِ الْقَضَاءِ يَسْأَلُهُ عَنْ رَضَاعَةِ الْكَبِيرِ فَقَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ فَقَالَ إِنِّي كَانَتْ لِي وَلِيدَةٌ وَكُنْتُ أَطَؤُهَا فَعَمَدَتِ امْرَأَتِي إِلَيْهَا فَأَرْضَعَتْهَا فَدَخَلْتُ عَلَيْهَا فَقَالَتْ دُونَكَ فَقَدْ وَاللَّهِ أَرْضَعْتُهَا ‏.‏ فَقَالَ عُمَرُ أَوْجِعْهَا وَأْتِ جَارِيتَكَ فَإِنَّمَا الرَّضَاعَةُ رَضَاعَةُ الصَّغِيرِ ‏.‏

    http://sunnah.com/urn/413080
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #43 - October 13, 2014, 05:59 PM

    it's really not a conundrum but a very simple hypothesis that I'm looking for evidence to back it up so if i found evidence for it it could be the ultimate answer to why islam allowed slavery secound now let me ask you if you see someone on street wearing or acting like what anciant egyptians did you are gonna call him stupid right?Huh? but are you gonna blame ancient egyptians on the way they acted and how they weared there clothes back then??? no I'm quite sure not same thing apply on islam slavery was a social norm ofcourse islam came with a diffrent systems i do agree some sahih hadiths seams to contrdict quran which is why i reject them

    Ka’b bin Malik narrates: The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him, fainted for an hour. When he had a relief he said: “Fear Allah! Fear Allah! In the treatment of what your right hands posses (i.e. slaves). Cover their backs (i.e. clothe them), fill their bellies and be kind to them in speaking.” (Ibn Sa’d’s Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, Translated by S. Moinul Haq, Kitab Bhavan, New Delhi 2009 vol.2 p.317 The narration has been authenticated by Albani in Sahih al-Targhib wal-Tarhib Hadith 2288)

    “… the immediate abolition or attempted abolition of slavery in Roman empire would probably have led to the collapse of the society.” (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Edited by James Hasting, T & T Clark, London 2003 vol. 11 p.602 Art. Slavery (Christianity))

    “Master of a slave-woman; who teaches her good manners, educates her in the best possible way (the religion), manumits her and then marries her.” (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2358)

    “Never should a believer kill a believer; but (If it so happens) by mistake, (Compensation is due): If one (so) kills a believer, it is ordained that he should free a believing slave …” (Qur’an 4:92)

    Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari: The Prophet said, "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity (by paying his ransom)." (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 4954)

    “The Prophet, may Allah bless him, ordered people to manumit slaves during the solar eclipse." (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2335) The same is true for lunar eclipses cf. Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2336

    The Prophet , may Allah bless him, was narrated to have said; "He who slaps his slave or beats him, the expiation for it is that he should set him free" (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 3130)

    “If Salim, the freed-slave of Abu Huzaifa were alive I would have made him the Caliph.” (Tarikh al-Tabari 2/420)

    Also we have learnt that; “From thirteen to nineteen mawlas (i.e. freed-slaves) were present at Badr. Proper shares were allotted to them [in booty].” (Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir vol. 2 p.21)

    Rabi’ bin ‘Amir said in the court of the Persian warlord, Rustam; “Allah has raised us to rescue whoever he wills from the slavery of (fellow) humans and to make them (devoted) servants of Allah. And to deliver them from the cage of materialism guiding them to the magnanimity of spirituality. And to liberate them from tyranny of [different religions and] systems] leading them to the equity of Islam.” (al-Bidaya wal Nihaya 7/46)


    Now i can go on and you could refer me to some problematic hadiths about slavery which i probably already know about them but the point is slavery was a pre-islamic problem not islamic


    So, slavery as Muhammad practiced it was teh awesome. Got it. Would you like to see it practiced like that today in your hometown, amongst the people and community you know, (to help keep poor people off the streets)? Why or why not?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #44 - October 13, 2014, 06:02 PM

    I had a bit of trouble tracking your citations but I'm just going to assume it's my own error.

    “… the immediate abolition or attempted abolition of slavery in Roman empire would probably have led to the collapse of the society.” (Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Edited by James Hasting, T & T Clark, London 2003 vol. 11 p.602 Art. Slavery (Christianity))



    If done by a human, yes. Weird how limited Islam seems to be by its time frame, almost as if it is man-made.(Also assuming you're thinking it was the same with the Arabs)

    Quote from: (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2358
    “Master of a slave-woman; who teaches her good manners, educates her in the best possible way (the religion), manumits her and then marries her.”


    What if she doesn't want to get married to him? or does free will not apply to slaves?

    Quote from: Qur'an 4:92
    “Never should a believer kill a believer; but (If it so happens) by mistake, (Compensation is due): If one (so) kills a believer, it is ordained that he should free a believing slave …”


    Ignoring the clear linguistic problem in the Qur'an due to the fact that executions and stoning exist(that is also present in the Arabic version), are we also ignoring the amount of 'al mubashareen bel jannah' and sahaba who led wars against each other in their endless thirst for power?

    Quote
    Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari: The Prophet said, "Give food to the hungry, pay a visit to the sick and release (set free) the one in captivity (by paying his ransom)."


    Allowing people to 'free slaves' in the name of Islam does not explain why it was okay for these people to be slaves in the first place.

    “The Prophet, may Allah bless him, ordered people to manumit slaves during the solar eclipse." (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2335) The same is true for lunar eclipses cf. Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2336

    Quote
    The Prophet , may Allah bless him, was narrated to have said; "He who slaps his slave or beats him, the expiation for it is that he should set him free" (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 3130)


    I found something very similar to this in Sahih Muslim, Hadith 15:4079, but this hadith:

    Quote from:  Sahih Muslim, 5:2237
    'Umair, the freed slave of Abi'l-Lahm, said: My master commanded me to cut some meat in strips; (as I was doing it) a poor man came to me and I gave him some of it to eat. My master came to know of that, and he beat me. I came to the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) and narrated it to him. He (the Holy Prophet) summoned him and said: Why did you beat him? He (Abi'l-Lahm) said: He gives away my food without being commanded to do so. Upon this he (the Holy Prophet) said: The reward would be shared by you two.


    suggests that the slave was NOT freed, despite getting beaten.

    Quote
    Rabi’ bin ‘Amir said in the court of the Persian warlord, Rustam; “Allah has raised us to rescue whoever he wills from the slavery of (fellow) humans and to make them (devoted) servants of Allah. And to deliver them from the cage of materialism guiding them to the magnanimity of spirituality. And to liberate them from tyranny of [different religions and] systems] leading them to the equity of Islam.” (al-Bidaya wal Nihaya 7/46)


    Buuuuuuut they still captured slaves from wars.


    Quote
    Now i can go on and you could refer me to some problematic hadiths about slavery which i probably already know about them but the point is slavery was a pre-islamic problem not islamic


    It was a problem which Islam did not offer a solution to and thus, the Middle Eastern people who operate solely off Islam see no problem in enslaving (non-muslim?) kidnapped people as long as they don't beat them up too hard.

    أشهد أن لا إله
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #45 - October 13, 2014, 06:07 PM

    hmm but where does it say he was not poor Huh??? he could be poor and the prophet didn't realize that


    I mean that Muhammad had problems permitting people into his Islam because they were slaves. Surely that couldn't be divine?


    so the problem you have here is why muhammad killed her father and his men I'm I correct?


    How is that relevant?

    أشهد أن لا إله
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #46 - October 13, 2014, 06:28 PM

    In what way is a Muslim a slave to Allah? We are currently talking about enslavement against a person's will. Actual real-world slavery. I don't think this is what you have in mind when you say Muslims are slaves to Allah. I think you are naively thinking you can switch to a softer definition of slavery mid-discussion and hope nobody picks up on it.
    Captives that can be used as slaves, thus slaves. For example: If I go into a prison, pick out a few captives, and enslave them, they are now slaves.

    O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
    - 33:50





    (In what way is a Muslim a slave to Allah? We are currently talking about enslavement against a person's will. Actual real-world slavery. I don't think this is what you have in mind when you say Muslims are slaves to Allah. I think you are naively thinking you can switch to a softer definition of slavery mid-discussion and hope nobody picks up on it. )

    again like i said before there is no limit for slavery in islam like i said there is no where any hadith that said a slave characteristics should be this and that that is my point so slave can be anyone



    (Captives that can be used as slaves, thus slaves. For example: If I go into a prison, pick out a few captives, and enslave them, they are now slaves.)

    yes but that will take away the staess that they are captives but this is far away from the point the point is at what level should slaves be treated here  that is my whole point


    (O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
    - 33:50)

    OK here is the most important part of the

    let's start with this first I'll get to your point later on

    Ibn 'Abbas (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) as saying:
    A woman without a husband has more right to her person than her guardian, and a virgin's consent must be asked from her, and her silence implies her consent.
    حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ مَنْصُورٍ، وَقُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا مَالِكٌ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، بْنُ يَحْيَى - وَاللَّفْظُ لَهُ - قَالَ قُلْتُ لِمَالِكٍ حَدَّثَكَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْفَضْلِ، عَنْ نَافِعِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏ "‏ الأَيِّمُ أَحَقُّ بِنَفْسِهَا مِنْ وَلِيِّهَا وَالْبِكْرُ تُسْتَأْذَنُ فِي نَفْسِهَا وَإِذْنُهَا صُمَاتُهَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ نَعَمْ ‏.‏
    Reference    : Sahih Muslim 1421 a
    In-book reference    : Book 16, Hadith 78
    USC-MSA web (English) reference    : Book 8, Hadith 3306

    I asked the Prophet, "O Allah's (ﷺ)! Should the women be asked for their consent to their marriage?" He said, "Yes."
    Sahih al-Bukhari 6946

    now back into your verse the verse says :
    1-the prophet is promoted for his wives
    2-the prophet is promoted for his right hand possess
    and so on of other irrelevant options

    let us focus on 2 does it says it's lawfal for you to have sexual intercourse with them despite of there consent ?? NO i can't see that anywhere now i know your reply is "but you see that here in front of you it's lawful" in which i reply with OK? does it say it's lawful to force yourself on her?Huh?

    Imam Maalik  said:

    In our view the man who rapes a woman, whether she is a virgin or not, if she is a free woman he must pay a “dowry” like that of her peers, and if she is a slave he must pay whatever has been detracted from her value. The punishment is to be carried out on the rapist and there is no punishment for the woman who has been raped, whatever the case. End quote.

    Al-Muwatta’, 2/734

    Shaykh Salmaan al-Baaji said:

    In the case of a woman who is forced (raped): if she is a free woman, the one who forced her must pay her a “dowry” like that of her peers, and the hadd punishment is to be carried out on him. This is the view of al-Shaafa’i, and it is the view of al-Layth, and it was also narrated from ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib (may Allaah be pleased with him).

    Al-Muntaha Sharh al-Muwatta’, 5/268, 269

    Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr said:

    The scholars are unanimously agreed that the rapist is to be subjected to the hadd punishment if there is clear evidence against him that he deserves the hadd punishment, or if he admits to that. Otherwise, he is to be punished (i.e., if there is no proof that the hadd punishment for zina may be carried out against him because he does not confess, and there are not four witnesses, then the judge may punish him and stipulate a punishment that will deter him and others like him). There is no punishment for the woman if it is true that he forced her and overpowered her, which may be proven by her screaming and shouting for help. End quote.

    Al-Istidhkaar, 7/146

    Narrated Wa'il ibn Hujr:
    When a woman went out in the time of the Prophet (ﷺ) for prayer, a man attacked her and overpowered (raped) her.
    She shouted and he went off, and when a man came by, she said: That (man) did such and such to me. And when a company of the Emigrants came by, she said: That man did such and such to me. They went and seized the man whom they thought had had intercourse with her and brought him to her.
    She said: Yes, this is he. Then they brought him to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).
    When he (the Prophet) was about to pass sentence, the man who (actually) had assaulted her stood up and said: Messenger of Allah, I am the man who did it to her.
    He (the Prophet) said to her: Go away, for Allah has forgiven you. But he told the man some good words (AbuDawud said: meaning the man who was seized), and of the man who had had intercourse with her, he said: Stone him to death.
    He also said: He has repented to such an extent that if the people of Medina had repented similarly, it would have been accepted from them.
    Abu Dawud said: Asbat bin Nasr has also transmitted it from Simak.
    حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى بْنِ فَارِسٍ، حَدَّثَنَا الْفِرْيَابِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا إِسْرَائِيلُ، حَدَّثَنَا سِمَاكُ بْنُ حَرْبٍ، عَنْ عَلْقَمَةَ بْنِ وَائِلٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، أَنَّ امْرَأَةً، خَرَجَتْ عَلَى عَهْدِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم تُرِيدُ الصَّلاَةَ فَتَلَقَّاهَا رَجُلٌ فَتَجَلَّلَهَا فَقَضَى حَاجَتَهُ مِنْهَا فَصَاحَتْ وَانْطَلَقَ فَمَرَّ عَلَيْهَا رَجُلٌ فَقَالَتْ إِنَّ ذَاكَ فَعَلَ بِي كَذَا وَكَذَا وَمَرَّتْ عِصَابَةٌ مِنَ الْمُهَاجِرِينَ فَقَالَتْ إِنَّ ذَلِكَ الرَّجُلَ فَعَلَ بِي كَذَا وَكَذَا ‏.‏ فَانْطَلَقُوا فَأَخَذُوا الرَّجُلَ الَّذِي ظَنَّتْ أَنَّهُ وَقَعَ عَلَيْهَا فَأَتَوْهَا بِهِ فَقَالَتْ نَعَمْ هُوَ هَذَا ‏.‏ فَأَتَوْا بِهِ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَلَمَّا أَمَرَ بِهِ قَامَ صَاحِبُهَا الَّذِي وَقَعَ عَلَيْهَا فَقَالَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَنَا صَاحِبُهَا ‏.‏ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ اذْهَبِي فَقَدْ غَفَرَ اللَّهُ لَكِ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ وَقَالَ لِلرَّجُلِ قَوْلاً حَسَنًا ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ يَعْنِي الرَّجُلَ الْمَأْخُوذَ وَقَالَ لِلرَّجُلِ الَّذِي وَقَعَ عَلَيْهَا ‏"‏ ارْجُمُوهُ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ ‏"‏ لَقَدْ تَابَ تَوْبَةً لَوْ تَابَهَا أَهْلُ الْمَدِينَةِ لَقُبِلَ مِنْهُمْ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ رَوَاهُ أَسْبَاطُ بْنُ نَصْرٍ أَيْضًا عَنْ سِمَاكٍ ‏.‏
      حسن دون قوله ارجموه والأرجح أنه لم يرجم   (الألباني)   حكم     :
    Reference    : Sunan Abi Dawud 4379
    In-book reference    : Book 40, Hadith 29
    English translation    : Book 39, Hadith 4366


    but let us read 66:1-5
    O Prophet! Why holdest thou to be forbidden that which Allah has made lawful to thee? Thou seekest to please thy consorts. But Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
    Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths (in some cases): and Allah is your Protector, and He is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom.
    When the Prophet disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his consorts, and she then divulged it (to another), and Allah made it known to him, he confirmed part thereof and repudiated a part. Then when he told her thereof, she said, "Who told thee this? "He said, "He told me Who knows and is well-acquainted (with all things)."
    If ye two turn in repentance to Him, your hearts are indeed so inclined; But if ye back up each other against him, truly Allah is his Protector, and Gabriel, and (every) righteous one among those who believe,- and furthermore, the angels - will back (him) up.
    It may be, if he divorced you (all), that Allah will give him in exchange consorts better than you,- who submit (their wills), who believe, who are devout, who turn to Allah in repentance, who worship (in humility), who travel (for Faith) and fast,- previously married or virgins.


    This verses shows even that Muhammad had the right for sexual intercourse he didn't do it at the end

    NOW i know your reply is it will be "BUT IT"S SAY IT"S LAWFUL FOR YOU" again let me put you in Muhammad place if you told your brother for example that he is allowed to have sex with any woman people gonna reply with (Ishina IS ALLOWING HER BROTHER TO RAPE WOMEN) let me ask you are you gonna be ok with that?? please answer this
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #47 - October 13, 2014, 06:29 PM

    I mean that Muhammad had problems permitting people into his Islam because they were slaves. Surely that couldn't be divine?

    How is that relevant?


    because you mentioned the hadith that talk about killing her tribe
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #48 - October 13, 2014, 06:34 PM

    So, slavery as Muhammad practiced it was teh awesome. Got it. Would you like to see it practiced like that today in your hometown, amongst the people and community you know, (to help keep poor people off the streets)? Why or why not?


    did you not pay attention to the note i said at the end of the post read it and come back and say that i justified slavery don't be like stopspamming
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #49 - October 13, 2014, 06:35 PM

    Would spend more time on giving you hadith and addressing your non-answer, but I'll have to wait until I get home.

    Do you think Umar knew the rules well enough? I always liked this one because of the all-around awfulness. Before you go saying, "But wait, it was Umar," I suggest you ask yourself the question why God would have so misled the people of Mohammad's time the instant the Prophet was gone:

    Yahya related to me from Malik that Abdullah ibn Dinar said, "A man came to Abdullah ibn Umar when I waswith him at the place where judgments were given and asked him about the suckling of an older person. Abdullah ibn Umar replied, 'A man came to Umar ibn al-Khattab and said, 'I have a slave-girl and I used to have intercourse with her. My wife went to her and suckled her. When I went to the girl, my wife told me to watch out, because she had suckled her!' Umar told him to beat his wife and to go to his slave-girl because kinship by suckling was only by the suckling of the young.' "

    وَحَدَّثَنِي عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ دِينَارٍ، أَنَّهُ قَالَ جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ وَأَنَا مَعَهُ عِنْدَ دَارِ الْقَضَاءِ يَسْأَلُهُ عَنْ رَضَاعَةِ الْكَبِيرِ فَقَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عُمَرَ جَاءَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ فَقَالَ إِنِّي كَانَتْ لِي وَلِيدَةٌ وَكُنْتُ أَطَؤُهَا فَعَمَدَتِ امْرَأَتِي إِلَيْهَا فَأَرْضَعَتْهَا فَدَخَلْتُ عَلَيْهَا فَقَالَتْ دُونَكَ فَقَدْ وَاللَّهِ أَرْضَعْتُهَا ‏.‏ فَقَالَ عُمَرُ أَوْجِعْهَا وَأْتِ جَارِيتَكَ فَإِنَّمَا الرَّضَاعَةُ رَضَاعَةُ الصَّغِيرِ ‏.‏

    http://sunnah.com/urn/413080



    the hadith you gave has no sanad for it how could i know it's right?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #50 - October 13, 2014, 06:54 PM

    So the fact that Islam allows slavery, means that it can be activated by those who want to take slaves today. Seven thousand Yazidi girls enslaved, just because they are 'mushriks'

    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/islamic-state-officially-admits-to-enslaving-yazidi-women/


    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #51 - October 13, 2014, 06:56 PM

    I had a bit of trouble tracking your citations but I'm just going to assume it's my own error.

    If done by a human, yes. Weird how limited Islam seems to be by its time frame, almost as if it is man-made.(Also assuming you're thinking it was the same with the Arabs)

    What if she doesn't want to get married to him? or does free will not apply to slaves?

    Ignoring the clear linguistic problem in the Qur'an due to the fact that executions and stoning exist(that is also present in the Arabic version), are we also ignoring the amount of 'al mubashareen bel jannah' and sahaba who led wars against each other in their endless thirst for power?

    Allowing people to 'free slaves' in the name of Islam does not explain why it was okay for these people to be slaves in the first place.

    “The Prophet, may Allah bless him, ordered people to manumit slaves during the solar eclipse." (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2335) The same is true for lunar eclipses cf. Sahih Bukhari, Hadith 2336

    I found something very similar to this in Sahih Muslim, Hadith 15:4079, but this hadith:

    suggests that the slave was NOT freed, despite getting beaten.

    Buuuuuuut they still captured slaves from wars.


    It was a problem which Islam did not offer a solution to and thus, the Middle Eastern people who operate solely off Islam see no problem in enslaving (non-muslim?) kidnapped people as long as they don't beat them up too hard.


    (If done by a human, yes. Weird how limited Islam seems to be by its time frame, almost as if it is man-made.(Also assuming you're thinking it was the same with the Arabs))

    NO i'm not saying it was the same with arabs although it was a pre-islamic problem so islam is not the one that invited it

    secound BTW I'm an arab


    (What if she doesn't want to get married to him? or does free will not apply to slaves?)

    That is very simple a woman can be asked for her consent in anything even marrige

    Ibn 'Abbas (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) as saying:
    A woman without a husband has more right to her person than her guardian, and a virgin's consent must be asked from her, and her silence implies her consent.
    حَدَّثَنَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ مَنْصُورٍ، وَقُتَيْبَةُ بْنُ سَعِيدٍ، قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا مَالِكٌ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، بْنُ يَحْيَى - وَاللَّفْظُ لَهُ - قَالَ قُلْتُ لِمَالِكٍ حَدَّثَكَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ الْفَضْلِ، عَنْ نَافِعِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ ‏ "‏ الأَيِّمُ أَحَقُّ بِنَفْسِهَا مِنْ وَلِيِّهَا وَالْبِكْرُ تُسْتَأْذَنُ فِي نَفْسِهَا وَإِذْنُهَا صُمَاتُهَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ قَالَ نَعَمْ ‏.‏
    Reference    : Sahih Muslim 1421 a
    In-book reference    : Book 16, Hadith 78
    USC-MSA web (English) reference    : Book 8, Hadith 3306


    (Ignoring the clear linguistic problem in the Qur'an due to the fact that executions and stoning exist(that is also present in the Arabic version), are we also ignoring the amount of 'al mubashareen bel jannah' and sahaba who led wars against each other in their endless thirst for power?)

    Red harring what does this have to do with slave treatment in islam (Which is my main topic)

    (Allowing people to 'free slaves' in the name of Islam does not explain why it was okay for these people to be slaves in the first place.)

    Because they were slaves before Islam came in in the first place so let me ask you if you are a new ceo of a company you go to your company building and you see everything is messed up but you make a new law that organize and clear everything does this mean you are to be blamed for the mess that was there before you came?Huh??


    (I found something very similar to this in Sahih Muslim, Hadith 15:4079, but this hadith:

    Quote from:  Sahih Muslim, 5:2237
    'Umair, the freed slave of Abi'l-Lahm, said: My master commanded me to cut some meat in strips; (as I was doing it) a poor man came to me and I gave him some of it to eat. My master came to know of that, and he beat me. I came to the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) and narrated it to him. He (the Holy Prophet) summoned him and said: Why did you beat him? He (Abi'l-Lahm) said: He gives away my food without being commanded to do so. Upon this he (the Holy Prophet) said: The reward would be shared by you two.


    suggests that the slave was NOT freed, despite getting beaten.)

    OK credits for that I'm not gonna ignore this hadith but my question is was the slave beaten so badly but at the end the prophet gave the reward for both of you however you messed the poin of beating a slave i think the point is the slave should NOT be beaten badly and unjustly if someone gave something they showed be punished i see the slave was trying to help a poor man but at the end the prophet didn't beat the slave however this might considered theft as the prophet himself said

    It was narrated from Jabir that:
    a woman from Banu Makhzum stole (something), and she was brought to the Prophet. She sought the protection of Umm Salamah, but the Prophet said: "If Fatimah bint Muhammad were to steal, I would cut off her hand." And he ordered that her hand be cut off.
    أَخْبَرَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ مَعْدَانَ بْنِ عِيسَى، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ أَعْيَنَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا مَعْقِلٌ، عَنْ أَبِي الزُّبَيْرِ، عَنْ جَابِرٍ، أَنَّ امْرَأَةً، مِنْ بَنِي مَخْزُومٍ سَرَقَتْ فَأُتِيَ بِهَا النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَعَاذَتْ بِأُمِّ سَلَمَةَ فَقَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ لَوْ كَانَتْ فَاطِمَةَ بِنْتَ مُحَمَّدٍ لَقَطَعْتُ يَدَهَا ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقُطِعَتْ يَدُهَا ‏.‏
    Grade   : Sahih (Darussalam)   
    Reference    : Sunan an-Nasa'i 4891
    In-book reference    : Book 46, Hadith 22
    English translation    : Vol. 5, Book 46, Hadith 4895

    at the end I'm not saying the poor man stole the food and we don't know at what level the slave was beaten but muhammad didn't allow unjustified slave beaten as they are your brothers don't jump into conclusion that i think the poor man stole the food and that the slave deserved the beaten he got my point is this hadith seams to contradict the one i gave and we don't know at what level the slave was beaten

    (Rabi’ bin ‘Amir said in the court of the Persian warlord, Rustam; “Allah has raised us to rescue whoever he wills from the slavery of (fellow) humans and to make them (devoted) servants of Allah. And to deliver them from the cage of materialism guiding them to the magnanimity of spirituality. And to liberate them from tyranny of [different religions and] systems] leading them to the equity of Islam.” (al-Bidaya wal Nihaya 7/46)


    Buuuuuuut they still captured slaves from wars.)

    Buuuuuuut as the quote says it gave them EQUITY IN ISLAM show me a system that give slaves Equity in Islam

    (Quote
    Now i can go on and you could refer me to some problematic hadiths about slavery which i probably already know about them but the point is slavery was a pre-islamic problem not islamic


    It was a problem which Islam did not offer a solution to and thus, the Middle Eastern people who operate solely off Islam see no problem in enslaving (non-muslim?) kidnapped people as long as they don't beat them up too hard.)

    it did as i showed and provided several hadiths to you and others that muhammad commanded slaves to be set free my point is why can't you admit islam gave slaves more rights than before?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #52 - October 13, 2014, 07:04 PM

    I don't really understand what point you are trying to make Ahmad..  that muslims deserve a big pat on the back for (supposedly) treating their slaves better than others.. ? either way it was/is immoral and above all a cruel and wicked solution to poverty, what is the purpose of your post again ?    : )
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #53 - October 13, 2014, 07:08 PM

    So the fact that Islam allows slavery, means that it can be activated by those who want to take slaves today. Seven thousand Yazidi girls enslaved, just because they are 'mushriks'

    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/islamic-state-officially-admits-to-enslaving-yazidi-women/




    your point?? are you saying islam allow man to force sex to his slave?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #54 - October 13, 2014, 07:10 PM

    did you not pay attention to the note i said at the end of the post read it and come back and say that i justified slavery don't be like stopspamming


    What? So slavery was good when Muhammad did it, but that isn't a justification.  Huh?
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #55 - October 13, 2014, 07:11 PM

    I don't really understand what point you are trying to make Ahmad..  that muslims deserve a big pat on the back for (supposedly) treating their slaves better than others.. ? either way it was/is immoral and above all a cruel and wicked solution to poverty, what is the purpose of your post again ?    : )



    Read it please i don't condone slavery for first second the post i rised as in the TITLE was a hypothesis means it's not proven but let me give you too systems and ask you which one you prefer
    1-system that treat slaves like shit
    2-system that says your slaves are your brothers

    which one you will think is better?

    DAMN i didn't know this post will get that much replies
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #56 - October 13, 2014, 07:12 PM

    Slaves are slaves, no matter what the system.
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #57 - October 13, 2014, 07:14 PM

    your point?? are you saying islam allow man to force sex to his slave?


    Of course it does. A slave must do as his master bids. The hadiths explain that Quran 4:24 was revelaed for this specific purpose:

    Quote
    They took captives (women) on the day of Autas who had their husbands. They were afraid (to have sexual intercourse with them) when this verse was revealed:" And women already married except those whom you right hands posses" (iv. 24)

    http://sunnah.com/muslim/17#43

    Quote
    Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.

    http://sunnah.com/abudawud/12#110
  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #58 - October 13, 2014, 07:14 PM

    What? So slavery was good when Muhammad did it, but that isn't a justification.  Huh?


    NO my point is
    1-slavery was a pre-islamic problem NOT ISLAMIC PROBLEM
    2-islam unlike the previous system provided better rights for slaves yes you can refer to some incidences but the point is islam treatment to slavery was different
    3-masters was commanded in islam to pay the randsome and free the slaves
    4-slaves were not brothers the int pre-islamic system

  • The Hypothesis or slavery allowance (if that is how it called) in Islam
     Reply #59 - October 13, 2014, 07:20 PM


    Read it please i don't condone slavery for first second the post i rised as in the TITLE was a hypothesis means it's not proven but let me give you too systems and ask you which one you prefer
    1-system that treat slaves like shit
    2-system that says your slaves are your brothers

    which one you will think is better?

    DAMN i didn't know this post will get that much replies


    Neither..  there were many cruel practices that mohammed turned a blind eye to, as everyone already said above this only proves that he was just a man of his day, not a prophet of God.
  • Previous page 1 23 4 ... 11 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »