dear Absurdist ., in your response to the the title of this thread, you have added whole lot of issues and de-focussed/confused everything and the readers.
You went from calling a Shia Clerk as
Western-centric anti-Saudi circle jerk ., .... to saying
"human rights abuse in the sand kingdom are not right" ; .....to coupling your post with that Robert Fisk article
in independent.co.uk . That is simply drifting away from problems which are created by the SAUDI SAUD REGIME OF SAND LAND along with western powers for the sake of oil under sand land.
Let me respond point wise
I just think it's unwise to say things like "Fuck Saudi Arabia" when we know that can pander to the Western-centric anti-Saudi circle jerk. I understand the frustration, but it doesn't do any good for progress in Saudi.
Sorry to say this but every reader understands what Happy_M meant there by putting a heading "
"Fuck Saudi Arabia" ., The insult is meant for its government., it is meant for its judiciary system that gives beheading orders which i controlled by sauds of sand land., ., It means the Sauds of sand land for the sake of their power persecute any one in Saudi Arabia who opposes their regime...
by writing
"Fuck Saudi Arabia" "Happy_M didn't mean to fuck the Sands of Saudi Arabia........ Did not mean to fuck the oil under the sand land........ and last but not least did not mean to Insult folks in Saudi Arabia.." I am sure you who wrote some 9000 posts into this forum and you must have read at least another 10000 posts., sure will understand what Happy_meant there. And I guess you are calling Shia Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr of Arabia as
"Western-centric anti-Saudi circle jerk. ".. I don't think that is right., He may be Iran centric .. he may be Russian centric.. He may be Shia Centric.. BUT HE CAN NOT BE WESTERN CENTRIC...
Absurdist
"correct me if I am wrong"