that is a good response bogart ., internet forum bombs are ok., and i want to be far away from real bombs., I also have plenty patience and thick skin to take as many
internet bombs as I can read and respond., Life experiences taught me to be patient
...Yes it was a bomb as I have little interest in teaching people basic reading comprehension, application of this combined with analysis techniques they should already be capable of using.
well basic reading of words in your post is different from analyzing your post with comprehensive rational and logical skills and you seem to assume that all readers are as good as you are w.r.t. understanding complex subjects like
"Freethinking and free will"., I was pointing out that you are unable nor are interested in figuring out how my answer applies to all your questions.
well I may be unable and my not have high level comprehensive skills, but but I am interested reading and understanding of the thoughts of intelligent well educated folks on this
free thinking and free will subjects .
And i am of the opinion. if majority of human folks on earth understand those two words and apply that
free thinking and free will in their day to day life ., that will solve lot of problem of future generations.
It is a fair comparison as it is a method of thought that is applicable for anything that wishes to use it. ...
No...NO...NOoooo that is not fair comparison.,
I mean there is 1000 years of time difference differences between the people( THE MU'TAZILITES) who said "QURAN IS NOT WORD OF GOD" and 18/19/20th century folks like you named., such as
David Hume, Einstein, Hawkings,
VoltaireHowever my point about the Mu'tazila is that their view is incoherent now. ., Just because it is something people find more comfort in doesn't make it coherent.
Off course the concept of Mu'tazila is NOT coherent now.,
And I never said they are coherent now., In fact those guys of 8th century who happened to born in Islamic community themselves agree that they were NOT absolutely correct and 100% coherent ., But w..r,t the times they were in., their views were lot more coherent than any scientist and faith heads of
that time and even in every faith heads of the present time..
anyway your answer to this question 4 of mine is interesting
4). Do these freethinkers have to be atheists and absolute atheists? or can any followers of any faiths /religions could also be free thinkers? and and can you give some examples of free thinkers since the time of Aristotle
Any individual that follows scripture and traditions of a religion can not by definition be an absolute free thinker. Deists can be as they are not theists thus are not required to follow said methods of thought. Theists can exercise a partial adoption of free thinking as a method and do so in academia all the time. However this is situational only as academia forces one to do so. However as a method of thought this creates conflicts and contradiction in their larger worldview which follows a different method of thought. Agnostics that do not follow a tradition, sorry Hassan, can be as well.
Hume, Einstein, Hawkings, Voltaire
There I would like to say., Mu'tazilites never followed Quran and did not consider Quran is a word of some allah god., here is what they tried to argue and explore on the subject f Quran
Mu`tazilites believed that
good and evil were not determined by revealed scripture or interpretation of scripture, but rational categories that could be "established through unaided reason;[5][8][9][10] because knowledge was derived from reason, reason was the "final arbiter" in distinguishing right from wrong.[11] The Mu`tazili school of Kalam posited that the injunctions of God are accessible to rational thought and inquiry, and that it is reason, not "sacred precedent", that is an effective means of determining what is just, and obligatory in religion.[11]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu%CA%BFtazila So bogart just curious about your thoughts ., with these words,
Any individual that follows scripture and traditions of a religion can not by definition be an absolute free thinker. ..... bogart
1).
did you mean to say that Absolute free thinkers have to be absolute Atheists? .
And as you pointed out that "
Agnostics that do not follow a tradition"., hence
2).
can we also consider Agnostics as some sort of free thinkers explorers of unknown subjects ?? with best regards
yeezevee