Sorry, Omaar, but I don't have the time nor the desire to go through that very long article. A brief look tells me it isn't worth the effort.
What is interesting to note though is that many Muslims have now had to shift the debate about embryology in Qur'an from the more striking claim that the Qur'an describes embryology long before it was known about - to: The Qur'an's description of embryology is much better than those of the Greeks and others.
And to do this they are having to rely more and more on giving meanings to words that they simply don't have.
What Muslims used to be impressed by was the claim that the Qur'an revealed something that was not known.
Arguing very dubiously that; the Qur'an has slightly better descriptions than previous ones - is far less impressive.
Hence I've always said that the so-called scientific miracles are nothing less than linguistic gymnastics to prove already known information. If they want a miracle then it should tell people something new, right now, that we don't know about. To claim the Qur'an has miracles would be like a person, a day after the lotto claiming that the results he wrote down the night before (after the lotto results were announced) that he has powers to see into the future. It only a miracle if it it was founded BEFORE science proved it.
Damn Muslims are so silly, its like the dick who says, "ooh, I knew that was going to happen" after the event occurs.