Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
Today at 09:50 AM

What's happened to the fo...
Yesterday at 11:58 AM

New Britain
October 05, 2025, 08:07 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
October 05, 2025, 07:55 AM

Kashmir endgame
October 04, 2025, 10:05 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
October 04, 2025, 09:23 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
October 02, 2025, 12:48 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
October 02, 2025, 12:03 PM

الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
September 24, 2025, 11:55 AM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
September 20, 2025, 07:39 PM

Jesus mythicism
by zeca
September 13, 2025, 10:59 PM

Orientalism - Edward Said
by zeca
August 22, 2025, 07:41 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Women

 (Read 63584 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 10 11 1213 14 15 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Women
     Reply #330 - April 10, 2010, 05:07 PM

    So you're sure that all men are physically stronger than all women, is that right?

    If we're comparing equals, then yes. For example, an average guy would be physically stronger than an average girl, an average male bodybuilder stronger than an average female bodybuilder, etc.

    And even if they are, do you go around calling men, little boys? How about gimps? Anorexics? Cancer-ridden?

    Actually a lot of guys are called little boys, gimps, etc. Obviously calling them a name of a disease would be offensive to the people who have that disease, and then there would be massive campaigns against that. But they do get called a lot of names that don't have anything to do with women.

    So first of all, you presume all women are physically weaker and mentally stronger (whatever that means because ultimately it doesn't seem to count, your stereotype still trumps women's supposed physical weakness over their mental strength). Then you use that supposed weakness to use women as curse words for men.

    Yeah you're not practicing sexism at all! Cheesy

    A bitch actually means a female dog more than a human female. Female dogs are often submissive and seen whimpering.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #331 - April 10, 2010, 05:08 PM

    From my experience with forums @li's behavior would not be tolerated. Seems that this forum is quite lax.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #332 - April 10, 2010, 05:10 PM

    You are assuming the right to decide what makes other suffers and what doesn't.

    According to this logic the police shouldn't have laws against stabbing someone because who are they to decide what is harmful and what isn't. They're just projecting their views on everyone else. Roll Eyes

    Physical discomfort is suffering. If someone likes to cut themsleves or harm their body in other ways, you would have to be insane or pretty evil to suggest that they shouldn't seek help.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #333 - April 10, 2010, 05:12 PM

    I agree. No one chooses to be overweight or unhealthy.

    That's not true.

    Some people choose to be overweight.
    Some other people simply don't mind it, but they think that dieting or exercising are not a better trade off than staying unhealthy.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #334 - April 10, 2010, 05:12 PM

    At this point I will stop talking to you. You have morbid reasoning.

     Roll Eyes Apparently anything that proves you wrong is morbid reasoning.

    From my experience with forums @li's behavior would not be tolerated. Seems that this forum is quite lax.

    Says the person who made this thread
  • Re: Women
     Reply #335 - April 10, 2010, 05:13 PM

    If we're comparing equals, then yes. For example, an average guy would be physically stronger than an average girl, an average male bodybuilder stronger than an average female bodybuilder, etc.


    Women in sexist cultures are not taught how to defend themselves. That's why they are physically limited. Even so, where is this "average guy" and this "average girl"? These differences are always statistical, they are not true of everyone and your stereotyping is only a sign of your need to continue to pretend that you are "stronger" than women.

    Actually a lot of guys are called little boys, gimps, etc. Obviously calling them a name of a disease would be offensive to the people who have that disease, and then there would be massive campaigns against that.  


    Assuming that even if "women" as a whole are physically weaker, and you wouldn't call someone with a disease that makes them weaker than you a derogatory name, or use their disease as a curse word to throw around, what is it that in your mind justifies using derogatory names for women to use as insults on men? Do you see the ethical contradiction you've gotten yourself into? Or did that just go over your head, what with you according to your own stereotype, being mentally weaker and all?


    Female dogs are often submissive and seen whimpering.


    Not all dogs whimper. Those that do, the male dogs are "submissive" and whimpering as much as female dogs. Analogy fail.

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #336 - April 10, 2010, 05:14 PM

    That's not true.

    Some people choose to be overweight.
    Some other people simply don't mind it, but they think that dieting or exercising are not a better trade off than staying unhealthy.


    Not to mention that plenty of men (and women I'm assuming) prefer the BBW physique.

    The language of the mob was only the language of public opinion cleansed of hypocrisy and restraint - Hannah Arendt.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #337 - April 10, 2010, 05:14 PM

    From my experience with forums @li's behavior would not be tolerated. Seems that this forum is quite lax.


    We just give people plenty of rope for them to hang themselves with.  Afro

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #338 - April 10, 2010, 05:18 PM

    According to this logic the police shouldn't have laws against stabbing someone because who are they to decide what is harmful and what isn't. They're just projecting their views on everyone else. Roll Eyes

    Fallacious comparison.
    We are talking about behaviors that affect the self or consensual parties.

    Some people derive pleasure from being whipped or electrocuted.
    But it's still logical to forbid people from whipping or electrocuting somebody when the consent cannot be determined.

    Physical discomfort is suffering. If someone likes to cut themsleves or harm their body in other ways, you would have to be insane or pretty evil to suggest that they shouldn't seek help.

    Two fallacies:

    1) You are automatically assuming what is physical discomfort and what is not... for some people, dieting or exercising ARE physical discomforts greater than being fat. But you are assuming everyone must agree with your point of view.

    2) Even if they were "absolute physical discomfort", if people derived pleasure from it, why should they seek help? What is the purpose? For what moral reason should they be converted to your point of view?

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #339 - April 10, 2010, 05:19 PM

    Not to mention that plenty of men (and women I'm assuming) prefer the BBW physique.

    Exactly.
    I mentioned that earlier ^_^

    For some, fatness is a desirable sexual trait.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #340 - April 10, 2010, 05:20 PM

    Well I am off to stuff my face with food while staying thin like Skeletor <3
    Brb later for more internet fights.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #341 - April 10, 2010, 05:21 PM

    Ciao Tlaloc Smiley

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #342 - April 10, 2010, 05:21 PM

    Roll Eyes Apparently anything that proves you wrong is morbid reasoning.
    Says the person who made this thread


    Correction I did not post that thread. I left my computer on and a friend thought it would be funny to post that, since it was a rant. And rants are permitted on the forum. What you are doing is subtle flame at the expense of others. These kind of posts look negative no the community and that is one of the main reasons firm action is taking when such posts are posted. Good luck though.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #343 - April 10, 2010, 05:23 PM

    Jamie, you might want to mention that in that thread. Also, in the future, please make sure such breaches of your account do not occur. The mods have discussed that thread and we will not be accountable if your account is put on restricted or banned if someone else uses it to abuse the forum. Thanks.

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #344 - April 10, 2010, 05:23 PM

    See, ignorance like this is annoying. 

    Do you even have any idea of how many medical conditions there are that can cause obesity in a person that can't be magically fixed with your "If they spent their energy exercising" claim?



    You got me there, I hadn't thought of that. But I wonder if someone who has an illness that causes him to be obese, would really be able to browse internet forums and type.

    In either case you alerted me to something I hadn't thought of, so may be I should be more careful. Thank you Smiley
  • Re: Women
     Reply #345 - April 10, 2010, 05:25 PM

    What you are doing is subtle flame at the expense of others. These kind of posts look negative no the community and that is one of the main reasons firm action is taking when such posts are posted. Good luck though.

    What I'm doing is a respectful debate which happens here all the time, what you're doing is personal attacks on me which is not tolerated.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #346 - April 10, 2010, 05:26 PM

    Jamie, you might want to mention that in that thread. Also, in the future, please make sure such breaches of your account do not occur. The mods have discussed that thread and we will not be accountable if your account is put on restricted or banned if someone else uses it to abuse the forum. Thanks.


    My account will not be used by anyone else other then me. But if you want to ban me for that thread then fair enough since I did let someone else use my account.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #347 - April 10, 2010, 05:26 PM

    You got me there, I hadn't thought of that. But I wonder if someone who has an illness that causes him to be obese, would really be able to browse internet forums and type.

    In either case you alerted me to something I hadn't thought of, so may be I should be more careful. Thank you Smiley


    Why not?  it's not hard to sit at your pc, or lie back on your sofa with a laptop, and use your fingers to type.  I've been online when I've been super ill, with a bucket just incase lol eyes rolling and fever running, still lurking and reading, and sometimes typing whatever.

    It's not just bedridden illnesses that cause obesity.

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #348 - April 10, 2010, 05:27 PM

    What I'm doing is a respectful debate which happens here all the time, what you're doing is personal attacks on me which is not tolerated.


    Can you point out where I did a person attack on you?
  • Re: Women
     Reply #349 - April 10, 2010, 05:27 PM

    My account will not be used by anyone else other then me. But if you want to ban me for that thread then fair enough since I did let someone else use my account.


    You're not being banned yet. Consider it a friendly suggestion that you post something explaining that thread in that thread itself since people are wondering. Thanks.

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #350 - April 10, 2010, 05:33 PM

    You're not being banned yet. Consider it a friendly suggestion that you post something explaining that thread in that thread itself since people are wondering. Thanks.


    Sorry that seems rather petty I think you can just ban me I will not be giving an explanation just because as an administrator you want to push me around. I explained myself here it was an honest mistake, and it will not happen. But asking me to explain myself more then I have already is unreasonable considering the behavior of @li, Prince, and a few others in this thread.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #351 - April 10, 2010, 05:35 PM

    No reason to ban you yet. Everyone has bad days. You posted a thread abusing members of this forum, you should be explaining yourself there not here where this is off-topic.

    Do you know of any other reason why you should be banned?

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #352 - April 10, 2010, 05:36 PM

    Some people derive pleasure from being whipped or electrocuted.
    But it's still logical to forbid people from whipping or electrocuting somebody when the consent cannot be determined.

    Regardless of whether its done to yourself or to someone else, physical damage/harm's definition remains the same. If someone likes to harm themselves, they have psychological problems that they should get sorted out.

    I've never met anyone who derives pleasure from being electrocuted, and I'm pretty sure if such a person exists, their life is messed up in a lot of other areas too, which again shows a pattern of psychological problems.

    Quote
    1) You are automatically assuming what is physical discomfort and what is not... for some people, dieting or exercising ARE physical discomforts greater than being fat. But you are assuming everyone must agree with your point of view.

    Exercise is not a discomfort if you start small and get bigger with time. If someone starts with tiny weights they can easy lift, or starts with slow/fast walking and works his way up to running, it would not be a discomfort. They're simply using a wrong technique if it causes them discomfort. Everyone can start with something in their comfort zone.

    2) Even if they were "absolute physical discomfort", if people derived pleasure from it, why should they seek help? What is the purpose? For what moral reason should they be converted to your point of view?

    Because it shows clear psychological problems if someone derives pleasure from being kept in the state of a lot of discomfort. In order to help them become productive members of the society they should see a therapist. I've never met a fat person who is happy with his life, overall.

    Anyway, this discussion is going in circles now. If someone really wanted to be fat, they wouldn't care about the insults that come with it. If I want to marry a black girl, I will become the laughing stock of my family but that wouldn't stop me from doing it if I wanted to. I have a big nose too. You can make all sorts of jokes about big noses if you want, but that wouldn't cause me to want to get a plastic surgery. If someone genuinely wanted to be fat, they wouldn't be offended by jokes about it.

    That's all I gotta say on this.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #353 - April 10, 2010, 05:38 PM

    Allat since you are the Admin why are you asking me to do something redundant? It makes no sense to me. You will still have the same explanation if I explain in that thread. I just find is silly. Are you joking with me?

    I don't know about any other reasons to be banned.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #354 - April 10, 2010, 05:41 PM

    I am asking you to not post off topic posts here and instead post your explanation in that thread where lots of people are wondering why you as a brand new member would post something abusive of members here. Not everyone who will go through that thread, will go through the 20 pages of this thread to find your explanation. That thread could be used against you like @li just did untill you go in there and explain what you explained here.

    You don't want to do it, fine.

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #355 - April 10, 2010, 05:42 PM

    In fact just ban me. You silly little bitch on a power trip. No I can make you do something, ban me! women like you are not born they are excreted.
  • Re: Women
     Reply #356 - April 10, 2010, 05:44 PM

    Oh hello Tut. Cheesy We were almost sure it was you. Yes you've been given enough rope on this account.

    Keep on creating sock puppets here. We LOVE how much you just can't get away and get a life for yourself. See you around next time.  Wink

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Women
     Reply #357 - April 10, 2010, 05:46 PM

    Women in sexist cultures are not taught how to defend themselves. That's why they are physically limited. Even so, where is this "average guy" and this "average girl"? These differences are always statistical, they are not true of everyone and your stereotyping is only a sign of your need to continue to pretend that you are "stronger" than women.

    Regardless of whether I have a protector instinct towards women or not, I did say that if we compare equals, men are physically stronger. If Jenny learns martial arts, she will be able to kick the ass of Bob who isn't trained in martial arts. But if Bob gets equal training in martial arts, he will be
    stronger than Jenny.

    Assuming that even if "women" as a whole are physically weaker, and you wouldn't call someone with a disease that makes them weaker than you a derogatory name, or use their disease as a curse word to throw around, what is it that in your mind justifies using derogatory names for women to use as insults on men? Do you see the ethical contradiction you've gotten yourself into? Or did that just go over your head, what with you according to your own stereotype, being mentally weaker and all?

    Its exactly because I don't consider women to be inferior or in need of any special protection that I'm not bothered by use of words like 'girly man' or 'sissy'. If someone called someone else the name of a disease, I wouldn't like that because it would be making fun of the patients of that disease. Women don't have any disease or are inferior in any way.

  • Re: Women
     Reply #358 - April 10, 2010, 05:46 PM

    If we're comparing equals, then yes. For example, an average guy would be physically stronger than an average girl, an average male bodybuilder stronger than an average female bodybuilder, etc.
    Actually a lot of guys are called little boys, gimps, etc. Obviously calling them a name of a disease would be offensive to the people who have that disease, and then there would be massive campaigns against that. But they do get called a lot of names that don't have anything to do with women.
    A bitch actually means a female dog more than a human female. Female dogs are often submissive and seen whimpering.

    All of your examples assume any form of weakness or lack of physical prowess are negative traits in men, and that male perfection lies in strength without any obvious signs of weakness. Men who fail to live up to these expectations might turn to show a lack of compassion for others, belittle those physically weaker than themselves to boost their ego, turn to steroids... do any of these things sound like problems that affect quite a few men in our society? We can be just as much victims of sexist culture as women. Just like idealised conceptions of beauty forced upon women by the media create generations of girls with eating disorders. We don't have to accept recieved ideals for our gender, we don't have to conform to stereotypes. Both genders can choose to be free of these illusionary models of perfection, be ourselves and be happy without having to put other people down.

    Each of us a failed state in stark relief against the backdrop of the perfect worlds we seek.
    Propagandhi - Failed States
  • Re: Women
     Reply #359 - April 10, 2010, 05:48 PM

    +1 ^^   Afro

    Those stereotypes need to be done away with.

    Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit.
  • Previous page 1 ... 10 11 1213 14 15 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »