Sorry, I always seem to confuse people regarding this. I accept evolution as fact - what I'm saying is that current thinking is that evolution theory is the sole mechanism that can explain all that we are - this may be true, but currently, the scientific data to support such a claim does not yet exist. For example, as I mentioned issues such as the evolution of conciousness have yet to be addressed in a satisfactory manner. I also question whether the group survival model can account for the range of human emotions that we posess. In addition detailed step by step molecular accounts of how complex cellular pathways evolved is currently lacking. Evolutionary biologists will probably (one hopes at least) have better descriptions one day, but until then we should be open to the fact that there may be other mechanisms, which of course may well be and probably are scientific, that are involved that modify or complement our current theory in order that these things are more easily explained scientifically.
I think a lot of people misunderstand what the theory of evolution actually is, what it claims to prove or explain, or what the scientific field it belongs to is actually working on. Its important to clarify what we actually mean when we say 'evolution', in particular if we mean simply general 'change over time' applicable to many different fields, or if we specifically mean the current scientific model of understanding about
biological diversty, a.k.a, the theory of evolution.
Here's a quick run-down of some clarifications:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3k0dDFxkhM