Doesn't matter if you call it 'collateral damage' or 'unintentional murder' or whatever. The responsibility for deaths of civilians still lies on the side of those who bombed them.
There's a big difference between unintentionally killed civilians as in the case of drone strikes and intentially targeted civilians as in case of suicide attacks by terrorists.
How would you like it if your loved ones got killed by a drone and some American asshole would claim that their deaths are unfortunate but they weren't really the target but merely colatteral damage?
The only person I would blame is the terrorist who was the actual target of the drone strike which killed my family instead. Unless the Americans had intentionally targeted my family I wouldn't blame them. They are only acting in self defense, to protect their own civilians.
I would seek out the person who was the actual target of the strike, and kill him.
You can't be serious donatelo.
Are you saying that they are guilty simply because they happen to live in a certain location?
I mean seriously man ...
facepalm.jpg
FATA is not just any location mate, it is
the hotbed of terrorism, most terrorist attacks done by islamists are planned in that area.
When you live in an area
that involved in terrorist activity, you
have to have some support for them for you to continue living in that area, or allowing those people to live in your city. And also, drone strikes have been going on for several years now, all 'true' civilians have had plenty of time to leave that area, and many have done so.