Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
February 17, 2025, 11:51 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 15, 2025, 04:00 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: WHO MADE THE WORLD

 (Read 24755 times)
  • 12 3 ... 6 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • WHO MADE THE WORLD
     OP - April 15, 2011, 02:51 PM

    if you believe there is no god then who made the world
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #1 - April 15, 2011, 03:00 PM


    Josef Fritzl


    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #2 - April 15, 2011, 03:13 PM

    i know u have no answer
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #3 - April 15, 2011, 03:17 PM

    Saeed, who made Allah?
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #4 - April 15, 2011, 03:21 PM

    only allah knows where he comes from
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #5 - April 15, 2011, 03:22 PM

    It is not known with certainty how planets are formed. The prevailing theory is that they are formed during the collapse of a nebula into a thin disk of gas and dust. A protostar forms at the core, surrounded by a rotating protoplanetary disk. Through accretion (a process of sticky collision) dust particles in the disk steadily accumulate mass to form ever-larger bodies. Local concentrations of mass known as planetesimals form, and these accelerate the accretion process by drawing in additional material by their gravitational attraction. These concentrations become ever denser until they collapse inward under gravity to form protoplanets. After a planet reaches a diameter larger than the Earth's moon, it begins to accumulate an extended atmosphere, greatly increasing the capture rate of the planetesimals by means of atmospheric drag.

    An artist's impression of protoplanetary disk:


    When the protostar has grown such that it ignites to form a star, the surviving disk is removed from the inside outward by photoevaporation, the solar wind, Poynting-Robertson drag and other effects. Thereafter there still may be many protoplanets orbiting the star or each other, but over time many will collide, either to form a single larger planet or release material for other larger protoplanets or planets to absorb. Those objects that have become massive enough will capture most matter in their orbital neighbourhoods to become planets. Meanwhile, protoplanets that have avoided collisions may become natural satellites of planets through a process of gravitational capture, or remain in belts of other objects to become either dwarf planets or small bodies.

    The energetic impacts of the smaller planetesimals (as well as radioactive decay) will heat up the growing planet, causing it to at least partially melt. The interior of the planet begins to differentiate by mass, developing a denser core. Smaller terrestrial planets lose most of their atmospheres because of this accretion, but the lost gases can be replaced by outgassing from the mantle and from the subsequent impact of comets. (Smaller planets will lose any atmosphere they gain through various escape mechanisms.)

    With the discovery and observation of planetary systems around stars other than our own, it is becoming possible to elaborate, revise or even replace this account. The level of metallicity – an astronomical term describing the abundance of chemical elements with an atomic number greater than 2 (helium) – is now believed to determine the likelihood that a star will have planets. Hence, it is thought that a metal-rich population I star will likely possess a more substantial planetary system than a metal-poor, population II star.

    The Nebular Hypothesis

    The Nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System. There is evidence that it was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg. Originally applied only to our own Solar System, this method of planetary system formation is now thought to be at work throughout the universe. The widely accepted modern variant of the nebular hypothesis is Solar Nebular Disk Model (SNDM) or simply Solar Nebular Model.

    According to SNDM stars form in massive and dense clouds of molecular hydrogen—giant molecular clouds (GMC). They are gravitationally unstable, and matter coalesces to smaller denser clumps within, which then proceed to collapse and form stars. Star formation is a complex process, which always produces a gaseous protoplanetary disk around the young star. This may give birth to planets in certain circumstances, which are not well known. Thus the formation of planetary systems is thought to be a natural result of star formation. A sun-like star usually takes around 100 million years to form.

    The protoplanetary disk is an accretion disk which continues to feed the central star. Initially very hot, the disk later cools in what is known as the T tauri star stage; here, formation of small dust grains made of rocks and ices is possible. The grains may eventually coagulate into kilometer sized planetesimals. If the disk is massive enough the runaway accretions begin, resulting in the rapid—100,000 to 300,000 years—formation of Moon- to Mars-sized planetary embryos. Near the star, the planetary embryos go through a stage of violent mergers, producing a few terrestrial planets. The last stage takes around 100 million to a billion years.

    The formation of giant planets is a more complicated process. It is thought to occur beyond the so called snow line, where planetary embryos are mainly made of various ices. As a result they are several times more massive than in the inner part of the protoplanetary disk. What follows after the embryo formation is not completely clear. However, some embryos appear to continue to grow and eventually reach 5–10 Earth masses—the threshold value, which is necessary to begin accretion of the hydrogen–helium gas from the disk. The accumulation of gas by the core is initially a slow process, which continues for several million years, but after the forming protoplanet reaches about 30 Earth masses it accelerates and proceeds in a runaway manner. The Jupiter and Saturn–like planets are thought to accumulate the bulk of their mass during only 10,000 years. The accretion stops when the gas is exhausted. The formed planets can migrate over long distances during or after their formation. The ice giants like Uranus and Neptune are thought to be failed cores, which formed too late when the disk had almost disappeared.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #6 - April 15, 2011, 03:23 PM

    Well, im satisfied with the "i dont know."

    Besides... whats up witht he caps titles? Its like you try to be some kind of super troll.

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #7 - April 15, 2011, 03:23 PM

    How do we know that Allah knows where he came from? Did he wake up one day and suggested that he should choose the Jews as his chosen ones, then he got angry and expelled them, then he choose Christians as his own, then he got upset and expelled them and now out of all the people he chooses a Pedophile psychopath who decides to hate everyone on the planet and has sex with a 9 year old girl, even though he couldnt read or write, a invisible angel told him messages from a invisbile Arabian Moon god.

    Dude, Iam sorry,but I am not convinced.

    Islam is the no different than the usual mumbo jumbo from that era.
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #8 - April 15, 2011, 03:23 PM

    i know u have no answer


    Josef Fritzl, I told you.

    If not him, then Charles Darwin.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #9 - April 15, 2011, 03:24 PM

    Why couldnt Allah choose a Secular Minded Malaysian to lead mankind to peace?
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #10 - April 15, 2011, 03:26 PM

    It is not known with certainty how planets are formed. The prevailing theory is that they are formed during the collapse of a nebula into a thin disk of gas and dust. A protostar forms at the core, surrounded by a rotating protoplanetary disk. Through accretion (a process of sticky collision) dust particles in the disk steadily accumulate mass to form ever-larger bodies. Local concentrations of mass known as planetesimals form, and these accelerate the accretion process by drawing in additional material by their gravitational attraction. These concentrations become ever denser until they collapse inward under gravity to form protoplanets. After a planet reaches a diameter larger than the Earth's moon, it begins to accumulate an extended atmosphere, greatly increasing the capture rate of the planetesimals by means of atmospheric drag.

    An artist's impression of protoplanetary disk:
    (Clicky for piccy!)

    When the protostar has grown such that it ignites to form a star, the surviving disk is removed from the inside outward by photoevaporation, the solar wind, Poynting-Robertson drag and other effects. Thereafter there still may be many protoplanets orbiting the star or each other, but over time many will collide, either to form a single larger planet or release material for other larger protoplanets or planets to absorb. Those objects that have become massive enough will capture most matter in their orbital neighbourhoods to become planets. Meanwhile, protoplanets that have avoided collisions may become natural satellites of planets through a process of gravitational capture, or remain in belts of other objects to become either dwarf planets or small bodies.

    The energetic impacts of the smaller planetesimals (as well as radioactive decay) will heat up the growing planet, causing it to at least partially melt. The interior of the planet begins to differentiate by mass, developing a denser core. Smaller terrestrial planets lose most of their atmospheres because of this accretion, but the lost gases can be replaced by outgassing from the mantle and from the subsequent impact of comets. (Smaller planets will lose any atmosphere they gain through various escape mechanisms.)

    With the discovery and observation of planetary systems around stars other than our own, it is becoming possible to elaborate, revise or even replace this account. The level of metallicity – an astronomical term describing the abundance of chemical elements with an atomic number greater than 2 (helium) – is now believed to determine the likelihood that a star will have planets. Hence, it is thought that a metal-rich population I star will likely possess a more substantial planetary system than a metal-poor, population II star.

    The Nebular Hypothesis

    The Nebular hypothesis is the most widely accepted model explaining the formation and evolution of the Solar System. There is evidence that it was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg. Originally applied only to our own Solar System, this method of planetary system formation is now thought to be at work throughout the universe. The widely accepted modern variant of the nebular hypothesis is Solar Nebular Disk Model (SNDM) or simply Solar Nebular Model.

    According to SNDM stars form in massive and dense clouds of molecular hydrogen—giant molecular clouds (GMC). They are gravitationally unstable, and matter coalesces to smaller denser clumps within, which then proceed to collapse and form stars. Star formation is a complex process, which always produces a gaseous protoplanetary disk around the young star. This may give birth to planets in certain circumstances, which are not well known. Thus the formation of planetary systems is thought to be a natural result of star formation. A sun-like star usually takes around 100 million years to form.

    The protoplanetary disk is an accretion disk which continues to feed the central star. Initially very hot, the disk later cools in what is known as the T tauri star stage; here, formation of small dust grains made of rocks and ices is possible. The grains may eventually coagulate into kilometer sized planetesimals. If the disk is massive enough the runaway accretions begin, resulting in the rapid—100,000 to 300,000 years—formation of Moon- to Mars-sized planetary embryos. Near the star, the planetary embryos go through a stage of violent mergers, producing a few terrestrial planets. The last stage takes around 100 million to a billion years.

    The formation of giant planets is a more complicated process. It is thought to occur beyond the so called snow line, where planetary embryos are mainly made of various ices. As a result they are several times more massive than in the inner part of the protoplanetary disk. What follows after the embryo formation is not completely clear. However, some embryos appear to continue to grow and eventually reach 5–10 Earth masses—the threshold value, which is necessary to begin accretion of the hydrogen–helium gas from the disk. The accumulation of gas by the core is initially a slow process, which continues for several million years, but after the forming protoplanet reaches about 30 Earth masses it accelerates and proceeds in a runaway manner. The Jupiter and Saturn–like planets are thought to accumulate the bulk of their mass during only 10,000 years. The accretion stops when the gas is exhausted. The formed planets can migrate over long distances during or after their formation. The ice giants like Uranus and Neptune are thought to be failed cores, which formed too late when the disk had almost disappeared.

    this is simple now,if someone has the right answer he can say it in 2 lines,if someone doesnt then he writes 100000000000000000000 lines like this which basically say bla bla bla but in the end answer is we have no answer,muslims only say allah made it,they answer in 3 words u write 10000000000000 lines but still no answer
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #11 - April 15, 2011, 03:27 PM


    Quote
    this is simple now,if someone has the right answer he can say it in 2 lines,if someone doesnt then he writes 100000000000000000000 lines like this which basically say bla bla bla but in the end answer is we have no answer,muslims only say allah made it,this shows who has right answer


    So, basecly you say, if the awnser isnt simple enough for me to understand it, its bullshit?

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #12 - April 15, 2011, 03:29 PM

    Well, im satisfied with the "i dont know."

    Besides... whats up witht he caps titles? Its like you try to be some kind of super troll.

    u r brianwash if u r satisfied with i dont know,no one can ever be satisfied with this
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #13 - April 15, 2011, 03:30 PM

    Saeed
    You are brainwashed! You think Allah made this universe? with what? you really think mankind is made from Clay? Where do you get these non-sense from?
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #14 - April 15, 2011, 03:30 PM

    So, basecly you say, if the awnser isnt simple enough for me to understand it, its bullshit?

    no,it means,she wrote a lot of nonsence but actually she doesnt know the answer,true answer is aways short and simple
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #15 - April 15, 2011, 03:30 PM

    Quote
    u r brianwash if u r satisfied with i dont know,no one can ever be satisfied with this


    thanks for ruining my keybaord... i just spewed my coke all over it because i laughed so hard.

    Who thought today would be the day a muslim told me I AM the one whos brainwashed.

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #16 - April 15, 2011, 03:31 PM

    Saeed
    You are brainwashed! You think Allah made this universe? with what? you really think mankind is made from Clay? Where do you get these non-sense from?

    allah can make from anything if he is powerful enough to make the whole world,what do u think darwin made humans from monkeys?where do u get these nonsence from? Cheesy
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #17 - April 15, 2011, 03:32 PM

    Quote
    no,it means,she wrote a lot of nonsence but actually she doesnt know the answer,true answer is aways short and simple


    Truth is never simple... as soon as you understand that, you will begin your journey to ratonality.

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #18 - April 15, 2011, 03:32 PM

    this is simple now,if someone has the right answer he can say it in 2 lines

    I can answer your irritatingly simple-minded question in one word: Nobody.

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #19 - April 15, 2011, 03:33 PM

    thanks for ruining my keybaord... i just spewed my coke all over it because i laughed so hard.

    Who thought today would be the day a muslim told me I AM the one whos brainwashed.

    if u r satisfied with i dont know,means u r brianwash
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #20 - April 15, 2011, 03:34 PM

    Quote
    if u r satisfied with i dont know,means u r brianwash


    really, i cant argue with that... you convinced me, the koran is true... im a muslim now... happy?

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #21 - April 15, 2011, 03:34 PM

    I can answer your irritatingly simple-minded question in one word: Nobody.

    what!!!!!then why isnt there new worlds coming around every day?Huh?Huh???
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #22 - April 15, 2011, 03:35 PM

    really, i cant argue with that... you convinced me, the koran is true... im a muslim now... happy?


    will you take the shahada?
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #23 - April 15, 2011, 03:36 PM

    Quote
    what!!!!!then why isnt there new worlds coming around every day?Huh?Huh???


    Who says there arent? The universe is freakishly big place, you know?

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #24 - April 15, 2011, 03:36 PM

    Yea...

    Shahada

    Happy?

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #25 - April 15, 2011, 03:37 PM

    u have to take in mosque properly
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #26 - April 15, 2011, 03:38 PM

    only allah knows where he comes from


    why is he so secretive ? because its absolute bullshit

    "its fashionable to be an ex Muslim these days"
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #27 - April 15, 2011, 03:39 PM

    How do we know that Allah knows where he came from? Did he wake up one day and suggested that he should choose the Jews as his chosen ones, then he got angry and expelled them, then he choose Christians as his own, then he got upset and expelled them and now out of all the people he chooses a Pedophile psychopath who decides to hate everyone on the planet and has sex with a 9 year old girl, even though he couldnt read or write, a invisible angel told him messages from a invisbile Arabian Moon god.

    Dude, Iam sorry,but I am not convinced.

    Islam is the no different than the usual mumbo jumbo from that era.

    because no one else knows except allah,do u know who my parents are if i dont tell u?only i know that unless i tell people,same way only allah knows where he comes from,if u dont beleive in allah then who made the world???
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #28 - April 15, 2011, 03:39 PM

    just went to an online mosque and took it... now i am a muslim.. Alhammdullalaah

    "We are never deceived, we deceive ourselves." - from Goethes Faust
    "Only the wisest and the stupidest men never change." - Confuzios
    "there is no religion of peace, only people who are peaceful while being religious."
  • Re: WHO MADE THE WORLD
     Reply #29 - April 15, 2011, 03:39 PM

    why is he so secretive ? because its absolute bullshit

    why should he tell everyone his private things??
  • 12 3 ... 6 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »