Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Berlin car crasher
by zeca
Yesterday at 11:10 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
Yesterday at 07:30 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
December 20, 2024, 12:15 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
December 19, 2024, 10:26 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 17, 2024, 07:04 PM

News From Syria
December 15, 2024, 01:02 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
December 11, 2024, 01:25 PM

New Britain
December 08, 2024, 10:30 AM

Ashes to beads: South Kor...
December 03, 2024, 09:44 PM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland

 (Read 7844 times)
  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     OP - April 03, 2012, 03:43 PM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR7U42wf7zY
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #1 - April 03, 2012, 05:30 PM

    Fuck, Just watching this, he says he had request from women in the west for stoning, bloody hell
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #2 - April 03, 2012, 07:20 PM

    that guy is an idjut!

    sure wish there was the rest of the debate up somewhere.

    Actually Doc Z, I knew a saudi sister living in canada who
    said she would request to be whipped if she felt she did something
    to warrant it under shariah law.  Claiming that would keep her
    from going to hell, and go to jannah instead.  wacko

    When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us.
    Helen Keller
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #3 - April 03, 2012, 09:25 PM

    They were trying to straw man the Shaik in the beginning by telling him he is imposing stuff, he clearly said he is not imposing anything, he is just suggesting that wearing a Burqa is the right way but it is up to u, till here the Shaik is winning.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #4 - April 03, 2012, 09:49 PM

    but.... is he ALSO saying that not wearing a burkha is a whippable offense?
    And WHAT women request to be whipped?  Why?  (outside of the one
    muslimah i wrote about above)

    When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us.
    Helen Keller
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #5 - April 03, 2012, 09:50 PM

    I still want to know why women in saudi have to wear full gear.  I mean
    they state its for their protection, but who are they being protected
    FROM?  HMMM?  other saudi muslim men, thats who!

     finmad

    When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us.
    Helen Keller
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #6 - April 03, 2012, 10:01 PM

    A potent mix of bedouin culture of female posession and codified radical Islam I suppose.

    "Nobody who lived through the '50s thought the '60s could've existed. So there's always hope."-Tuli Kupferberg

    What apple stores are like.....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8QmZWv-eBI
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #7 - April 03, 2012, 10:11 PM


    A caveman primitive in a modern world.


    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #8 - April 03, 2012, 11:23 PM

    but.... is he ALSO saying that not wearing a burkha is a whippable offense?
    And WHAT women request to be whipped?  Why?  (outside of the one
    muslimah i wrote about above)


    now I will watch the rest of the Debate, I am on minute 41, till now the Shaik is winning, they are desperately trying to straw man him.

    He also stated that certain rules apply only to Muslims, he never said that he would punish anyone by whipping, he just said that his job is simply to tell people what is the right way to follow Islam and he said if a woman goes and asks him if she should wear Burqa then he will tell her that she will but if she doesn't want to then it is up to her, he also stated that he doesn't agree with Saudi Arabia and Iran.

    Also the argument made by that lady who joined the table that who is he to talk about her rights was invalid, why shouldn't we talk about people's rights Huh? He is not imposing it.

    His claims are clear and he is saying that stoning and Burqa is for the people that accept that kind of punishment as normal and it applies to them, he even said that if he committed adultery he would have asked to get stoned, maybe he is lying but his argument is valid also he is making a parallel between the death punishment in the West for treason and apostasy and also a good parallel between imposing laws like don't park here and the Burqa even though he made it totally clear that he is not imposing anything on anyone, he is simply suggesting. 

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #9 - April 03, 2012, 11:51 PM

    Quote
    also he is making a parallel between the death punishment in the West for treason and apostasy and also a good parallel between imposing laws like don't park here and the Burqa even though he made it totally clear that he is not imposing anything on anyone, he is simply suggesting


    In other words, typical primitive sophistry from a dawahgandist bullshit snake oil salesman.

    Those arguments are 'parallel' if freedom of conscience was the same as treason (and its a false comparison in every dimension - one is ubiquitous the other isn't) and if the attire of a woman and a woman herself is the equivalent of parking a car in a street - ie: you accept the misogynistic dehumanisation of that premise to begin with.

    These are straw men and they come from the primitive caveman.


    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #10 - April 03, 2012, 11:56 PM

    @ billy:

    Why are you saying that Huh? I think he was very honest and made very good points about what he was saying.

    I would agree that treason and freedom of consciousness is not the same and you can't draw a parallel but still if someone consciously accepted those kinds of rules and he knew that one day if he had to apostate he will have to face a death punishment then what is it all about, I think that person signed his own death warrant, just like in a normal society where you are given a death punishment for treason, no one asked u if u agree with that law or if u like it, they will just put u in front of the firing squad and execute you, it is the same with apostasy.

    He kept repeating that these laws don't apply to people who are not muslims only to people who want to accept this way of life and that is pretty valid, I mean if u want to get hanged or get ur hand cut off for stealing then who am I to tell u not to do so ??

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #11 - April 03, 2012, 11:58 PM

    His points are shite mate, typical dawah-ganda snake oil.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #12 - April 04, 2012, 12:02 AM

    I modified my post after realizing that you had added a couple of more details in your own post, check it again if you feel like it is worth reading.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #13 - April 04, 2012, 12:16 AM

    Quote
    maybe he is lying but his argument is valid also he is making a parallel between the death punishment in the West for treason and apostas

     

     Only a totalitarian regime would execute someone for holding  a certain opinion.

    Any muslim who says infront of me that ex muslims should be executed would get punched in the face.

    In my opinion a life without curiosity is not a life worth living
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #14 - April 04, 2012, 12:18 AM

    but still if someone consciously accepted those kinds of rules and he knew that one day if he had to apostate he will have to face a death punishment then what is it all about


    Its snake oil because in the real world it doesn't work like that - it works by forces of totalising unquestionable forces in societies that coerce, and enforce on submission without question.

    Who with a free conscience assents to being killed for their free conscience just because they were born into a society that embodied that value?

    I see the face of this man and I see the face of a wicked spirit snuffing all light out from humanity if he was given one wish.

    Vile, repulsive, snake oil peddling primitive dawah-ganda peddling cowardly creep.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #15 - April 04, 2012, 12:28 AM

    maybe he is lying but his argument is valid also he is making a parallel between the death punishment in the West for treason and apostasy


    Never heard of this guy nor have I watched the video but if he states that then he's distinguishing  between "political apostasy" (like the ridda wars) and "religious apostasy". If so, its quite a valid argument that mainstream Islamic jurists used centuries ago.

    Quote
    The Prophet (pbuh) never put anyone to death for apostasy alone rather he let such person go unharmed. No one was sentenced to death solely for renunciation of faith unless accompanied by hostility and treason or was linked to an act of political betrayal of the community. As a matter of fact the Quran is completely silent on the question of death as a punishment for apostasy.....

    Mohammad Hashim  Kamali put forwarded verse 137 of Chapter 4 (Surat An Nisa) as conclusive proof of argument against the death penalty for apostasy:: “Those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe again, then disbelieve and then increase in their disbelief – God will never forgive them nor guide them to the path”. Commenting on the verse Mohammad Hashim Kamali pointed out: “The implication is unmistakable. The text would hardly entertain the prospect of repeated belief and disbelief if death were to be the prescribed punishment for the initial act....

    Mohammad Hashim Kamali pointed out to the hadith, the Saying of the Prophet (saws) which “makes it clear that the apostate must also boycott the community (muifariq lil-jamaah) and challenge its legitimate leadership, in order to be subjected to death penalty”3: “The blood of a Muslim who professes  that there is no god but Allah and that I am His Messenger, is sacrosanct except in three cases: a married adulterer; a person who has killed another human being; and a person who has abandoned his religion, while splitting himself off from the community (muifariq lil-jamaah)”4.

    Imam Ibn Taymiyyah explaining the aforementioned hadith of the Prophet (pbuh) inferred that “the crime referred to in the hadith under discussion is that of high treason (hirabah) and not apostasy (riddah) as such”5.


    There's more but I cba copy+pasting. Here's the link:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080525113503/http://www.islamonline.net/english/Contemporary/2003/05/Article01a.shtml
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #16 - April 04, 2012, 12:42 AM

     

     Only a totalitarian regime would execute someone for holding  a certain opinion.

    Any muslim who says infront of me that ex muslims should be executed would get punched in the face.


    I can totally relate to that but that Shaik whatever his name was said that he didn't agree with totalitarian regimes such as the Saudi and Iranian one and he said that he wants to promulgate that kind of law such as Sheria amongst people who want to live in that kind of law and he clearly said that he would invoke stoning upon himself.

    @ Billy:

    Quote
    Who with a free conscience assents to being killed for their free conscience just because they were born into a society that embodied that value?


    The Shaik himself and many other obviously Brainwashed people like someone stated in this topic that some woman had summoned to be stoned for certain sins they had perpetrated or whatever.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #17 - April 04, 2012, 12:47 AM

    Fuck, Just watching this, he says he had request from women in the west for stoning, bloody hell

    well .,   there are women on this  earth who are on drugs, who want to get dominated, want to be taken. so what is wrong if few of them want to get stoned? or at least they want to see some one get stoned??  

    There are plenty of stupid people on this earth who defend a 53 year old man sleeping with 9 year old children for one reason or other including angels in dream told him to get married to 6 year olds so he can sleep with her when that child is nine..

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #18 - April 04, 2012, 12:48 AM

    Never heard of this guy nor have I watched the video but if he states that then he's distinguishing  between "political apostasy" (like the ridda wars) and "religious apostasy". If so, its quite a valid argument that mainstream Islamic jurists used centuries ago.

    There's more but I cba copy+pasting. Here's the link:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080525113503/http://www.islamonline.net/english/Contemporary/2003/05/Article01a.shtml


    So basically you won't be put to death solely for disbelieving, now I get it why he was saying that it depends on the circumstances.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #19 - April 04, 2012, 01:06 AM

    @ Billy:

    The Shaik himself and many other obviously Brainwashed people like someone stated in this topic that some woman had summoned to be stoned for certain sins they had perpetrated or whatever.


    Vindicated by something as perverse as that! Imagine having that as your trump card in an argument, and playing it, and thinking that the stares of disbelief at the inhumanity and horror are in fact, stunned faces of awe. We live in different dimensions.

    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #20 - April 04, 2012, 01:13 AM

    So basically you won't be put to death solely for disbelieving, now I get it why he was saying that it depends on the circumstances.


    That's how I always saw it when I was going through my idealistic Islamist phase. I still think there's some truth in it. I mean Muhammad never put anyone to death simply because they stopped believing and when Abu Bakr launched the ridda wars I think he was thinking "damn that's some revenue lost" and not "OMG they're denying the charity that is made fard by Allah".
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #21 - April 04, 2012, 01:19 AM

    That's how I always saw it when I was going through my idealistic Islamist phase. I still think there's some truth in it. I mean Muhammad never put anyone to death simply because they stopped believing and when Abu Bakr launched the ridda wars I think he was thinking "damn that's some revenue lost" and not "OMG they're denying the charity that is made fard by Allah".


    Hmm now in your other idealistic   phase  you are like this orange girl..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hKEd6rzbeg

    And a juicy  guy under that video says

    Quote
    you people deserve this, now you know what Israel is going through and the people they are dealing with

    wake up this is a war between religions and they wouldn't stop till they take over the world and how? by having more babies than us!!


     Yes... having more babies  Hmm..... will selective sex abortion help you??/

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #22 - April 04, 2012, 01:25 AM

    She didn't get violent, so we're not alike.  Tongue
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #23 - April 04, 2012, 01:52 AM

    That's how I always saw it when I was going through my idealistic Islamist phase. I still think there's some truth in it. I mean Muhammad never put anyone to death simply because they stopped believing and when Abu Bakr launched the ridda wars I think he was thinking "damn that's some revenue lost" and not "OMG they're denying the charity that is made fard by Allah".


    it wouldn't be a problem even if Muhammed executed someone for apostasy because he was a human being and human beings are fallible but what befuddles me is how God won't forgive someone for disbelieving.

    I am not sure I understand the Abu Bakr instance though.

    Anyways, the Salafi owned those guys, those guys didn't have any argument to be honest, the Salafi answered all their questions with such an imperturbability

  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #24 - April 04, 2012, 02:29 AM

    There they are in a free western country, and when that one guy
    on the microphone said he was an ex muslim, did you not hear
    the jeers and "KUFFAR!" shrilled in absolute disgust?  I would have
    sued her ass for discrimination, and slapped that bitch!

    When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened for us.
    Helen Keller
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #25 - April 04, 2012, 02:39 AM

    @sturmgewehr

    owned ? calm and collected? eh , did you watch the whole vid?

    when ehsan jami asked him questions, he looked baffled and confused, before replying "i dont know, im sorry i cant answer that question'
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #26 - April 04, 2012, 03:45 AM

    Hmm now in your other idealistic   phase  you are like this orange girl..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hKEd6rzbeg

    And a juicy  guy under that video says

     Yes... having more babies  Hmm..... will selective sex abortion help you??/



    Man I'd love to troll these protests.  

    "You're going to hell"

    " I'm from Texas and no one goes to hell twice"

    I'd like to see Aphrodite drop some 'bows on a bitch once and a while though.  

    Those retards are pretty smart though.  The best defense is the best offence and instead of actually answering any questions they start throwing out insults and putting the other person on the defensive.  The Westboro Baptist Church is the best at that.  

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #27 - April 04, 2012, 04:33 AM

    Quote
    The Westboro Baptist Church is the best at that. 

       

    Heres an idea. Let's take these people from the protests and the people from the Westboro Baptist Church and lock them into one big room together.

    No more extremists will be left.  Afro

    In my opinion a life without curiosity is not a life worth living
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #28 - April 04, 2012, 05:32 AM

    A caveman primitive in a modern world.




    He fails in the first 20 seconds.  No non Muslim can say what Islam is? lol what? There are whole departments in universities dedicated to teaching what Islam is and isn't and not all of them are Muslims.  Apply that to anything else.  American drone strikes in Yemen.  Are those bad? Who knows?  Youre not American or living in Yemen so you can't say what it is or isn't, so STFU. See? It's easy to stifle discussion when you say only a select few individuals are "given permission" to discuss a topic.  

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Radical extremist Haitham Al-Haddad debate in holland
     Reply #29 - April 04, 2012, 10:52 AM

    Anyways, the Salafi owned those guys


     Grin


    "we can smell traitors and country haters"


    God is Love.
    Love is Blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

  • 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »