Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → Life, The Universe & Everything → Religions and Gods → Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

Gaza assault
Today at 09:25 AM
New Britain
Yesterday at 08:11 PM
Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 03:50 AM
اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM
What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM
Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM
German nationalist party ...
February 21, 2025, 10:31 AM
Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM
Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM
Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM
Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM
Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani

 (Read 13374 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #30 - April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:54 PM
    But the hadith is not part of Islam, it was a man invention sinilar to the books of NT that corrupted the chrsitian belief, same with the Muslims, Jerry Springer books of hadith corrupted their religion,  but hey, the bottom line is this, the Quran is the only uncorrupted scripture, that should say it all

    Still, Muslims seem confused about such Ahadith. There is much disagreement.

    Which old copy of the Quran do you use as reference to determine that the one you are reading has not been corrupted, by the way?
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #31 - April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 09:57 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:54 PM
    the Quran is the only uncorrupted scripture, that should say it all

    It might "say it all", if you had any evidence whatsoever to back that particular assertion.



    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha

    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #32 - April 15, 2009, 10:01 PM
    Quote from: Tlaloc on April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:54 PM
    But the hadith is not part of Islam, it was a man invention sinilar to the books of NT that corrupted the chrsitian belief, same with the Muslims, Jerry Springer books of hadith corrupted their religion,  but hey, the bottom line is this, the Quran is the only uncorrupted scripture, that should say it all

    Still, Muslims seem confused about such Ahadith. There is much disagreement.

    Which old copy of the Quran do you use as reference to determine that the one you are reading has not been corrupted, by the way?


    The Muslims who believe in the books of hadith are certainly confused as well polythiests, therefore they have to be confused about such rubbish that is called hadith, no surprises
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #33 - April 15, 2009, 10:02 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha

    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE

    I think he is indeed giving it the benefit of doubt.
    Hence why he cannot claim that the Quran is not corrupted.
    You were the one claiming such thing without benefit of doubt
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #34 - April 15, 2009, 10:03 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:01 PM
    The Muslims who believe in the books of hadith are certainly confused as well polythiests, therefore they have to be confused about such rubbish that is called hadith, no surprises

    I see.

    So the "not confused" Muslims are really few, correct?
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #35 - April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #36 - April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote from: Tlaloc on April 15, 2009, 10:03 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:01 PM
    The Muslims who believe in the books of hadith are certainly confused as well polythiests, therefore they have to be confused about such rubbish that is called hadith, no surprises

    I see.

    So the "not confused" Muslims are really few, correct?



    Exactly, and that is confirmed by the Quran
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #37 - April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 09:57 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:54 PM
    the Quran is the only uncorrupted scripture, that should say it all

    It might "say it all", if you had any evidence whatsoever to back that particular assertion.



    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha

    Not at all. You are asserting that the Quran is uncorrupted. The default position is not that the Quran is automatically true.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #38 - April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #39 - April 15, 2009, 10:07 PM
    Quote
    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself


    Even if I accept that Mohammed was illiterate, (although you have shown no evidence for it), that doesn't mean he couldn't make up the Qur'an.  All it means is that he would have had to dictate the stuff he made up to someone who could write it down.
    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #40 - April 15, 2009, 10:08 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    He did not mention writing. He mentioned "making up".

    Homer could not read nor write either, but he supposedly made up the Iliad.
    (and that is proof that the Iliad is a miracle, cause it was composed by a blind guy who could not read nor write :O)
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #41 - April 15, 2009, 10:09 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 09:57 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:54 PM
    the Quran is the only uncorrupted scripture, that should say it all

    It might "say it all", if you had any evidence whatsoever to back that particular assertion.



    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha

    Not at all. You are asserting that the Quran is uncorrupted. The default position is not that the Quran is automatically true.


    Not only me who assrets that, but many of the kafirs as well, read this and educate yourself a bit

    Sir William Muir, a well-known critic of Islam, wrote in his book The Life of Mohamet:

    There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries with so pure a text

    and since Sir William Muir, wrote this another 225 years have rolled by and the truth has remained unchanged and pure as it was from day one of its complete revelation.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #42 - April 15, 2009, 10:10 PM
    Quote from: Tlaloc on April 15, 2009, 10:08 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    He did not mention writing. He mentioned "making up".

    Homer could not read nor write either, but he supposedly made up the Iliad.
    (and that is proof that the Iliad is a miracle, cause it was composed by a blind guy who could not read nor write :O)



    Ok, I see, so he brought up some raw material then cooked it together to make the Quran

    why don't you dismiss yourself? It will better for you
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #43 - April 15, 2009, 10:12 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:09 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:59 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 09:57 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 09:54 PM
    the Quran is the only uncorrupted scripture, that should say it all

    It might "say it all", if you had any evidence whatsoever to back that particular assertion.



    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha

    Not at all. You are asserting that the Quran is uncorrupted. The default position is not that the Quran is automatically true.


    Not only me who assrets that, but many of the kafirs as well, read this and educate yourself a bit

    Sir William Muir, a well-known critic of Islam, wrote in his book The Life of Mohamet:

    There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries with so pure a text

    and since Sir William Muir, wrote this another 225 years have rolled by and the truth has remained unchanged and pure as it was from day one of its complete revelation.


    That doesn't mean much. The bible has also remained much the same for twelve centuries.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #44 - April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote
    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself


    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:07 PM
    Even if I accept that Mohammed was illiterate,


    Not even, YOU HAVE TO

    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:07 PM
    (although you have shown no evidence for it), that doesn't mean he couldn't make up the Qur'an.  All it means is that he would have had to dictate the stuff he made up to someone who could write it down.


    The Bible and the Quran proved that Mohammed didnot know how to read, nor in the history records, your wishful thinking is proved, see your wishful thinking that someone elese wrote it and gave it to Mohammed, makes abolutely no sense, see, why that man write something so great, and give it to someone else to claim its glory

    I think you need to join te aother dismissal, in the dismissal room
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #45 - April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    Ahmed, give it up on the gratuitous insults whenever somebody disagrees with you.
    We've been over this before and we don't have infinite tolerance.

    Smite 1 for you. Two left before you're off to Damnation. Have a nice day.     parrot
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #46 - April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:09 PM
    Not only me who assrets that, but many of the kafirs as well, read this and educate yourself a bit

    Sir William Muir, a well-known critic of Islam, wrote in his book The Life of Mohamet:

    There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries with so pure a text

    and since Sir William Muir, wrote this another 225 years have rolled by and the truth has remained unchanged and pure as it was from day one of its complete revelation.

    Did he ignore the massive amount of Greek and Latin literature that we still have from 2000+ years ago, among other things?

    Such a claim sounds... uhmmm... quite imprecise at least lol
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #47 - April 15, 2009, 10:16 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    Ahmed, give it up on the gratuitous insults whenever somebody disagrees with you.
    We've been over this before and we don't have infinite tolerance.

    Smite 1 for you. Two left before you're off to Damnation. Have a nice day.     parrot


    Mister confused and control freak

    calling someone confused and ignroant is not an insult, this is how I see them as I see you too, you are damn confused and ignroant as well a control freak

    dismiss your ignorant arse, you contriol freak
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #48 - April 15, 2009, 10:16 PM
    Quote
    Ok, I see, so he brought up some raw material then cooked it together to make the Quran

    why don't you dismiss yourself? It will better for you


    He made stuff up in his head, he dictated it to someone who could write, they wrote it down, and that became the Qur'an.  IOW, exactly the same process that the illiterate poet Homer went through to compose the Iliad.

    What is so hard for you to grasp about that?
    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #49 - April 15, 2009, 10:17 PM
    Quote from: Tlaloc on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:09 PM
    Not only me who assrets that, but many of the kafirs as well, read this and educate yourself a bit

    Sir William Muir, a well-known critic of Islam, wrote in his book The Life of Mohamet:

    There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries with so pure a text

    and since Sir William Muir, wrote this another 225 years have rolled by and the truth has remained unchanged and pure as it was from day one of its complete revelation.

    Did he ignore the massive amount of Greek and Latin literature that we still have from 2000+ years ago, among other things?

    Such a claim sounds... uhmmm... quite imprecise at least lol



    We are talking about religious scriptures, not your harry potter books
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #50 - April 15, 2009, 10:19 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:16 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    Ahmed, give it up on the gratuitous insults whenever somebody disagrees with you.
    We've been over this before and we don't have infinite tolerance.

    Smite 1 for you. Two left before you're off to Damnation. Have a nice day.     parrot


    Mister confused and control freak

    calling someone confused and ignroant is not an insult, this is how I see them as I see you too, you are damn confused and ignroant as well a control freak

    dismiss your ignorant arse, you contriol freak

    As you wish. That's number 2 for you. I'm easy, mate. It's no skin off my nose.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #51 - April 15, 2009, 10:20 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:19 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:16 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    Ahmed, give it up on the gratuitous insults whenever somebody disagrees with you.
    We've been over this before and we don't have infinite tolerance.

    Smite 1 for you. Two left before you're off to Damnation. Have a nice day.     parrot


    Mister confused and control freak

    calling someone confused and ignroant is not an insult, this is how I see them as I see you too, you are damn confused and ignroant as well a control freak

    dismiss your ignorant arse, you contriol freak

    As you wish. That's number 2 for you. I'm easy, mate. It's no skin off my nose.



    Cool, let's make it # 3

    Fuk you
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #52 - April 15, 2009, 10:20 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:17 PM
    Quote from: Tlaloc on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:09 PM
    Not only me who assrets that, but many of the kafirs as well, read this and educate yourself a bit

    Sir William Muir, a well-known critic of Islam, wrote in his book The Life of Mohamet:

    There is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries with so pure a text

    and since Sir William Muir, wrote this another 225 years have rolled by and the truth has remained unchanged and pure as it was from day one of its complete revelation.

    Did he ignore the massive amount of Greek and Latin literature that we still have from 2000+ years ago, among other things?

    Such a claim sounds... uhmmm... quite imprecise at least lol



    We are talking about religious scriptures, not your harry potter books

    We do have religious and mythology scriptures among such literature.
    And philosophical texts.

    How do you think we know about religious customs from classical times?

    Not to count the fact that we have whole copies of the Gospels in Greek from about 1700 years ago
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #53 - April 15, 2009, 10:22 PM
    Ow.
    I think this is the end of fun for tonight Smiley

    Good night people!
    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #54 - April 15, 2009, 10:24 PM
    G'night Tlaloc. 

    Its weird the way some religious people throw such tantrums when faced with something they can't answer.
    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #55 - April 15, 2009, 10:24 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:20 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:19 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:16 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    Ahmed, give it up on the gratuitous insults whenever somebody disagrees with you.
    We've been over this before and we don't have infinite tolerance.

    Smite 1 for you. Two left before you're off to Damnation. Have a nice day.     parrot


    Mister confused and control freak

    calling someone confused and ignroant is not an insult, this is how I see them as I see you too, you are damn confused and ignroant as well a control freak

    dismiss your ignorant arse, you contriol freak

    As you wish. That's number 2 for you. I'm easy, mate. It's no skin off my nose.



    Cool, let's make it # 3

    Fuk you

    Ok. Have it your way.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #56 - April 15, 2009, 10:26 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:24 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:20 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:19 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:16 PM
    Quote from: osmanthus on April 15, 2009, 10:14 PM
    Quote from: AhmedBahgat on April 15, 2009, 10:05 PM
    Quote from: Cheetah on April 15, 2009, 10:04 PM
    Quote
    Well, how about your prove that message of the Quran is corrupted?, if you can not then you must give it the benefit of the doubt, hahahaha


    The Qur'an isn't from God.  Its something Mohammed made up as he went along, its no more divine than the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster - which also remains completely uncorrupted.   Smiley

    Quote
    on the other hand I can prove to you that the NT books are  corrupted, as well I can prove to you that the hadith books are corruppted, SEE


    That's okay, I already believe that the NT and hadeeth are dodgy.  That doesn't mean the Qur'an is anything other than man made though.




    Looks like you are a ocnfused ignorant

    Mohammed did not know how to read or write, you fool

    dismiss yourself

    Ahmed, give it up on the gratuitous insults whenever somebody disagrees with you.
    We've been over this before and we don't have infinite tolerance.

    Smite 1 for you. Two left before you're off to Damnation. Have a nice day.     parrot


    Mister confused and control freak

    calling someone confused and ignroant is not an insult, this is how I see them as I see you too, you are damn confused and ignroant as well a control freak

    dismiss your ignorant arse, you contriol freak

    As you wish. That's number 2 for you. I'm easy, mate. It's no skin off my nose.



    Cool, let's make it # 3

    Fuk you

    Ok. Have it your way.


    You are indeed a piece of shit of an admin

    you allow all the kafirs in here to call Muslims confused and deluded, and when I give it to them you cry like a girl

    fuk you agin, freak
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #57 - April 15, 2009, 10:28 PM
    You are dismissed.  Afro

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #58 - April 15, 2009, 10:29 PM
    As a Muslim, and the abusive man you have turned out to be, is it any wonder we chose to remain Kafirs?  
    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Prophet Muhammad vs Prophet Mani
     Reply #59 - April 15, 2009, 10:35 PM
    Quote
    You are indeed a piece of shit of an admin

    you allow all the kafirs in here to call Muslims confused and deluded, and when I give it to them you cry like a girl

    fuk you agin, freak


    Nobody has ever given you the kind of abusive,  insulting response here that you routinely resort to the minute you're faced with a post you can't answer. 

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Previous page 1 23 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »