Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Lights on the way
by akay
Today at 09:57 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 12:56 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
October 07, 2025, 09:50 AM

What's happened to the fo...
October 06, 2025, 11:58 AM

New Britain
October 05, 2025, 08:07 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
October 05, 2025, 07:55 AM

Kashmir endgame
October 04, 2025, 10:05 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
October 02, 2025, 12:03 PM

الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
September 24, 2025, 11:55 AM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
September 20, 2025, 07:39 PM

Jesus mythicism
by zeca
September 13, 2025, 10:59 PM

Orientalism - Edward Said
by zeca
August 22, 2025, 07:41 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!

 (Read 26626 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 ... 6 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #30 - December 28, 2009, 10:49 PM

    How come God/Allah/Jesus or whatever the name is, never mentioned "viruses" nor "Bacteria" in his text books. Allah mentioned the Mosquito as an example of the smallest creations. Doesn't this tell you something?

    ...
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #31 - December 28, 2009, 10:55 PM

    Because Scripture is not a Science Textbook.

    Scripture is about Spirituality.

    Ultimate Meaning etc.

    Challenge All Ideologies but don't Hate People.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #32 - December 28, 2009, 10:57 PM

    So then the age old question arises. Is a certain moral or ethical act wrong or right based on the virtue of the act itself, or is it based upon the whim of God?


    Yes. It is on the whim of a God.




    Challenge All Ideologies but don't Hate People.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #33 - December 28, 2009, 10:58 PM

    Which makes it easier to see it's man-made. Humans, being, you know.. whimsical and everything *drum roll*
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #34 - December 28, 2009, 11:02 PM

    Because Scripture is not a Science Textbook.

    Scripture is about Spirituality.

    Ultimate Meaning etc.


    but it mentioned Mosquitos, camels, horses.... Why not viruses? Is it because Mo did not know about them then?

    ...
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #35 - December 28, 2009, 11:08 PM

    Quote
    but it mentioned Mosquitos, camels, horses.... Why not viruses? Is it because Mo did not know about them then?


    Those are part of the vocabulary of the language at that time...using them as similies...metahphors...etc...it is just the use of language.

    What is the point of mentioning the Helium atom when that was not in the vocabulary of the language of the day...

    Challenge All Ideologies but don't Hate People.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #36 - December 28, 2009, 11:10 PM

    Well goes to prove that it wasn't made as an eternal book. Besides, the Quran says that there are literal parts, and parts that are metaphorical. And the infidels use the metaphorical to be literal. But I was never sure which part is meant to be taken literally and which part metaphorically.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #37 - December 28, 2009, 11:15 PM

    Quote
    Well goes to prove that it wasn't made as an eternal book.


    Muslim Falsafah have debated this for centuries.

    some said words of the Quran was eternal. It came into temporal context when it was revealed to Muhammad.


    Challenge All Ideologies but don't Hate People.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #38 - December 28, 2009, 11:17 PM

    lol ok not a very convincing conclusion I must say
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #39 - December 28, 2009, 11:22 PM

    Quote
    lol ok not a very convincing conclusion I must say


    If God exists outside of time...then his words has to be eternal. There is no other way.

    Challenge All Ideologies but don't Hate People.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #40 - December 28, 2009, 11:27 PM

    But that argument makes it even worse. So the eternal word (language) of God was that of a 7th century one?

    Besides how can word and language be eternal? Arabic has a root in Aramaic, a Semitic language rooted in Akkadian, rooted to Sumerian tablets. And the Arabic of the hjiaz has developed to modern classical Arabic. Which now has English words amongst other influences. OK my linguistic knowledge might suck, but am I making sense here?
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #41 - December 28, 2009, 11:39 PM

    Quote
    So the eternal word (language) of God was that of a 7th century one?



    God is outside of time. so this 7th century reference is irrelevant to him.

    God's eternal words took temporal form in Arabic in 7th Century.


    If God was to be reveal his message now - it would take temporal form in our own language.



    Challenge All Ideologies but don't Hate People.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #42 - December 28, 2009, 11:47 PM

    Hm interesting. So what would the temporal form for slavery be? And concubines? Sweat-shops and prostitutes?

    Or is language just letters and words combined into sentences? Coherent babble in other words.

    If language does not represent ideas, and symbols then what's its purpose?

    Finally, how come God does not reveal his eternal word in temporal form now? Since these words = values have changed. It's either that, or sticking to 7th century words and their values.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #43 - December 29, 2009, 12:10 AM

    Debate with what? you provided no evidence  Huh?
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #44 - December 29, 2009, 12:16 AM

    This is what muslims will say when debating God is it not?

    lol I suck at debating, I should stick to making jokes instead Cheesy

    To be fair though, I'm trying to see the loop-holes that I had about God's existence. Maybe I should point that, 3 pages into this thread  Cheesy
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #45 - December 29, 2009, 12:52 AM

    The validity of this argument is based on your faith in God, and on your faith in God alone. I can employ that very same argument to prove that the universe was created by a ... well anything you can think of.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #46 - December 29, 2009, 08:10 AM

    Wait...Are we disproving some vague deistic concept of god, or allah?
    If its allah, that's easy, its done a million different times on this forum alone.
    If its deistic god of vagueness, you will have to provide more attributes than 'timelessness'. Unless its just a 'thing' that is outside time and space, and doesnt do anything or think or interact or anything.

    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #47 - December 29, 2009, 08:21 AM

    Yeah it's not Allah, that's easier. Disprove Mo and Quran --> disprove Allah.

    But it's more of a vague deistic concept of god. I just don't understand how people that don't believe in religion believe in God. I'm trying to think like them and I'm failing. I seriously cant see any solid arguments or evidence for a God. Maybe I'm doing it wrong?  It's not that I want to believe or need to believe, it's more of a mental exercise. It's turning to be quite futile though.

    So far this is where I'm at:

    Anytime anybody says God. Or Gods. You go, where did you get this concept from? They point to book or set of books, you read those, and the people that wrote the books.

    However if they go, well it's mine own thoughts and observations. They need to describe their God(s), and what evidence they have. Why they need this God to be true. What purpose this god has. And the relation to our world. All of this needs to be proven and not simply asserted.

    Meanwhile back in the real world we have natural causes for almost everything. There is no real mystery to anything. Which I guess is a bit depressing if you grown up on fairy tales your whole life. But hey that's why God invented Prozac right?
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #48 - December 29, 2009, 08:22 AM

    I put an argument against the existence of a god with the attribute of being all knowing.
    How is it? I'd like to tackle that argument further

    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #49 - December 29, 2009, 09:08 AM

    I made a prediction ages ago, told my self if I ever stopped believing in Quran then I would most likely not believe in a God. I didn't believe in any other religion, so if Islam went then I really couldn't see what proof there was of a God. What is this God doing? Being smug? Careless? And it wouldn't really matter, if there now was a God he or she would make it clear. Everybody would follow the same religion. I mean literally the same. Deistic believers saying ?well I believe in this and that?, I couldn't see where they got their proof from. And honestly the arguments for a deistic god are pretty poor. I could believe in a pink Unicorn. Somebody might find that offensive or ridiculous. But why cant I find it ridiculous or silly that you believe in something you cant see, feel or touch etc. You cant point to any natural causes and go Aha here is the hand of god. And I never believed in mysteries, spirits and ghosts etc. It's the fact that Gods have been around for ages, so thinking they don?t exist used to get you killed in the past, and then we evolved to one God, thinking He (how silly is that seriously) doesnt exist got you killed. Now people think you're ridiculous if you believe in the FSM.

    I have friend who doesn?t believe in religion, and believes in a God, the God, and same God as everybody else believes in. He used to be an atheist before, and then became a deist. He never really said how this changed, arguments used several years ago were ?Take a look at the beauty and complexity of the world?, ?There are good people in the world. This comes from God. Evil is free will that God gave us. God made us responsible.? He?d refuse to say He or She for God, said that its silly.

    He wouldn?t say why its silly and he didn?t have to. I found it silly as well, and I was a muslim during these discussions with him. But I would think well, its metaphorical, and that?s how the arabs would understand it back then, just like the We form, which expresses a Royal-like tone. But these arguments don?t hold much ground, one if its metaphorical then She can be used. Two, arabs had female deities, it wouldn?t be difficult for them to understand She for god. And the We argument, well I never really understood that one.

    But next time we?ll have a talk, I?ll refer to god as transgendered. After all if god created the world, then he created transgendered humans. Whats wrong with that? If he says its silly, I?ll tell him yes it is, but that?s only your perception. Doesn?t make it real fact. Its not just as silly to believe there is something up there? Or all around us? God is in my poo? In the female rape victims wounds?

    Just because I agree with you and person X aggress with you doesn?t make it true. There are loads of people that believe in imaginary things, doesn?t make it true. A person can go to court, and a lot of people can believe he is innocent or guilty, none of that makes it true. Conclusive evidence proving he is guilty or innocent, now that makes it true or false. And the conclusive evidence for a God is what? ?How this world was created AND how its so beautiful". We explain the world with theory of evolution, and the argument for the beauty of world is really subjective, we think the world is subjective because we have nothing else to refer to. Similarly music can beautiful, art, etc, and these are all man-made.

    So really, what solid arguments and evidence is there for a God? Theistic/Deistic?
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #50 - December 29, 2009, 09:12 AM

    I put an argument against the existence of a god with the attribute of being all knowing.
    How is it? I'd like to tackle that argument further


    Sure. If God is eternal, seen the past and seen the future then God knows all there is to know? Although this word ?knowledge? is understood in the human sense. Its like saying God thinks, and then saying thats demeaning to God. As if God thinks like a human. Disorganized thoughts, one by one turning into a coherent thought.

    Its funny how we go, we are restricted by us being human and we cant possibly understand God. I used to take that argument and swallow it whole. Cause it made ?sense?.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #51 - December 29, 2009, 09:25 AM

    To quote Don Rumsfeld:
    Quote
    There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.


    God cant know that it is eternal (god actually cant know that its not a project or program being played out by another god even or if there was some dimension that god was not aware of, god would not be able to know of it or what is in it.) You could say that god knows everything, so if there was a secret dimension god would know of it....However, God could not know he knows about something he doesnt know about.  

    I know this sounds confusing, but it shows a problem with omniscience. Even if the being does actually know everything else, it cant know it knows everything. Therefor there is something it does not know.

    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #52 - December 29, 2009, 09:58 AM

    I see what you mean. In my mind when I imagined God as All-Knowing I imagined a line representing time and infinity, and everything known in that line is known to God. That's how god knows all that is known. But to say God knows all that is unknown contradicts the All Knowing part, agreed. But you would never argue for that though? You would argue there is nothing unknown to God.

    But this is a philosophical question. It doesn't even prove God's existence. Not convincing proof at least.

    How about this little *gem:

    Can God make a rock so big he can't lift it? If he can't lift it, then he's not omnipotent. But if he can't make such a rock, then he's also not omnipotent. Therefore, an omnipotent God can't exist.

    I know this is not in regards to All-Knowing. But maybe there is something like the above but for Omniscience.

    In regards to that argument I will say this, when I first heard it, I was a muslim, I couldn't solve it. And I knew it wasn't meant to be solved. So I ignored it.


    *
    http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/000883.html
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #53 - December 29, 2009, 10:08 AM

    Quote
    I see what you mean. In my mind when I imagined God as All-Knowing I imagined a line representing time and infinity, and everything known in that line is known to God. That's how god knows all that is known. But to say God knows all that is unknown contradicts the All Knowing part, agreed. But you would never argue for that though? You would argue there is nothing unknown to God.


    Yes, I see what you mean there. It is semantics. But it proves that there would be something that god does not know....The IF, the possibility..the answer to that unknown question, would be unknown to God. God could not know with absolute certainty that god knows everything, and that would be something he wouldnt know.
    So, no matter what, nothing could be omniscience

    Quote
    Can God make a rock so big he can't lift it? If he can't lift it, then he's not omnipotent. But if he can't make such a rock, then he's also not omnipotent. Therefore, an omnipotent God can't exist.


    People brush that question off, as a joke, but actually I think it is a good one. It shows that omnipotence is a paradox, and therefor cant exist.


    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #54 - December 30, 2009, 10:48 AM

    Can God make a rock so big he can't lift it? If he can't lift it, then he's not omnipotent. But if he can't make such a rock, then he's also not omnipotent. Therefore, an omnipotent God can't exist.

    I know this is not in regards to All-Knowing. But maybe there is something like the above but for Omniscience.

    Absolutely genius BlackDog. If you though it up then all hats off to you  Smiley.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #55 - December 30, 2009, 11:05 AM

    I see what you mean. In my mind when I imagined God as All-Knowing I imagined a line representing time and infinity, and everything known in that line is known to God. That's how god knows all that is known. But to say God knows all that is unknown contradicts the All Knowing part, agreed. But you would never argue for that though? You would argue there is nothing unknown to God.

    But this is a philosophical question. It doesn't even prove God's existence. Not convincing proof at least.

    How about this little *gem:

    Can God make a rock so big he can't lift it? If he can't lift it, then he's not omnipotent. But if he can't make such a rock, then he's also not omnipotent. Therefore, an omnipotent God can't exist.

    I know this is not in regards to All-Knowing. But maybe there is something like the above but for Omniscience.

    In regards to that argument I will say this, when I first heard it, I was a muslim, I couldn't solve it. And I knew it wasn't meant to be solved. So I ignored it.


    *
    http://tim.2wgroup.com/blog/archives/000883.html



    Nice, I always liked that example of the fallacy of Omnipotent, all powerful, all everything God!

    ...
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #56 - December 31, 2009, 01:09 AM

    Absolutely genius BlackDog. If you though it up then all hats off to you  Smiley.


    No I wish I was that smart Cheesy But still very good, I want to find more of these paradoxes.
  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #57 - December 31, 2009, 02:26 PM

    No I wish I was that smart Cheesy But still very good, I want to find more of these paradoxes.

    I think the rock thingy might be thrown away by using "God doesn't live in a materialistic world" or something stupid like that. Try replacing the rock with a "God grander than him", and tweak it a bit if you want.

    "In every time and culture there are pressures to conform to the prevailing prejudices. But there are also, in every place and epoch, those who value the truth; who record the evidence faithfully. Future generations are in their debt." -Carl Sagan

  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #58 - December 31, 2009, 02:28 PM

    I remember an atheist friend in high school confronted me with the rock question. I was a Muslimeen back then and answered it by saying that god can create a rock that he can't lift and he can also lift a rock that he can't lift because Allah subhanawatala isn't bound be logic. How close I was to the truth.

    Iblis has mad debaterin' skillz. Best not step up unless you're prepared to recieve da pain.

  • Re: Try to defeat my God, I dare ye!
     Reply #59 - January 01, 2010, 10:19 AM

    lol @kafi

    good point liberated, but that means god is not in our universe not bound by our rules, means you need to prove even more when you propose that counter-argument
  • Previous page 1 23 4 ... 6 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »