Its not really that strange an argument.
I'm not saying it's strange. I'm saying I said the same thing about your argument technique against me.
Its an essential tool that we rely on to...
...categorize and understand the objects, events and principles of THIS universe that are completely worthless when trying to penetrate the singularity of the Divine. So why are you insisting on using it for that? You don't see scientists trying to use physics to penetrate the singularities beyond the Big Bang or inside of a black hole when they know that physics as we know it is useless for those tasks. If they did they would be idiots, wouldn't they?
Take the hint.
When you consider that anything that your religion bears all the classic hallmarks of a manmade religion, and none of the hallmarks of something that could be considered divine.
I consider that, between the two of us, you are the only one who believes that.
Coincidence, considering that there are thousands of religions before it (and after it) that did the same, had people fooled, and were just as false?
This is you putting forth your own personal belief as a universal Truth. Don't you just hate it when someone who doesn't believe what you beieve in does that crap like it's a foregone conclusion?